North Korea - how serious should we take them?
Discussion
shih tzu faced said:
Snoggledog said:
You're both quite right in that his kingdom would fall very quickly after the USA got involved. But the point still stands. He does have the capacity to virtually level Seoul.
Totally agree, wasn’t arguing robinessex said:
shih tzu faced said:
Snoggledog said:
You're both quite right in that his kingdom would fall very quickly after the USA got involved. But the point still stands. He does have the capacity to virtually level Seoul.
Totally agree, wasn’t arguing I'm still amazed that North Korea isn't the most undemocratic country in the world according to the democracy index
https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
105.4 said:
How many rounds could an artillery piece fire before barrels or firing mechanisms needed replacing?
Western artillery, a couple of thousand rounds is the goal before a barrel replacement (given a decent barrel, not guaranteed to be the case here, obviously). Russian, a bit less, as some evidence suggests in Ukraine.
NK? Your guess is as good as anyone's.
jimmyjimjim said:
Western artillery, a couple of thousand rounds is the goal before a barrel replacement (given a decent barrel, not guaranteed to be the case here, obviously).
Russian, a bit less, as some evidence suggests in Ukraine.
NK? Your guess is as good as anyone's.
Thanks Jim Russian, a bit less, as some evidence suggests in Ukraine.
NK? Your guess is as good as anyone's.
Which then begs the following question….
It’s often stated that NK could flatten Seoul in a hour or two, but do they really have the working equipment to actually do that?
I’m assuming that artillery rounds ‘go bad’ if not properly maintained and stored correctly?
105.4 said:
Thanks Jim
Which then begs the following question….
It’s often stated that NK could flatten Seoul in a hour or two, but do they really have the working equipment to actually do that?
I’m assuming that artillery rounds ‘go bad’ if not properly maintained and stored correctly?
Aren’t they flogging all their ammunition to Russia?Which then begs the following question….
It’s often stated that NK could flatten Seoul in a hour or two, but do they really have the working equipment to actually do that?
I’m assuming that artillery rounds ‘go bad’ if not properly maintained and stored correctly?
Triumph Man said:
I'm still amazed that North Korea isn't the most undemocratic country in the world according to the democracy index
https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
Well NK does have "Democratic" in its name, and they do hold 'elections' (with one party on the ballot and at gunpoint) so perhaps that gives then at least one point?https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
China, Saudi and Qatar on the lower rungs too.
Previous said:
Triumph Man said:
I'm still amazed that North Korea isn't the most undemocratic country in the world according to the democracy index
https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
Well NK does have "Democratic" in its name, and they do hold 'elections' (with one party on the ballot and at gunpoint) so perhaps that gives then at least one point?https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
Eritrea must be really, really st
Come on Kim, you need to pump those numbers up (or down), those are rookie numbers
China, Saudi and Qatar on the lower rungs too.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff