Lost Prophets singer charged
Discussion
I don't get this whole conspire thing. How do you bring something like that up with another person, who may just turn out to have at least 1 good brain cell in their head and shop you in.
It beggars belief that these people manage to find like minded others. Its not like you start a topic on a forum.
It beggars belief that these people manage to find like minded others. Its not like you start a topic on a forum.
barker22 said:
I don't get this whole conspire thing. How do you bring something like that up with another person, who may just turn out to have at least 1 good brain cell in their head and shop you in.
It beggars belief that these people manage to find like minded others. Its not like you start a topic on a forum.
I agree, although I would imagine there are ways through the internet, but then I would rather not know what they are.It beggars belief that these people manage to find like minded others. Its not like you start a topic on a forum.
This story hasn't been mentioned on the tv news yet, why is that?
(Precis - Ian Watkins has not presently been convicted of anything and should be regarded as being innocent.)
I am not a parent, but reading the words "raping a one-year old" left me feeling a mixture of genuine physical nausea, frustrated anger and close to tears.
The natural reaction of an adult to a one-year old should be to protect it from harm shouldn't it? I know that child abusers concoct a narrative that the children are enjoying it or were asking for it or whatever but that just cannot apply in this case; no one could possibly persuade themselves that this type of offence was in any way anything other than 100% wrong, evil behaviour.
I'm the one here who will always take issue with anyone wishing physical harm to be done to convicted criminals and I will stick to that here. I wouldn't however object to anyone convicted of the offence described to be held in solitary for perpetuity and forever more be considered a risk to society.
Let's hope the child in question has not been physically harmed and is too young to remember anything, is brought up in a supportive and loving family and never knows anything of these events.
I am not a parent, but reading the words "raping a one-year old" left me feeling a mixture of genuine physical nausea, frustrated anger and close to tears.
The natural reaction of an adult to a one-year old should be to protect it from harm shouldn't it? I know that child abusers concoct a narrative that the children are enjoying it or were asking for it or whatever but that just cannot apply in this case; no one could possibly persuade themselves that this type of offence was in any way anything other than 100% wrong, evil behaviour.
I'm the one here who will always take issue with anyone wishing physical harm to be done to convicted criminals and I will stick to that here. I wouldn't however object to anyone convicted of the offence described to be held in solitary for perpetuity and forever more be considered a risk to society.
Let's hope the child in question has not been physically harmed and is too young to remember anything, is brought up in a supportive and loving family and never knows anything of these events.
The comments lower down the page, written 11 months ago, make some interesting reading today.
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
Probably best if we don't discuss the stuff posted on that fan page. It's definitely prejudicial to a trial, especially the unicorns and robots, and the bit where he has three penises.
I'm quite surprised how common knowledge the stuff those groupies are chatting about seems to be among them.
I'm quite surprised how common knowledge the stuff those groupies are chatting about seems to be among them.
rah1888 said:
The comments lower down the page, written 11 months ago, make some interesting reading today.
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
That's about the first thing I've seen today that might lead me to think its bullst. Some of the posters on that site come across as nutters with an axle to grind.http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
Getragdogleg said:
A 1 year old ? Wow, what the hell is wrong with him ?
We all know some young girls act more mature and you need to have your wits about you when out clubbing and the like but actually wanting to have sex with a baby is quite disturbing.
Prison is probably not the answer for this guy if found guilty, a mental health facility is more suited as it is clear that his brain has got a few of its wired links quite bady crossed.
Whoa. 1? I read 13 somewhere which is pretty bad but 1 is a whole different level of bad! We all know some young girls act more mature and you need to have your wits about you when out clubbing and the like but actually wanting to have sex with a baby is quite disturbing.
Prison is probably not the answer for this guy if found guilty, a mental health facility is more suited as it is clear that his brain has got a few of its wired links quite bady crossed.
P-Jay said:
That's about the first thing I've seen today that might lead me to think its bullst. Some of the posters on that site come across as nutters with an axle to grind.
Well without wanting to think about the details, the charge of "making and distributing indecent images of children" would involve a degree of self-incrimination no?Art0ir said:
P-Jay said:
That's about the first thing I've seen today that might lead me to think its bullst. Some of the posters on that site come across as nutters with an axle to grind.
Well without wanting to think about the details, the charge of "making and distributing indecent images of children" would involve a degree of self-incrimination no?What is the legal definition ? is my interpretation correct or does it actually mean they got the old camera out and took the pics ?
Art0ir said:
Well without wanting to think about the details, the charge of "making and distributing indecent images of children" would involve a degree of self-incrimination no?
I've only read "downloading and distributing" which I take is 'just' being a member of say Limewire.The whole thing is just horrible, not because I was a passing fan of the band or that I live reasonably close to him, just the idea of the poor victims, I hoping it all turns out to be BS.
rah1888 said:
The comments lower down the page, written 11 months ago, make some interesting reading today.
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
Either:http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_74997/ian-watkins/
Someone has an axe to grind
Or
He's sick
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff