BBC to out Senior Political Figure as Paedophile

[tubbystu]

rover 623gsi said:

The need for a new, full and independent inquiry into both the abuse itself and the subsequent Jillings Repoirt and the Waterhouse Inquiry is as great as ever.

And if anything good is going to come out of all this sordid mess, then a complete review of everything would be a result. Whatever the top rank of review is called, a Royal Review or something. But something with independence. Who could be the judge ? After Hutton and Chilcot amongst several others who could we really trust ?

There is either inherent incompetence or complicity covering something ugly. Several reports cannot find enough evidence. Well, the time has come. Perhaps we need to lower the threshold if multiple linked similar claims are made ?

The 70's were a pretty dark decade and there are many skeletons.

[completetangent]

Puffing Devil said:

http://pebpr.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/over-last-few-...

That's one. Date of the article is in the url. There are multiple accounts saying the same thing, some which even go into details about some (psychological) torture inflicted on one of the boys. I'm not wading in on one side or the other, just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.

And - surprise, surprise - read the article you linked to - it's based on the same Scallywag article. For Scallywag, read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Regan Simon Regan was convicted of smearing a Tory Mp during an electrion campaign: The former editor claimed falsely on his web site that Dr Julian Lewis
was a secret homosexual, a transvestite, a user of escort agencies - for girls to accompany him to political events - and a frequenter of "male dens of iniquity".

And, as others have mentioned, that pebpr page is written by David Icke, of "they're all lizards" fame.

If you're serious about having doubts (i.e. the bit I put in bold), why on Earth wouldn't you wait for genuine stand-up-in-court evidence of wrongdoing? Like many hysterical posters on this thread, I wonder if you have a coincidental agenda (anti-Tory, anti-establishment, anti-gay, who knows?) and/or just love the thrill of sex-based rumourmongering.

[TheSnitch]

Puffing Devil said:

..... just something doesn't hang right about this whole story.

Did it occur to you that the bit that didn't ''hang right'' about the story was the fact that it was written by a complete arsepart?

There is a site online where a complete nutjob takes news articles from the papers, copies them word for word inserting the word ''Brother'' in front of the name of anyone mentioned in them, and then posts them online. I have lost track of the number of times someone has quoted that site as ''Proof'' that some politician is a Freemason.

[pmanson]

Liking his approach

Lord McAlpine, the former Conservative party treasurer, has announced his determination to sue Sally Bercow for damages after dropping claims against non-celebrity Twitter users.

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

[RSoovy4]

pmanson said:

Liking his approach

Lord McAlpine, the former Conservative party treasurer, has announced his determination to sue Sally Bercow for damages after dropping claims against non-celebrity Twitter users.

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

So do I.

It's about time someone taught that woman some manners.

[MX7]

pmanson said:

Liking his approach

Lord McAlpine, the former Conservative party treasurer, has announced his determination to sue Sally Bercow for damages after dropping claims against non-celebrity Twitter users.

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

I think he's done very well in filtering out non-'celebrities' there, and hopefully everyone will realise that idle chat, even on something as vapid as Twitter, can have significant consequences for all those concerned.

Good on him.

[AnonSpoilsport]

MX7 said:

pmanson said:

Liking his approach

Lord McAlpine, the former Conservative party treasurer, has announced his determination to sue Sally Bercow for damages after dropping claims against non-celebrity Twitter users.

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

I think he's done very well in filtering out non-'celebrities' there, and hopefully everyone will realise that idle chat, even on something as vapid as Twitter, can have significant consequences for all those concerned.

Good on him.

Please tell me he's not letting the odious George Monbiot off? Please!

[MX7]

AnonSpoilsport said:

Please tell me he's not letting the odious George Monbiot off? Please!

"The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less"

Probably.

[jimmyjimjim]

62,873 followers. I had to check, you had me worried there.

Relax, he should still be getting a legal rogering.

[AnonSpoilsport]

jimmyjimjim said:

62,873 followers. I had to check, you had me worried there.

Relax, he should still be getting a legal rogering.

Thank god. If anyone deserves bankrupting and shutting up (down) it's that piece of excrement in human form.

[Happy82]

AnonSpoilsport said:

jimmyjimjim said:

62,873 followers. I had to check, you had me worried there.

Relax, he should still be getting a legal rogering.

Thank god. If anyone deserves bankrupting and shutting up (down) it's that piece of excrement in human form.

[DJRC]

pmanson said:

Liking his approach

Lord McAlpine, the former Conservative party treasurer, has announced his determination to sue Sally Bercow for damages after dropping claims against non-celebrity Twitter users.

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

Good. I hope he sues the bh till she bleeds.

[MX7]

Brian Monbiot: "You don't need to follow me, you don't need to follow anybody!"

[Andy Zarse]

DJRC said:

Good. I hope he sues the bh till she bleeds.

The Beeb only had to pay £185,000 for the whole Newsnight fiasco. My guess is he'll settle out of court for about £50k. Painful, as it will eat into her handbag and spa weekend budget, but won't put the foul hag on the street and in the gutter where she belongs.

If JB wasn't so -struck and had any backbone at all he'd can her; she's a complete embarrassment to him and his Office.

[Brite spark]

pmanson said:

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

Nice to know he's thinking about the children.

[loafer123]

Brite spark said:

pmanson said:

The peer has now ended his legal action against Twitter users with a following of 500 people or less and asked them to make a donation of £25 to the BBC's Children In Need.

Nice to know he's thinking about the children.

...which is more than his accusers did, presumably distracted by the fleckled spit spewing from their faux-outraged, tight lipped mouths.

[anonymous-user]

Andy Zarse said:

The Beeb only had to pay £185,000 for the whole Newsnight fiasco. My guess is he'll settle out of court for about £50k. Painful, as it will eat into her handbag and spa weekend budget, but won't put the foul hag on the street and in the gutter where she belongs.

If JB wasn't so -struck and had any backbone at all he'd can her; she's a complete embarrassment to him and his Office.

So you're not one of her biggest fans then, Andy?

[Andy Zarse]

REALIST123 said:

So you're not one of her biggest fans then, Andy?

She's an ugly gob-on-a-stick who is about to get her comeupance.

[DJRC]

Andy Zarse said:

DJRC said:

Good. I hope he sues the bh till she bleeds.

The Beeb only had to pay £185,000 for the whole Newsnight fiasco. My guess is he'll settle out of court for about £50k. Painful, as it will eat into her handbag and spa weekend budget, but won't put the foul hag on the street and in the gutter where she belongs.

If JB wasn't so -struck and had any backbone at all he'd can her; she's a complete embarrassment to him and his Office.

fk the money. Any out of court settlement Id want to be very simple...she stands on the empty plinth in Trafalgar square for 24hrs with a clapboard on her admitting she was wrong and apologising.

[Grenoble]

DJRC said:

fk the money. Any out of court settlement Id want to be very simple...she stands on the empty plinth in Trafalgar square for 24hrs with a clapboard on her admitting she was wrong and apologising.

Shame is a powerful and underused mechanism for justice. Our default options in this country seem to be "jail" or "money"...