Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"
Discussion
The principle behind the homing beacon on the black box is that you already know roughly were it is because it's surrounded by wreckage, separating the black box from the airframe would normally make it harder to find. Not that finding the wreck or the box is normally the problem, this is a very unusual case.
Dr Jekyll said:
The principle behind the homing beacon on the black box is that you already know roughly were it is because it's surrounded by wreckage, separating the black box from the airframe would normally make it harder to find. Not that finding the wreck or the box is normally the problem, this is a very unusual case.
If you were to go for some system that automatically jettisoned a black box under certain circumstances, surely one of the parameters you would make sure it recorded would be the aircraft's position at the time of impact ? No matter how far the box then drifted it would provide information allowing the wreckage to be found.MartG said:
If you were to go for some system that automatically jettisoned a black box under certain circumstances, surely one of the parameters you would make sure it recorded would be the aircraft's position at the time of impact ? No matter how far the box then drifted it would provide information allowing the wreckage to be found.
Other way round. Airframe big = easier to find, then you're looking for a black box in a small search area. Jettisoned black box = small = difficult to find.marshalla said:
MartG said:
If you were to go for some system that automatically jettisoned a black box under certain circumstances, surely one of the parameters you would make sure it recorded would be the aircraft's position at the time of impact ? No matter how far the box then drifted it would provide information allowing the wreckage to be found.
Other way round. Airframe big = easier to find, then you're looking for a black box in a small search area. Jettisoned black box = small = difficult to find.marshalla said:
MartG said:
Nope - aircraft wreckage at bottom of the sea v. floating box with radio beacon & strobe light - I think I know which would be easier to find
After the batteries die ?10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Ex...
Meanwhile the families lawyer up and Malaysian Airlines subsequently stops supplying them with any aid.
Spares for the Bluefin underwater vehicle should arrive in Australia tomorrow (reported by the Mirror), hopefully this will enable Ocean Shield to get back out searching.
http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/products/bluefin-21...
Its still really early days, hopefully persistence will pay off.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Ex...
Meanwhile the families lawyer up and Malaysian Airlines subsequently stops supplying them with any aid.
Spares for the Bluefin underwater vehicle should arrive in Australia tomorrow (reported by the Mirror), hopefully this will enable Ocean Shield to get back out searching.
http://www.bluefinrobotics.com/products/bluefin-21...
Its still really early days, hopefully persistence will pay off.
Engineer1 said:
To be fair either will be damned difficult to find if the aircraft wasn't on its planned route, floating becons would be OK if they where picked up very quickly otherwise they could end up accidentally sunk or drifted miles. On the bottom they should stay fairly well put just hard to get too.
but they could hold the information pertaining to the GPS position of their release surely.Campo said:
10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...
So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.
kev1974 said:
Campo said:
10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...
So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.
Ozzie Osmond said:
marshalla said:
Airframe big = easier to find.
Also - engines large and heavy so sink very quickly and should give a decent target for search. Personally I think those saying "it will never be found" are talking bunk. But I've been wrong before....
kev1974 said:
Campo said:
10 weeks in and some knob jockey has released a book on MH370 to cash in. wker
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
Someone else is already trying to tout a film around Cannes[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631527/Extraordinary-new-claim-book-missing-MH370-flight-accidentally-SHOT-search-effort-covered-up.html[/url
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/18/movie-about-the-miss...
So far they've knocked together a trailer, that's all.
el stovey said:
Steffan said:
Unexplained loss of all cabin pressure and anoxia seem to be the most probable causes to me.
Doesn't explain the switching off both the transponder and CPDLC though.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff