Another naughty teacher

[dundarach]

Dave Allen did it years ago

[otolith]

Ayahuasca said:

GhostDriver said:

otolith said:

I suspect that the root of the double standard in the perception of abuse is the stud/slut double standard applied to promiscuous behaviour in males and females.

Perfect explanation of this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6UAtYlo7Io

He has a point.

He seems a little less pissed than he was when I last saw him on stage.

[MrBrightSi]

Tiggsy said:

errrr....while the first half of your post makes sense, calling someone who likes 16 year olds a paedo is on a par with idiots that murder pediatricians.

MrBrightSi said:

I'm afraid anyone who wants to touch people up under 16 is a paedophile in the eyes of the law, irrespective if you want to let them off because they might let you have a bounce.

[CBR JGWRR]

Moonhawk said:

Your description of teenage girls differs considerably from my experience with my female peers in the 1980s and also differs from that of my wife's own experiences as a teenage girl, hanging around with other teenage girls back in the 1970s.

A lot has changed since then...

[Rich_W]

MrBrightSi said:

I'm afraid anyone who wants to touch people up under 16 is a paedophile in the eyes of the law, irrespective if you want to let them off because they might let you have a bounce.

Point of law.

If the victim is under 16 but over 13. The perpetrator is a rapist. Under 13 is a Paedophile

HTH

FWIW One of my exes lost her virginity at 14 to her then BF. NO not me. (IIRC he was 16-18ish) Made no odds to her mental state at the time or since. They were as "in love" as you'll get at that age. I gather she wore the trousers Would it have been right to find him guilty?

Edited by Rich_W on Monday 2nd December 21:56

[Tiggsy]

MrBrightSi said:

Tiggsy said:

errrr....while the first half of your post makes sense, calling someone who likes 16 year olds a paedo is on a par with idiots that murder pediatricians.

MrBrightSi said:

I'm afraid anyone who wants to touch people up under 16 is a paedophile in the eyes of the law, irrespective if you want to let them off because they might let you have a bounce.

you're wrong.

[MrBrightSi]

Tiggsy said:

you're wrong.

yes. yes I am.

[spitsfire]

MrBrightSi said:

Tiggsy said:

you're wrong.

yes. yes I am.

Yes you are, Si. Tiggsy, you wouldn't be a teacher by any chance?

[Moonhawk]

CBR JGWRR said:

A lot has changed since then...

In what way - have teenage girls become much more nieve and immature since the 1970s/1980s (more so than teenage boys over the same period).

Edited by Moonhawk on Wednesday 4th December 12:35

[Tiggsy]

spitsfire said:

MrBrightSi said:

Tiggsy said:

you're wrong.

yes. yes I am.

Yes you are, Si. Tiggsy, you wouldn't be a teacher by any chance?

I'm not...although my ability to spot the dunce and correct them does seem to make me ideal

[BlackLabel]

And she avoids jail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568580/Wo...

[fourpointsixgt]

BlackLabel said:

And she avoids jail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568580/Wo...

Double standards.
Quite a looker though, why didn't she just have an affair with a married fellow teacher or something, I mean, 16y/o boys are hopeless in the sack, I know I was. And having popped 3 kids out, wizard's sleeve. Poor lad wouldn't have touched the sides.

[New POD]

DanielSan said:

Victor McDade said:

A dream come true for a schoolboy that age.

Edited by Victor McDade on Saturday 30th November 17:20

Who made the complaint? If I was a 16 year old and a teacher who looked like that came onto me I'd be fking delighted, not complaining about it.

But if you were a 16 year olds parent ? I'd be quite a little angry.

[Talksteer]

Rich_W said:

MrBrightSi said:

I'm afraid anyone who wants to touch people up under 16 is a paedophile in the eyes of the law, irrespective if you want to let them off because they might let you have a bounce.

Point of law.

If the victim is under 16 but over 13. The perpetrator is a rapist. Under 13 is a Paedophile

HTH

FWIW One of my exes lost her virginity at 14 to her then BF. NO not me. (IIRC he was 16-18ish) Made no odds to her mental state at the time or since. They were as "in love" as you'll get at that age. I gather she wore the trousers Would it have been right to find him guilty?

Not quite right there, if the girl is 13-16 she is deemed capable of consent. You will have committed a offense of illegal sex with an underage person. If they are under 13 they can't give consent hence crime is rape.

The law makes no mention of the word paedophile which technically is the attraction to prepubescent children which generally doesn't apply at the upper end of age of consent issues.

[NPI]

New POD said:

But if you were a 16 year olds parent ? I'd be quite a little angry.

His Dad seems a bit pissed that he didn't get a chance with her!

[MitchT]

I read this one recently and could only find myself wondering why this kind of stuff wasn't happening when I was at school. Feel like I missed out!

[Oakey]

You have to wonder what's going through her mind to ruin her life like that. If he looked older than his years that might be understandable although it'd still be wrong. He, however, looks about 12.

[carinaman]

MitchT said:

I read this one recently and could only find myself wondering why this kind of stuff wasn't happening when I was at school. Feel like I missed out!

What is it with Wales:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lindsay-black...

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/444441/Teacher-ba...

This case is less amusing and in England:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Lympstone-ba...

[TwigtheWonderkid]

Guam said:

Ayahuasca said:

Where were all these naughty teachers when I was at school?

They were at your school. You just didn't notice as they were only after the good looking kids.

[Grandpad58]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rls8cfomkBQ&fea...