How far will house prices fall [volume 4]

How far will house prices fall [volume 4]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Randy Winkman

16,139 posts

189 months

Monday 5th May 2014
quotequote all
A heck of a lot of the money for property must be coming from selling property (currently owned or inherited) rather than from wages paying monthly mortgage bills. I wonder how that will continue to pan out.

Art0ir

9,401 posts

170 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Mark Carney said:
The issue around the housing market in the UK ... is there are not sufficient numbers of houses being built... We're not going to build a single house at the Bank of England. We can't influence that.

What we can influence is whether the banks are strong enough. Do they have enough capital against risk in the housing market? [We can also] check lending procedures so people can get mortgages if they can afford them but they won't if they can't. By reinforcing both of those, we can reduce the risk that comes from a housing market that has deep, deep structural problems.

We don't want to build up another big debt overhang that is going to hurt individuals and is very much going to slow the economy in the medium term. We'd be concerned if there was a rapid increase in high loan-to-value mortgages across the banks. We've seen that creeping up and it's something we're watching closely.

The biggest risk to financial stability, and therefore to the durability of the expansion, centers on the housing market and that's why we're focused on that.
More later today in an interview with Sky News.

Pork

9,453 posts

234 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Art0ir said:
Mark Carney said:
The issue around the housing market in the UK ... is there are not sufficient numbers of houses being built... We're not going to build a single house at the Bank of England. We can't influence that.

What we can influence is whether the banks are strong enough. Do they have enough capital against risk in the housing market? [We can also] check lending procedures so people can get mortgages if they can afford them but they won't if they can't. By reinforcing both of those, we can reduce the risk that comes from a housing market that has deep, deep structural problems.

We don't want to build up another big debt overhang that is going to hurt individuals and is very much going to slow the economy in the medium term. We'd be concerned if there was a rapid increase in high loan-to-value mortgages across the banks. We've seen that creeping up and it's something we're watching closely.

The biggest risk to financial stability, and therefore to the durability of the expansion, centers on the housing market and that's why we're focused on that.
More later today in an interview with Sky News.
Something needs doing. We went to see some friend yesterday who bought a house in Charlton, London 18 months ago. They're selling it now, advertised at 136% more than the paid for it! They've done some work, which would account for an increase, but no way has that work more than doubled the value.

Quite amusing listening to them, they were quite embarrassed at the increase, playing it down. I hope they sell, they're a lovely couple, but it's just crazy.

turbobloke

103,963 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Mark Carney said:
people can get mortgages if they can afford them but they won't if they can't
Should have told Clinton and Achtenberg all those years ago...not that they would have listened.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

160 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Pork said:
Art0ir said:
Mark Carney said:
The issue around the housing market in the UK ... is there are not sufficient numbers of houses being built... We're not going to build a single house at the Bank of England. We can't influence that.

What we can influence is whether the banks are strong enough. Do they have enough capital against risk in the housing market? [We can also] check lending procedures so people can get mortgages if they can afford them but they won't if they can't. By reinforcing both of those, we can reduce the risk that comes from a housing market that has deep, deep structural problems.

We don't want to build up another big debt overhang that is going to hurt individuals and is very much going to slow the economy in the medium term. We'd be concerned if there was a rapid increase in high loan-to-value mortgages across the banks. We've seen that creeping up and it's something we're watching closely.

The biggest risk to financial stability, and therefore to the durability of the expansion, centers on the housing market and that's why we're focused on that.
More later today in an interview with Sky News.
Something needs doing. We went to see some friend yesterday who bought a house in Charlton, London 18 months ago. They're selling it now, advertised at 136% more than the paid for it! They've done some work, which would account for an increase, but no way has that work more than doubled the value.

Quite amusing listening to them, they were quite embarrassed at the increase, playing it down. I hope they sell, they're a lovely couple, but it's just crazy.
Inside the M25 might as well be another country !!!
Out here in the real world we are hoping policymakers will look outside of London !!!!

Thankyou4calling

10,606 posts

173 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
powerstroke said:
Inside the M25 might as well be another country !!!
Out here in the real world we are hoping policymakers will look outside of London !!!!
Living in Bedford house prices are just back to 2007 levels and sales volumes are around half. No shortage at all, if anything an oversupply with many developments still being marketed long after completion. I travel a lot and that's typical of huge amounts of the country. We have very short memories for these things. London is completely different.

johnfm

13,668 posts

250 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
When is a mod going to amend the thread title from 'fall' to 'rise'?

