BBC to out Senior Political Figure as Paedophile
Discussion
rohrl said:
turbobloke said:
More of a blunder by Sacks than the BBC really, if you can call being honest a blunder. I don't think they should have apologised.Do you think there's a chance you might be unhealthily obsessed with finding evidence of bias in the BBC, like you clearly are with climate change?
Chim said:
So DLT has now confirmed that he is indeed being investigated for two 40 year old accusation of arse grabbing. Career ruined and reputation down the pan. Well done to the police, they have firmly dealt with this dangerous sexual predator. Women up and down the country can sleep soundly in their beds tonight.
f
king joke
Yep, this is turning in to a farce. f
king jokeSome kind of dragnet that is going to ruin people (and already has)
Will every man that has ever tried it on with a woman please hand himself in to the police.
Edited by Wills2 on Saturday 17th November 09:53
Wills2 said:
Chim said:
So DLT has now confirmed that he is indeed being investigated for two 40 year old accusation of arse grabbing. Career ruined and reputation down the pan. Well done to the police, they have firmly dealt with this dangerous sexual predator. Women up and down the country can sleep soundly in their beds tonight.
fking joke
Yep, this is turning in to a farce. f
king jokeSome kind of dragnet that is going to ruin people (and already has)
Will every man that has ever tried it on with a woman please hand himself in to the police.
In a country where school-based jobsworth asshats turn Primary school kids over to the Courts for playground name-calling, what more can we expect
Pesty said:
Who was that BBC tv journalist who a few months ago was photographed while giving a female colleague a goodbye hug slipped his hand down the back of her jeans.
Will that be now investigated as sexual assault?
Probably not, it was Andrew Marr and the grope appeared to be consensual.Will that be now investigated as sexual assault?
At least it did to Mrs Marr.
turbobloke said:
Probably not, it was Andrew Marr and the grope appeared to be consensual.
had the woman been drinking? she might not have been in full capacity to agree to it. And might be too scared to complain for another 20 years.The DLT Case as reported so far seems a little odd. Is that it juts a hand on arse 20 years ago?
When I was 19 I worked in a factory that was 75% ish women. They did all the hand fitting of parts on what was called the chicken line' back to back lines of rows of women.
Christ how red I would get if I had to walk down the middle of them. not one young man walked down there without being sexually assaulted and verbally abused. And I'm not just talking hands on arse. I wouldn't mind but they were mostly old
Pesty said:
turbobloke said:
Probably not, it was Andrew Marr and the grope appeared to be consensual.
had the woman been drinking? she might not have been in full capacity to agree to it. Pesty said:
And might be too scared to complain for another 20 years.
Memory is such a strange thing...Pesty said:
The DLT Case as reported so far seems a little odd. Is that it juts a hand on arse 20 years ago?
Boob jiggling, allegedly.I'd say that it should be an Olympic sport but you can't say that.
The oddest thing about this case is that the paedophile claim against McAlpine isn't new. McAlpine has been called a paedophile on the internet for years - with an associated story about an old video of him partaking in abuse. This being lent to an investigative program and a journalist having to leave the room to be sick after only a couple of minutes, but the video being covered up regardless.
In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
Puffing Devil said:
The oddest thing about this case is that the paedophile claim against McAlpine isn't new. McAlpine has been called a paedophile on the internet for years - with an associated story about an old video of him partaking in abuse. This being lent to an investigative program and a journalist having to leave the room to be sick after only a couple of minutes, but the video being covered up regardless.
In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
OK:In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
1) not everything on the Internet is true, but
2) you already know that, so
3) you must have corroborating evidence, in which case
4) please share, or
5) stop repeating the same old nonsense that Scallywag/etc has been peddling
http://pebpr.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/over-last-few-...
That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
Puffing Devil said:
http://pebpr.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/over-last-few-...
That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
"The above piece was written by David Icke"That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
Enough said.
loafer123 said:
Puffing Devil said:
http://pebpr.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/over-last-few-...
That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
"The above piece was written by David Icke"That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.
Enough said.
ks, citing it as a proof source. Puffing Devil said:
The oddest thing about this case is that the paedophile claim against McAlpine isn't new. McAlpine has been called a paedophile on the internet for years - with an associated story about an old video of him partaking in abuse. This being lent to an investigative program and a journalist having to leave the room to be sick after only a couple of minutes, but the video being covered up regardless.
In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
while the claims have been around a while, they were still only being viewed by a very small number of people. It's possible that McAlpine didn't sue years ago because he thought that by doing so he would simply draw the claims to much wider attention (which if kind of what eventually happened anyway, but there you go). In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
That McAlpine has been the victim of mistaken identity is terrible for him and his family and it is right that he now seeks to clear his name and seek redress. However, abuse DID occur in North Wales children's homes and doubt remains about the effectiveness and impartiality of previous investigations. The need for a new, full and independent inquiry into both the abuse itself and the subsequent Jillings Repoirt and the Waterhouse Inquiry is as great as ever.
The key, as always with these things is to read very carefully exactly what the good Lord has said did not happen. The Scallywag articles on this subject makes very depressing reading if any of it is true, perhaps it was a different and now deceased classic car loving Mcapline involved in the Bryn Estyn abuse scandal. It would seem that much like the Savile cases and other peado cases, the establishments main concern is not the victims but the reputation of the establishment itself. Infact the BBC is doing exactly the same and it is a disgrace that time and again various arms of government get away with such perverse behaviour and no one is brought to book or suffer any great sanction. Quite how Entwhistle has got away with in excess of a million pounds for such a staggering level of incompetence and uselessness is beyond me too.
Puffing Devil said:
The oddest thing about this case is that the paedophile claim against McAlpine isn't new. McAlpine has been called a paedophile on the internet for years - with an associated story about an old video of him partaking in abuse. This being lent to an investigative program and a journalist having to leave the room to be sick after only a couple of minutes, but the video being covered up regardless.
In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
I thought it had been shown that Lord McAlpine is guilty only of having the same last name as another child-molester?In fact the original internet article about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile specifically mentions that it was in relation to a North Wales children home and says the video was filmed in Wales.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff