|
ali_kat
22,453 posts
90 months
|
oobster said: The arrested bloke had a daughter the same age as missing April if I recall.  Same class IIRC
|
|
|
Jasandjules
45,388 posts
98 months
|
Oakey said: Will the creator of that page be arrested like the guy with the Dale Cregan page was or is 'trolling' a one way street? Report it to the police and find out.
|
|
|
jonny142
464 posts
94 months
|
ali_kat said: oobster said: The arrested bloke had a daughter the same age as missing April if I recall. Same class IIRC Thanks for that ,narrows it down then ,a grievance of some sort then ?
|
|
|
schmalex
8,670 posts
75 months
|
.... Or maybe he simply had a child in the same class and had an earlier parents evening appointment. Stranger things have happened.
|
|
|
DoubleSix
2,521 posts
45 months
|
Whole thing makes me feel sick.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Dr Doofenshmirtz
6,913 posts
69 months
|
I did wonder if maybe April was bullying this blokes kid and possibly he decided to take matters into his own hands - and it all went horribly wrong?
Pure speculation of course. It's all very odd.
|
|
|
robuk
462 posts
59 months
|
Police activity reported on Barmouth beach.
|
|
|
RaeB
488 posts
83 months
|
robuk said: Police activity reported on Barmouth beach. False alarm, they've just rescued someone training for a triathlon according to Sky.
|
|
|
DavidUK
130 posts
66 months
|
Keyser Soze said: The police knew they were looking for a LHD vehicle as April was seen to get into the vehicle on the drivers side
Its all in the thread would only take you 30 mins to read and catch up I might have misunderstood the situation, but wasn't the LHD theory taken up on the word of some small children who said April climbed into the drivers side? What if the small children were mistaken? Or what if they were right, but the girl climbed into the drivers side of a RIGHT hand drive vehicle? They also said that it was a van. Maybe small children would describe a land rover as a van, but maybe it really WAS a van. It just seems very strange that no DNA evidence has been found in this blokes land rover
|
|
|
don'tbesilly
365 posts
32 months
|
DavidUK said: It just seems very strange that no DNA evidence has been found in this blokes land rover The Police have confirmed that? If so,could you link to the source,thanks.
|
|
|
DavidUK
130 posts
66 months
|
don'tbesilly said: The Police have confirmed that?
If so,could you link to the source,thanks. The Police haven't said they have found anything whatsoever.
|
|
|
hornetrider
40,789 posts
74 months
|
DavidUK said: The Police haven't said they have found anything whatsoever. Here's some news for you. The police will not be sharing every single scrap and fact of the investigation with Joe Q.
|
|
|
Chrisw666
20,868 posts
68 months
|
ChunkyloverSV said: Yet another reason I'll never use it. I don't think its right that people who murder kids get bed and board for life but equally I don't understand how these idiots can't split arrested on suspicion of and charged with. Pre bookface you'd have a few opinions voiced in the media, now half brained barely literate imbeciles can have their fill of hearing half a story and spew their moronic utterings into a sea of like minded mongs and gain a sense of pride from assuming they're right.
|
|
|
dfen5
1,137 posts
81 months
|
In cases like this I don't see why they don't pump the suspects full of truth drugs and see what they say. If it might mean finding the victin alive (if time allows) or even dead, it's got to be worth a go. If nothing is right, what difference would it make to a trial?
The girl looked so happy in the pictures. Truly heart breaking to think someone may have taken her life.
|
|
|
DavidUK
130 posts
66 months
|
hornetrider said: Here's some news for you. The police will not be sharing every single scrap and fact of the investigation with Joe Q. Possibily, but if they had found something I would think they would have disclosed it. In the absence of this it's safer to assume they haven't found anything than the other way around.
|
|
|
don'tbesilly
365 posts
32 months
|
DavidUK said: don'tbesilly said: The Police have confirmed that?
If so,could you link to the source,thanks. The Police haven't said they have found anything whatsoever. I doubt the Police would deny or confirm either way,certain things are never publicly declared until a trial,should one go ahead. Listening to the news this evening,it was said that one of the reasons that Bridger had been arrested for suspicion of murder, was because of forensic evidence gained,however where that evidence came from was not disclosed. It could well have came from the landrover.
|
|
|
oobster
4,559 posts
80 months
|
DavidUK said: hornetrider said: Here's some news for you. The police will not be sharing every single scrap and fact of the investigation with Joe Q. Possibily, but if they had found something I would think they would have disclosed it. In the absence of this it's safer to assume they haven't found anything than the other way around. <insert not sure if serious image> Why would the police disclose any evidence? The only people the police should disclose any evidence to is perhaps her family and to the cps.
|
|
|
DavidUK
130 posts
66 months
|
don'tbesilly said: I doubt the Police would deny or confirm either way,certain things are never publicly declared until a trial,should one go ahead.
Listening to the news this evening,it was said that one of the reasons that Bridger had been arrested for suspicion of murder, was because of forensic evidence gained,however where that evidence came from was not disclosed.
It could well have came from the landrover. Maybe your right, who knows? I'm just starting to get a little uncomfortable with this now just as I was with the Joanna Yates case when nearly everyone thought they had the right man and I was one of the few who didn't, based simply on that it didn't make sense. This also doesn't make sense on several levels, the main one being that if Bridger did it how could he even hope to get away with it as all reported 'suspicious movements' of his were conducted in broad daylight? If he did it then was certainly wasn't trying to be careful and yet there appears to be very little, if any, solid evidence.
|
|
|
DavidUK
130 posts
66 months
|
oobster said: <insert not sure if serious image>
Why would the police disclose any evidence? The only people the police should disclose any evidence to is perhaps her family and to the cps. That they have had to apply for several extentions to his detention would SUGGEST they don't have solid evidence otherwise they would have charged him earlier, and yet they still haven't charged him.
|
|
|
Oakey
13,705 posts
85 months
|
dfen5 said: In cases like this I don't see why they don't pump the suspects full of truth drugs and see what they say. If it might mean finding the victin alive (if time allows) or even dead, it's got to be worth a go. If nothing is right, what difference would it make to a trial?
The girl looked so happy in the pictures. Truly heart breaking to think someone may have taken her life. Why stop there? Why not water board them as well?
|
|
