Public sector watch

[V8mate]

Countdown said:

Despite what your ex, your sister, and your mum might believe - unless their employer has the same PAYE reference they are NOT the "same" employer.

I am surprised that so many "PH Directors" don't appear to understand what does and doesn't constitute an "employer".

I bet all those employers provide the same pension fund though

And continuous service when transferring from one trust to another.

[V8mate]

REALIST123 said:

5CylTurbo said:

Fab32 said:

I see you have crawled out from under your rock to talk more rubbish, you have proved yourself to know nothing about teaching and teachers already when you had to back track and edit your previous posts when you were proved to be talking rubbish about OFSTED.

I’m still looking forward to you answering my questions, any chance?

For the hard of understanding

I didn't edit anything about Ofsted you functational twit

'Functational'?

You knows it, bro'

[V8mate]

James_B said:

eccles said:

So you're saying if someone in the private sector gets promoted up to the next rank they don't get a pay rise?

No, I'm not saying that at all, and can't work out why you'd suggest it. Increments, that's what I'm talking about "you've done two years in this job, you get an extra point now and an increase in pay".

Maybe it's called banding, or spine points, but it was the norm when I was a civil servant and I still hear of other people getting similar now. No promotion, no change in job, just an extra year in, and so an increase in pay.

Much of the public sector did away with that approach a long time ago.

People were moved to performance-related pay but, as the public sector is almost entirely unable to objectively approach evaluating people's performance, 99% of staff in those schemes just get the cost-of-living rise - which has been capped at 1% for 5(?) years.