Cocktail of liquid nitrogen - Girl has stomach removed

Cocktail of liquid nitrogen - Girl has stomach removed

Author
Discussion

RealSquirrels

11,327 posts

192 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
hope they don't ban nitrogen.

quite likely considering their level of scientific literacy.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
RealSquirrels said:
hope they don't ban nitrogen.

quite likely considering their level of scientific literacy.
What would we replace atmospheric nitrogen with? Partial pressures of O2 much above what we have are quite toxic, and fires become a real problem. How much would it cost to replace the atmosphere with a diving trimix?

rohrl

8,737 posts

145 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
What would we replace atmospheric nitrogen with? Partial pressures of O2 much above what we have are quite toxic, and fires become a real problem. How much would it cost to replace the atmosphere with a diving trimix?
The sun's got loads of Helium in it, let's go and get that. Added bonus of funny Joe Pasquale voices.

Steameh

3,155 posts

210 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
It really doesn't need more fecking legislation, a dose of common sense really should suffice.
They definitely should ban it, what difference does it make really. It shouldn't be being used anyway.

RealSquirrels

11,327 posts

192 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
argon would be the best bet for replacing nitrogen I think.

Vipers

32,886 posts

228 months

Friday 30th November 2012
quotequote all
RealSquirrels said:
argon would be the best bet for replacing nitrogen I think.
Can't remember the percentage, but argon is quite narcotic.




smile

turbobloke

103,955 posts

260 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
Not quite the same in terms of detail but just the same in terms of stupidity and the harmful outcome.

More liquid nitrogen idiocy


Munter

31,319 posts

241 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Not quite the same in terms of detail but just the same in terms of stupidity and the harmful outcome.

More liquid nitrogen idiocy
I think I'm with this guy from the comments:

In what way could this ever have gone 'right'?

- Matt Wix , Saffron Walden, 19/6/2013 09:35

mattnunn

14,041 posts

161 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
Choking on chlorine gas is only mildly less preferable to drinking that stuff in the first place.

hairykrishna

13,166 posts

203 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Not quite the same in terms of detail but just the same in terms of stupidity and the harmful outcome.

More liquid nitrogen idiocy
I wonder what the reaction they were supposedly getting is? My chemistry is terrible but nitrogen gas is pretty inert. I would have guessed that they were just being suffocated by the nitrogen displacing oxygen.

HundredthIdiot

4,414 posts

284 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
Choking on chlorine gas is only mildly less preferable to drinking that stuff in the first place.
The article says "Officials say that when the liquid nitrogen came in contact with the water, the chemical substance reacted with the chlorine and formed a toxic cloud that left the young party goers gasping for breath"

I don't really understand that, from a chemistry p.o.v. Anyone?

Seems more likely that a cloud of cold, inert nitrogen would form on the surface of the pool and act as an asphyxiant.

otolith

56,134 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
It's total bks, there was no reaction, they asphyxiated in a layer of cold nitrogen.

emicen

8,585 posts

218 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
HundredthIdiot said:
mattnunn said:
Choking on chlorine gas is only mildly less preferable to drinking that stuff in the first place.
The article says "Officials say that when the liquid nitrogen came in contact with the water, the chemical substance reacted with the chlorine and formed a toxic cloud that left the young party goers gasping for breath"

I don't really understand that, from a chemistry p.o.v. Anyone?

Seems more likely that a cloud of cold, inert nitrogen would form on the surface of the pool and act as an asphyxiant.
Without doing any research is it not also quite likely the chlorine is less soluble in water at lower temps hence nitrogen cloud plus chlorine evolving out the water at the same time. All in all, not something I'd choose to inhale.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
hairykrishna said:
turbobloke said:
Not quite the same in terms of detail but just the same in terms of stupidity and the harmful outcome.

More liquid nitrogen idiocy
I wonder what the reaction they were supposedly getting is? My chemistry is terrible but nitrogen gas is pretty inert. I would have guessed that they were just being suffocated by the nitrogen displacing oxygen.
Probably. Newspapers are not famous for accuracy with things like this.

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
Oh yes, and there is so much Chlorine in a swimming pool rolleyes (not aimed at previous posters, just sarcasm smile ).

Pour liquid Nitrogen into water and the Nitrogen 'boils', expands a lot as it becomes gaseous and people will suffocate invisibly (as stated above, in effect) - just because the party-goers are out of the 'cloud' doesn't mean they have any access to Oxygen wink ...

When good times go bad, eh? frown

otolith

56,134 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
Gas solubility generally decreases with temperature. Chlorine is usually added to swimming pools in the form of bleach. I think this was a similar accident to a spill of liquid nitrogen in a confined space or pit.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
It was probably the prescence of a video camera. In my extensive research there is a strong corrolation between near fatal accidents and the video cameras. They're just lucky someone didn't shout "watch this".

hairykrishna

13,166 posts

203 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
I wonder why they were using LN2? Dry ice lumps would give basically the same effect and at least you'd get some warning that you're suffocating before passing out.

Munter

31,319 posts

241 months

Wednesday 19th June 2013
quotequote all
hairykrishna said:
I wonder why they were using LN2? Dry ice lumps would give basically the same effect and at least you'd get some warning that you're suffocating before passing out.
Now consider that you have already put more thought into it than the organisers... wink