End of the Labour Party

Author
Discussion

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
AJS- said:
Do you live there DJRC? Would be interested to hear a bit more about how it actually works - as in does it get bogged down in trivia? Is it responsive to events compared with the Westminster model? I assume it's a slower process, and in my view that could be a good thing...
Yep I do. Not really. Counter arguments, debates, then everyone postal votes and sends them in. Its a cultural thing though, everybody buys into the process. The votes are talied up and whoever wins wins.

Its a bit more complicated than that, esp. when you add in forcing through a Federal level vote by process of gathering enough signatures as an individual, but thats essentially it.

RichyBoy

3,739 posts

217 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
http://labour25.com

Maybe I don't watch a lot of tv but I don't remember seeing any news stories about the above.

AJS-

Original Poster:

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
RichyBoy said:
http://labour25.com

Maybe I don't watch a lot of tv but I don't remember seeing any news stories about the above.
Yeah but it keeps UKIP with their unsavory types out.

Pints

18,444 posts

194 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
AJS- said:
Pints said:
Somewhat O/T but I think some sort of 3 question, multiple choice test should replace what we have as the "vote for a party" system we currently use.

Something like this.

Select 2 of the following choices to register your vote:
- more bureaucrats should be employed
- benefit payments should be reduced for the unemployed
- laws imposed by Brussels are a good thing
- private transport is preferable to public transport
Etc.

You get the idea. The questions could address specific policies each party has and you'd need at least a rudimentary understanding of where your preferred party actually stands to force a particular party way.
A different choice could Choi mean the difference between UKIP and Tory, or Labour and Lib Dem.
You'd end up with an endless raft of questions.

How about a system without active politicians where members of the public can propose a referendum then have to get a certain number of signatures - say 1,000 for local/distric issues, 10,000 for city/county issues and 100,000 for national issues - then the proposal is put to a vote.

You could have a series of referendums every year to create new laws, or just as importantly to scrap old ones.
Thats called Direct Democracy and welcome to Switzerland smile You get a letter through your post, usually about once ever quarter with issues for you to vote on at Cantonal level and Federal level.
wavey all.

I'm off to Switzerland.