North Korea - how serious should we take them?
Discussion
Countdown said:
bristolracer said:
I have no doubt that the North Koreans (or anyone else) could develop missiles given the above.
Given that he has not much of either, I believe his missiles are all show rather than go, but I dont for one minute believe that he cannot build them given resources and money.
They're reputed to have pretty good missile tech actually. Exports are booming......Given that he has not much of either, I believe his missiles are all show rather than go, but I dont for one minute believe that he cannot build them given resources and money.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim...
Countdown said:
They're reputed to have pretty good missile tech actually. Exports are booming......
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim...
A list of bad-boy countries if ever I saw one.https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim...
Sounds like he must have some extremely important missile parts waiting to get through.
He knows his broadcasts are monitored, and he knows there are sympathetic ears out there that may be willing to push the UN towards humanitarian sanction lifting, or to even break the blockade itself.
Ultimately, the answer is staring him in the face - surrender the nuke program to Biden and we can all move on. But that means 'losing' face too. And that is something a NK leader would never consider.
He knows his broadcasts are monitored, and he knows there are sympathetic ears out there that may be willing to push the UN towards humanitarian sanction lifting, or to even break the blockade itself.
Ultimately, the answer is staring him in the face - surrender the nuke program to Biden and we can all move on. But that means 'losing' face too. And that is something a NK leader would never consider.
jsf said:
robinessex said:
What chance would his starving soldiers stand against the USA if it came to a punch up?
Same chance as always, they would drag them into a jungle bloodbath if they were stupid enough to get involved on the ground.mko9 said:
jsf said:
robinessex said:
What chance would his starving soldiers stand against the USA if it came to a punch up?
Same chance as always, they would drag them into a jungle bloodbath if they were stupid enough to get involved on the ground.Gecko1978 said:
mko9 said:
jsf said:
robinessex said:
What chance would his starving soldiers stand against the USA if it came to a punch up?
Same chance as always, they would drag them into a jungle bloodbath if they were stupid enough to get involved on the ground.I've said this a couple of times in this thread
The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
bristolracer said:
I've said this a couple of times in this thread
The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
I pretty much agree with this. With no Chinese intervention, the West would win but the cost of any war to the South Koreans would be devastation.The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
Iamnotkloot said:
bristolracer said:
I've said this a couple of times in this thread
The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
I pretty much agree with this. With no Chinese intervention, the West would win but the cost of any war to the South Koreans would be devastation.The NK threat comes from conventional artillery which has the range to hit Seoul
They could inflict massive damage on many border SK towns and cities using WW2 technology.
For the US to locate and destroy every artillery battery would be impossible
Sure the war wouldn't last long, it wouldn't take the Yanks long to pulverise NK but the cost to South Koreans would be massive.
The Chinese are the ones keeping a lid on it all right now, they do not want the Americans turning up in their back yard, but are happy enough to let NK irritate the west.
If the Russians and Chinese haven’t been sending newer stock regularly, I wouldn’t be confident of fighting for very long time with ammunition that might be decades old.
Coupled with this news about famine, perhaps the NK’s army might not be as keen to fight as their leader and generals would like everyone to believe
Edited by dukeboy749r on Monday 12th April 07:16
HTP99 said:
robinessex said:
I'd love to know what their working day actually consists of, that's a st load of generals. Why don't South Korea just buy a whole load of C-RAM to at least partially counter the long known threat of NK artillery?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMFzlwzFgKw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMFzlwzFgKw
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff