Anjem Choudary
Discussion
jmorgan said:
Jimbeaux said:
Mr_B said:
Jimbeaux said:
He was on a US news interview a couple of weeks back explaining how Sharia is coming to our shores and there is really nothing we can do about it. The advert that follwed was for erectile dysfunction.
He calls himself a judge at one of the many civil sharia courts already operating in the UK. Perhaps that says as much about them as it does him.Though I expect someone more in the know might know.
Blue383 said:
So, basically he's Judge Judy.
Seriously, shove all these murderous b
ds in the back of a Herc and drop them off in the desert to join the rest of their like-minded chums in their quest for an enlightened islamic society.Or would that be a violation of their 'yooman rights'?
For those who missed it, Dan Cruickshank interviewed Choudary for his documentary 'Civilisation Under Attack' on telly last night (now on iPlayer).
As expected, Choudary is unrepentant and welcomes the destruction of cultural sites. For most of the interview he is calm, focussed and answers in a straightforward fashion quoting his interpretation of his faith. As though he really believes.
Right at the end, however, when Dan asks one more time if he has any doubts over this wanton destruction, Choudary lets out a little smile - as if he knows he's playing a part and happy to conform to the received idea of him apologising for outlandish behaviour.
I think he's a wind up merchant and loving his fifteen minutes of fame. Won't end well is my prediction. (I'm referring to Choudary not Dan Cruickshank).
If you watch the doc, there's another scholar/imam who also deconstructs the ISIS position saying that just by videoing the destruction they are themselves spreading the idea of false worship and idolatry, and this is clearly against Koranic teachings.
However, no-one is protecting the ancient sites. And ISIS are selling artefacts!
As expected, Choudary is unrepentant and welcomes the destruction of cultural sites. For most of the interview he is calm, focussed and answers in a straightforward fashion quoting his interpretation of his faith. As though he really believes.
Right at the end, however, when Dan asks one more time if he has any doubts over this wanton destruction, Choudary lets out a little smile - as if he knows he's playing a part and happy to conform to the received idea of him apologising for outlandish behaviour.
I think he's a wind up merchant and loving his fifteen minutes of fame. Won't end well is my prediction. (I'm referring to Choudary not Dan Cruickshank).
If you watch the doc, there's another scholar/imam who also deconstructs the ISIS position saying that just by videoing the destruction they are themselves spreading the idea of false worship and idolatry, and this is clearly against Koranic teachings.
However, no-one is protecting the ancient sites. And ISIS are selling artefacts!
Otispunkmeyer said:
MX7 said:
No you wouldn't. If yo go to Hyde Park on a Sunday you'll hear far worse, and they don't get arrested.
The best thing to do is EVERYONE ignores him.
Or a crack team of ex military types, not too dissimilar to the A-Team, take him in the night and dump him in a remote, undisclosed location many thousands of miles away. No one will miss him. The best thing to do is EVERYONE ignores him.
Wail got it too
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3185837/An...
Give a man enough rope..........
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3185837/An...
Give a man enough rope..........
I'm sure whatever he's 'done' (i.e. charged with) is largely the same as he's been doing for far longer than the investigation. My point is that the victory here is not only the charging of this individual but the apparent change in attitude of the authorities and establishment. Let us hope we are seeing an end to the farce of certain minorities being somehow exempt from scrutiny or prosecution of crimes.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff