Malaysia Airlines Plane "Loses Contact"
Discussion
c7xlg said:
Awesome...a 777 can get close to 'transient orbit velocity' (whatever that is meant to be). Why did we bother with Concorde for all those years? Shirley as it was over twice as fast, and lots higher than a 777 is MUST have been in full orbit?
I think I can see it all now... 9-11 was ACTUALLY a plot by Boeing & Nasa to get Concorde grounded, therefore removing the competitor to their new generation of 'low cost' orbital entry craft.
That's ridiculous though. 9-11 was 757, and 767's. 777 is a more advanced aircraft than any of your examples so it could have the ability to go trans orbital in a jet stream. I bet the CIA required boeing to build some versions secretly capable of such a feat...I think I can see it all now... 9-11 was ACTUALLY a plot by Boeing & Nasa to get Concorde grounded, therefore removing the competitor to their new generation of 'low cost' orbital entry craft.
dvs_dave said:
That's ridiculous though. 9-11 was 757, and 767's. 777 is a more advanced aircraft than any of your examples so it could have the ability to go trans orbital in a jet stream. I bet the CIA required boeing to build some versions secretly capable of such a feat...
good point DVS_DAVE... and the 9-11 767 did have missiles fitted that it used to shoot the tower before hitting it, so maybe the 777 has a 'turbo' boost like Airwolf had (before the CIA classified it and Stringfellow Hawke had to go all black-ops on them). This presumaly could let them perform a 'go balastic' manoeuvre like Maverick and Goose, and get up to those Transient Orbital velocities and altitudes, albeit with a strong Jet-Stream to assist.Well there is talk out there that several test bed 777's were equipped with concealed JATO rockets with a view to replacing the POTUS AirForce One aircraft. It's conceivable MH370 was one of those very aircraft??? Ignition of these at high altitude in a jet stream would almost certainly result a trans orbital and beyond event.
c7xlg said:
dvs_dave said:
That's ridiculous though. 9-11 was 757, and 767's. 777 is a more advanced aircraft than any of your examples so it could have the ability to go trans orbital in a jet stream. I bet the CIA required boeing to build some versions secretly capable of such a feat...
good point DVS_DAVE... and the 9-11 767 did have missiles fitted that it used to shoot the tower before hitting it, so maybe the 777 has a 'turbo' boost like Airwolf had (before the CIA classified it and Stringfellow Hawke had to go all black-ops on them). This presumably could let them perform a 'go balastic' manoeuvre like Maverick and Goose, and get up to those Transient Orbital velocities and altitudes, albeit with a strong Jet-Stream to assist.anyone seen that 747 recently? There is your proof.
dvs_dave said:
Well there is talk out there that several test bed 777's were equipped with concealed JATO rockets with a view to replacing the POTUS AirForce One aircraft. It's conceivable MH370 was one of those very aircraft??? Ignition of these at high altitude in a jet stream would almost certainly result a trans orbital and beyond event.
dvs_dave said:
Is it not possible that in conjunction with a high speed jet stream tail wind it got itself into a transitional orbit velocity, and then inadvertantly managed to slingshot around the earth sufficient for its speed to increase to full escape velocity? Given the altitude it would have ended up at, any aerodynamic control would have been ineffective due to the air being so thin, so the pilot wouldn't have been able to point the nose down and descend like he was perhaps used to.
I would certainly be interested in any evidence to categorically debunk this notion.
Look up what the escape velocity is.I would certainly be interested in any evidence to categorically debunk this notion.
so called said:
There is actual documented evidence of just such an orbital mishap.
In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
So Called,In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
Don't be such an idiot. That is impossible!!!
Everyone knows it was a B-17 they found not a B-52!!
so called said:
There is actual documented evidence of just such an orbital mishap.
In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
And a London bus.....In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
You lot and your quasi physics (London Bus indeed 
) with no real plausible counters to the theories I'm proposing. Next someone will seriously suggest that it ditched in the ocean without breaking up and sunk below the waves to a point of neutral buoyancy like a submarine and it's still floating around out there below the waves with all onboard slowly suffocating. Now that is a ridiculous theory!
) with no real plausible counters to the theories I'm proposing. Next someone will seriously suggest that it ditched in the ocean without breaking up and sunk below the waves to a point of neutral buoyancy like a submarine and it's still floating around out there below the waves with all onboard slowly suffocating. Now that is a ridiculous theory!dvs_dave said:
it ditched in the ocean without breaking up and sunk below the waves to a point of neutral buoyancy like a submarine and it's still floating around out there below the waves with all onboard slowly suffocating.
And then probably ended up here: http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2014/05/massiv...
AdeTuono said:
so called said:
There is actual documented evidence of just such an orbital mishap.
In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
And a London bus.....In an early edition, the Daily or Sunday Sport reported, with photographic proof, on their front page, the discovery of a missing B52 Flying Fortress that had crash landed on the moon.
The London bus was found at the South Pole, silly.
The paper reported months later that the plane had 'been stolen' from its moon crash site..
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff