Lost Prophets singer charged

Author
Discussion

Conian

8,030 posts

201 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
this a fked up world

rah1888

1,547 posts

187 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Oakey said:
I've just noticed that he was remanded and refused bail. Is that normal for these sort of charges or does this suggest they have some serious evidence that makes him a danger?
Probably the safest place for him right now.

jules_s

4,287 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Oakey said:
I've just noticed that he was remanded and refused bail. Is that normal for these sort of charges or does this suggest they have some serious evidence that makes him a danger?
IME they have some pretty serious stuff on him to remand without bail.

Oakey

27,576 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
According to the Sun;

"Making an application for all three to be refused bail, prosecutor Mrs Suzanne Thomas said: “They are the sort of charges which will cause public revulsion. The penalty would be a custodial sentence if they were found guilty.”

and

"Thomas Crowther, defending Watkins, said: “None of these offences are admitted. He has no previous convictions and is a man of clean character.”




EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
He's got a previous record:
A Thousand Apologies

Awkward

...And Then She Told Me To Leave


I think he did it.

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_did_Joanne_Nikita_Ma...


i hope for his sake its just one sick nutter, if not, he's fked.

also, now his name is out, custody is probably safer.

GALLARDOGUY

8,160 posts

219 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Why is he named yet the women charged keep their anonymity?

Oakey

27,576 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Because it's their kids he nonced.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Because it's their kids he nonced.
I don't understand that page "Who's dating who". Its like a lot of the "11 months ago" comments were just written today? Is it some kind of wind up?

Anyway, from that page: "i guarantee that nobody besides jo and shannon will make statements because they let him mess with their kids and like you said, he threatens them"

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Nyphur said:
I don't understand that page "Who's dating who". Its like a lot of the "11 months ago" comments were just written today? Is it some kind of wind up?

Anyway, from that page: "i guarantee that nobody besides jo and shannon will make statements because they let him mess with their kids and like you said, he threatens them"
no idea, but it looks bad either way.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Because it's their kids he nonced.
why are they arrested as well then? unless they were taking pics of their own children and emailing him

Art0ir

9,401 posts

170 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Pesty said:
why are they arrested as well then? unless they were taking pics of their own children and emailing him
Perhaps they were part of the "conspiracy" bit.

Oakey

27,576 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Pesty said:
why are they arrested as well then? unless they were taking pics of their own children and emailing him
Well if you read the comments he was supposedly offering girls money to rape with their kids.

ruz316

109 posts

159 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Something needs to be done about this white culture of noncing kids

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
ruz316 said:
Something needs to be done about this white culture of noncing kids
not sure if serious?

wiffmaster

2,603 posts

198 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
jules_s said:
IME they have some pretty serious stuff on him to remand without bail.
That and they probably consider it fairly likely that, were he to be bailed, he'd probably top himself before he stood trial.

coogy

955 posts

211 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Isn't Fern Cotton due to have his baby fairly soon?

jules_s

4,287 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
wiffmaster said:
jules_s said:
IME they have some pretty serious stuff on him to remand without bail.
That and they probably consider it fairly likely that, were he to be bailed, he'd probably top himself before he stood trial.
Two fold in my experience.

He will either do a runner given his wealth....and/or they have got some web activity on him and are searching for more before going to trial.

Quhet

2,421 posts

146 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
If this is all true, it's fking nauseating.

Rollcage

11,327 posts

192 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
coogy said:
Isn't Fern Cotton due to have his baby fairly soon?
No.