Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"
Discussion
Thankyou4calling said:
It's far from safe to assume anything. Little strong evidence at all so far so assumptions are based on very flimsy info.
radar picture over Malacca Strait is enough evidence it was manually flown with not the best intention, no known autopilot flies like thatAdeTuono said:
Are you adding this to all your other theories of what definitely happened?
nah, it's already the part of my theory which I don't state it's what really happened, just leave that as a possibility which fits filtering all known factsVaud said:
Lefty said:
What a load of crap.Yes, it is a pretty poor story aimed at selling a book on this subject which hypothesise on the possible causes with absolutely no regard for the facts. A story written purely for profit with no regard for whether there is any evidence to support those suggestions. That is of course one of the problems that the absolute lack of any real evidence or facts being available on the matter can give rise to and in this case it has. Pity.
Steffan said:
Yes, it is a pretty poor story aimed at selling a book on this subject which hypothesise on the possible causes with absolutely no regard for the facts. A story written purely for profit with no regard for whether there is any evidence to support those suggestions. That is of course one of the problems that the absolute lack of any real evidence or facts being available on the matter can give rise to and in this case it has. Pity.
Yes, it is a pretty poor bunch of rehashed replies aimed at keeping a thread going on this subject which hypothesises on the possible causes with absolutely no knowledge of for the facts. Replies often written for the sake of said hypothesis with no regard for whether there is any evidence to support those suggestions. That is of course one of the problems that the absolute lack of any real evidence or facts being available on the matter can give rise to and in this case it has. Pity.
CAPP0 said:
Steffan said:
Yes, it is a pretty poor story aimed at selling a book on this subject which hypothesise on the possible causes with absolutely no regard for the facts. A story written purely for profit with no regard for whether there is any evidence to support those suggestions. That is of course one of the problems that the absolute lack of any real evidence or facts being available on the matter can give rise to and in this case it has. Pity.
Yes, it is a pretty poor bunch of rehashed replies aimed at keeping a thread going on this subject which hypothesises on the possible causes with absolutely no knowledge of for the facts. Replies often written for the sake of said hypothesis with no regard for whether there is any evidence to support those suggestions. That is of course one of the problems that the absolute lack of any real evidence or facts being available on the matter can give rise to and in this case it has. Pity.
Vaud said:
Lefty said:
What a load of crap.eccles said:
Vaud said:
Lefty said:
What a load of crap.I am involved in altitude work, where we reduce the pressure to simulate altitude, and we have PPO2 meter constantly measuring the PPO2 during the operation.
Rollcage said:
The hull of the Cheeki Rafiki was found in pretty short order compared to this!
Ain't that the truth! Regrettably it seems that the demise of this airplane is as yet not certain and it's whereabouts equally unclear. From all the commentary in this case it seems likely to be some time before the facts in this case are known, if these facts are actually ever discovered and made public. I do hope they are to allow closure for the bereaved and an explanation for the airplane business. But who knows when, indeed if, this will be?Rollcage said:
The hull of the Cheeki Rafiki was found in pretty short order compared to this!
Well yeah but in MUCH busier shipping lanes and I believe its crew or seawater entering the boat had set off a distress beacon, if not a beacon they certainly radioed their location before they went down.kev1974 said:
Rollcage said:
The hull of the Cheeki Rafiki was found in pretty short order compared to this!
Well yeah but in MUCH busier shipping lanes and I believe its crew or seawater entering the boat had set off a distress beacon, if not a beacon they certainly radioed their location before they went down.Looks like they have released some of the data from the pings (Inmarsat stuff).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27576409
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27576409
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff