Lost Prophets singer charged
Discussion
Finlandia said:
AshVX220 said:
Art0ir said:
Greenwich Ross said:
AshVX220 said:
hornetrider said:
The Black Flash said:
Welshman? Animal Pornograhy? And no-one made the obvious sheep jokes yet? I am disapoint.
Disappoint.....If your gonna fix it, fix it properly!
okgo said:
There are enough people on those comment sites saying these things long enough ago to make me think that its actually true.
Bit of a dangerous assumption. All that a quick glance at those comments tells me for certain is that he associates with a lot of crazy people. Maybe they've been making up 'he touches kids' accusations for so long that someone finally reported them to the police? Innocent until proven guilty and all that.hairykrishna said:
Bit of a dangerous assumption. All that a quick glance at those comments tells me for certain is that he associates with a lot of crazy people. Maybe they've been making up 'he touches kids' accusations for so long that someone finally reported them to the police? Innocent until proven guilty and all that.
Well, there's photo evidence of him sucking cock on the internet so that part is at least true. He wouldn't have been remanded unless it was extremely serious. Pete Townshend and Gary Glitter weren't remanded as far as I can remember.Oakey said:
hairykrishna said:
Bit of a dangerous assumption. All that a quick glance at those comments tells me for certain is that he associates with a lot of crazy people. Maybe they've been making up 'he touches kids' accusations for so long that someone finally reported them to the police? Innocent until proven guilty and all that.
Well, there's photo evidence of him sucking cock on the internet so that part is at least true. He wouldn't have been remanded unless it was extremely serious. Pete Townshend and Gary Glitter weren't remanded as far as I can remember.Oakey said:
No, that message board was going on about he likes teh cock amongst everything else
Ah, I think we might be putting the cart before the horse there. I can't be sure, but the internet rumours / pictures came about quite a while ago, before someone mentioned it on that site.Rather than anyone on that site claiming he sucked cock and then it being 'proven' later on.
hairykrishna said:
Oakey said:
No, that message board was going on about he likes teh cock amongst everything else
Someone on there also claimed he raped a unicorn and has three penises. Proof of one thing doesn't imply that the others are necessarily true.it is rather a coincidence that people were posting regarding him & two young women abusing children, which is exactly who have been charged.
not that i'm insinuating a coincidence is grounds for arrest, but it is a coincidence all the same.
im said:
How come the 2 females also charged/involved haven't been named? I know he's the famous one but their role is just as sinister (if not more so) as when females are involved they're usually the ones doing the procurring.
I am only guessing, but I would think they are the mothers of the intended victims - if it's true and their identity is being protected for the sake of their children, rather for their sake. im said:
How come the 2 females also charged/involved haven't been named? I know he's the famous one but their role is just as sinister (if not more so) as when females are involved they're usually the ones doing the procurring.
I had the same thought, but as mentioned earlier in the thread it could be (most likely is) that they are related in some way to the child.The band have said how shocked they are, surely if he had hsitory they'd have been ready for it, but then they could just be trying to distance themselvees in some small way.
im said:
How come the 2 females also charged/involved haven't been named? I know he's the famous one but their role is just as sinister (if not more so) as when females are involved they're usually the ones doing the procurring.
someone with more legal knowledge than i said this may be due to the females being relations of the abused, ie their mothers.again in the other web forum this was the accusation leveled at him nearly a year ago.
petemurphy said:
Getragdogleg said:
Is the "making" bit of that not just the act of printing it out or storing it ? In all the cases of people fiddling with kids locally when you read about it in the local rag I noticed they are always charged with this even if they have not actually touched any kids.
What is the legal definition ? is my interpretation correct or does it actually mean they got the old camera out and took the pics ?
you could be making them right now - if an image appears on your screen even for a milisecond and even if its off the screen that you cant see its making - no cameras are involved..What is the legal definition ? is my interpretation correct or does it actually mean they got the old camera out and took the pics ?
king stupid. Surely Making should be the actual taking of horrible pictures. Seems illogical.
AshVX220 said:
The band have said how shocked they are, surely if he had hsitory they'd have been ready for it
Come on, what did you expect: "Sad to hear our mate's been caught kiddy-fiddling, we'd heard a few rumours and seen some pictures on his laptop but we didn't take it much seriously".Art0ir said:
AshVX220 said:
The band have said how shocked they are, surely if he had hsitory they'd have been ready for it
Come on, what did you expect: "Sad to hear our mate's been caught kiddy-fiddling, we'd heard a few rumours and seen some pictures on his laptop but we didn't take it much seriously".Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff