Welfare Card

Author
Discussion

elster

Original Poster:

17,517 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
There is going to be a 10 minute rule motion at 12.30 today.

This is by Alec Shelbrooke to discuss having a benefits card that would not be allowed to buy cigarettes and alcohol.

What are you views on this?

I'm not sure this would work as you would then get a black market running, although in principle I do like the idea.


Hoofy

76,366 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
'Ere, mate, wanna swap this frozen chicken for a packet of fags?

TTwiggy

11,538 posts

204 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Booze and fags are very heavily taxed. If we want to get most of 'our' money back from benefit claimants, then surely they should be encouraged to purchase these items?

elster

Original Poster:

17,517 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
It seems a bill is to be prepared.

Friday 25th January 2013

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
fking terrible idea for 2 reasons

1 Would you trust our glorious leaders not to roll this out to everyone that receives some money from the state such as pensioners and then roll it out to everyone so you can only buy government approved goods.

2 Just down the road from us is a little honesty box run by a farm where you take the veg they have grown and drop your cash into a little lock box. we buy all our veg from here due to the high quality and low price. How would we use this if we were on the dole?. We couldn't so we would be forced to buy st at tescos which is further away and more expensive.



I know i will get shouted down by those that want to see anyone unemployed shot on sight who will support this idea.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
I know i will get shouted down by those that want to see anyone unemployed shot on sight who will support this idea.
I think the first idea is a little paranoid (even for someone as cynical as I) but your second argument is spot on.

RH

grumbledoak

31,535 posts

233 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
No point in this at all.

Well, there is. It will create a load of extra red tape and no doubt a shockingly sprawling and expensive IT system to run it. i.e. jobs for the boys.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Why should people living off benefits be allowed luxuries?

Maybe if they had to work for their fix, more people would seek employment.

grumbledoak

31,535 posts

233 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Kozy said:
Why should people living off benefits be allowed luxuries?
How are you going to stop them?

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Kozy said:
Why should people living off benefits be allowed luxuries?

Maybe if they had to work for their fix, more people would seek employment.
OK, I'll bite. On what, exactly, are you basing this viewpoint?

BOR

4,702 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
God forbid I ever have to claim any of the thousands I've paid into this system, but if I do, I would consider it a personal favour, if some vile little Tory bh-boy declined to tell me how I spend my money that I previously paid in.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
No point in this at all.

Well, there is. It will create a load of extra red tape and no doubt a shockingly sprawling and expensive IT system to run it. i.e. jobs for the boys.
And of course there would be no backhanders to a minister to get the welfare card contract


Yes i'm looking at you Tescos

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Kozy said:
Why should people living off benefits be allowed luxuries?

Maybe if they had to work for their fix, more people would seek employment.
OK, I'll bite. On what, exactly, are you basing this viewpoint?
The Daily Mail?

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Pothole said:
OK, I'll bite. On what, exactly, are you basing this viewpoint?
I know plenty of people, personally, that do not 'have' to work because everything they want and need is paid for them.

Start removing little luxuries like this from their 'gratis catalogue' and perhaps when they can't have what they want, only what they need, the value of employment may start to rise.

Plus, it used to boil my piss seeing my 'disabled' alcoholic neighbour getting stfaced every single day. Why the fk should we pay for people like that? It's not a disability, it's a stty lifestyle choice.

While dishing these cards out to anyone in receipt of any benefits is undoubtedly unfair, I think introducing this to the long term unemployed is a great idea. Classed as fit for work, but unemployed for anything over 6 months, you lose your luxuries.


Edited by Kozy on Tuesday 18th December 13:21

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
Pothole said:
Kozy said:
Why should people living off benefits be allowed luxuries?

Maybe if they had to work for their fix, more people would seek employment.
OK, I'll bite. On what, exactly, are you basing this viewpoint?
The Daily Mail?
That would be my guess. It's laughable, really, this apparent concept that everyone who is claiming any benefits is automatically living the life of Riley and doing nothing to find work.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Pothole said:
hat would be my guess. It's laughable, really, this apparent concept that everyone who is claiming any benefits is automatically living the life of Riley and doing nothing to find work.
I sees it. With me own eyes. I don't read the Mail.

Anyone with any form of their own income, would have their own money to buy their luxuries with. Sop no, it's not 'anyone on any benefits' at all.

Edited by Kozy on Tuesday 18th December 13:23

Bunglist

545 posts

230 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
This could work.

Get all of the supermarkets on board and only allow the benefit scroungers to buy fresh produce such as fruit veg.

They want luxuries, go out and earn a living like the rest of us.

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
fking terrible idea for 2 reasons

1 Would you trust our glorious leaders not to roll this out to everyone that receives some money from the state such as pensioners and then roll it out to everyone so you can only buy government approved goods.

2 Just down the road from us is a little honesty box run by a farm where you take the veg they have grown and drop your cash into a little lock box. we buy all our veg from here due to the high quality and low price. How would we use this if we were on the dole?. We couldn't so we would be forced to buy st at tescos which is further away and more expensive.



I know i will get shouted down by those that want to see anyone unemployed shot on sight who will support this idea.
The first bit is a crazy conspiracy theory. The torys are in power, not those evil red-ties!

The third bit was apparently an accurate prediction, good old pistonheads.

BoRED S2upid

19,704 posts

240 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Its never going to work it will be against someone human rights to refuse them fags someone in Belgium will have something to say im sure.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Its never going to work it will be against someone human rights to refuse them fags
Is it?

Food, water, sanitation, shelter etc. Those are human rights.

Fags? Really?

Or did my sarcasm detector fail?