'there will be no more boom and bust'

Yeah, right.

Randy Winkman

16,139 posts

189 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Boom and bust is fundamental to capitalism isn't it?

turbobloke

103,963 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Boom and bust is fundamental to capitalism isn't it?
As per the continuous lingering bust and bust of communism?

NailedOn

3,114 posts

235 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Randy Winkman said:
Boom and bust is fundamental to capitalism isn't it?
As per the continuous lingering bust and bust of communism?

turbobloke

103,963 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
You can't beat a great bust.

Randy Winkman

16,139 posts

189 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Randy Winkman said:
Boom and bust is fundamental to capitalism isn't it?
As per the continuous lingering bust and bust of communism?
I'm not suggesting Communism is better (I don't think it is), just highlighting something about capitalism. I've just read that Rockerfeller made his dough (and possibly became the richest fella ever) when load of people over-stretched themselves buying oil fields which then collapsed in price (something like that anyway). He was a big success, owning 90% of the market, because a load of people "screwed" up. He won, they lost. The "bust" is part of capitalism isn't it? Some people do well from it.

turbobloke

103,963 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
turbobloke said:
Randy Winkman said:
Boom and bust is fundamental to capitalism isn't it?
As per the continuous lingering bust and bust of communism?
I'm not suggesting Communism is better (I don't think it is), just highlighting something about capitalism. I've just read that Rockerfeller made his dough (and possibly became the richest fella ever) when load of people over-stretched themselves buying oil fields which then collapsed in price (something like that anyway). He was a big success, owning 90% of the market, because a load of people "screwed" up. He won, they lost. The "bust" is part of capitalism isn't it? Some people do well from it.
Cyclic movements in an economy like ours seem inevitable, sentiment matters and unless optimism and pessimism are abolished, boom and bust won't be abolished.

Randy Winkman

16,139 posts

189 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Cyclic movements in an economy like ours seem inevitable, sentiment matters and unless optimism and pessimism are abolished, boom and bust won't be abolished.
Fair enough. If someone can afford it, the main concern when buying a terraced house in West London for £x million is "Will it be worth more next year?".

turbobloke

103,963 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
turbobloke said:
Cyclic movements in an economy like ours seem inevitable, sentiment matters and unless optimism and pessimism are abolished, boom and bust won't be abolished.
Fair enough. If someone can afford it, the main concern when buying a terraced house in West London for £x million is "Will it be worth more next year?".
Surely the question is "how much more will it be worth next year" wink

brickwall

5,250 posts

210 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
New to this thread, but it's all very interesting to watch for me.

I've viewed a few properties in the 400-450k bracket in Wimbledon recently - every one I've viewed has had multiple young couples looking round at the same time as me. Every one I've viewed has gone within a week, at ~3-4% above asking.

There's obviously huge Bank of Mum and Dad support going on - £110k deposits magic'd up by a pair of 27 year olds. So two causes for concern:
a) How much of that support is loan vs. gift? How many of these BOMAD loans are being disclosed to the mortgage lenders?
b) Many of the Mums and Dads will have housing wealth but not incomes to match. My hunch is not that many will have £100k spare - instead they're raising it through re-mortaging the family home.

I'm reasonably confident the bubble will deflate, but how, and when, I just can't work out.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
brickwall said:
New to this thread, but it's all very interesting to watch for me.

I've viewed a few properties in the 400-450k bracket in Wimbledon recently - every one I've viewed has had multiple young couples looking round at the same time as me. Every one I've viewed has gone within a week, at ~3-4% above asking.

There's obviously huge Bank of Mum and Dad support going on - £110k deposits magic'd up by a pair of 27 year olds. So two causes for concern:
a) How much of that support is loan vs. gift? How many of these BOMAD loans are being disclosed to the mortgage lenders?
b) Many of the Mums and Dads will have housing wealth but not incomes to match. My hunch is not that many will have £100k spare - instead they're raising it through re-mortaging the family home.

I'm reasonably confident the bubble will deflate, but how, and when, I just can't work out.
Stories like this won't help you, I'm afraid.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27425255


brickwall

5,250 posts

210 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Stories like this won't help you, I'm afraid.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27425255
Yes I saw that one! laugh

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Where are you looking?

brickwall

5,250 posts

210 months

Sunday 18th May 2014
quotequote all
Wimbledon/Southfields area.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED