UK politics if Scotland votes Yes
Discussion
The only attempt Ive heard of from the Tories to keep Scotland in the union was G. Osbourne presenting something to a half full sports hall in London.
Wouldn't call that a desperate attempt to keep the Union.
For rUK the whole question seems largely irrelevant and the whole thing pretty much stays out the media.
Things may look different north of the border though.
Wouldn't call that a desperate attempt to keep the Union.
For rUK the whole question seems largely irrelevant and the whole thing pretty much stays out the media.
Things may look different north of the border though.
fluffnik said:
ninja-lewis said:
Incidentally the SNP have six MSPs born in England.
...and one born in France. pcvdriver said:
fluffnik said:
ninja-lewis said:
Incidentally the SNP have six MSPs born in England.
...and one born in France. And a bit of an eejit (IMHO).
fluffnik said:
Trident is too dangerous to host in England.
Okaylist the ten ports in england which are more suited to submarines
Next please tell me where the warheads are assembled and maintained
I'll give you a clue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Weapons_Establ...
Just off the A340
https://goo.gl/maps/yLPkN
which as you can see is no where near london
fluffnik said:
The Union is a drain on Scotland and Trident is too dangerous to host in England.
It is pretty much that simple.
Endlessly repeating the same tired, old lies does not make them true. In fact it just makes you look like a moron. It is pretty much that simple.
You have been asked many many many times to provide a credible source for your claims, and you have so far been unable to do that. Either put up or shut up Fluff. At the very least, should you not be looking for a refund from the bogus reverend in Bath, aka Wings Over Scotland? ( your fave source)
pcvdriver said:
Scotland on the whole do not vote Tory enough for us to warrant having a Tory Government.
Following your logic reveals a flaw...... Between one in 5 and one in 6 Scottish voters regularly vote Conservative. In terms of Scottish votes at a general election they are actually broadly on a par with the SNP.......McWigglebum4th said:
fluffnik said:
Trident is too dangerous to host in England.
Okaylist the ten ports in england which are more suited to submarines
Next please tell me where the warheads are assembled and maintained
I'll give you a clue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Weapons_Establ...
Just off the A340
https://goo.gl/maps/yLPkN
which as you can see is no where near london
Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
People who imply Trident is hosted in Scotland as some form of punishment by the nasty english trying to dump nasty stuff on the scots, are truely misguided. It seems they have fallen for the nationalist hate campaign by the SNP to smear the rUK and create divisions where none previously flourished. Selfish and racist! Hope you are proud of your cause.
andymadmak said:
Following your logic reveals a flaw...... Between one in 5 and one in 6 Scottish voters regularly vote Conservative. In terms of Scottish votes at a general election they are actually broadly on a par with the SNP.......
Theres a big misunderstanding that all Scots support Labour, and other left wing organisations. ///ajd said:
Whats more, the Vanguard boats are refitted - including Nuclear de/refuelling etc. - in Devonport, Plymouth, not Faslane.
Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
So there will be no problem removing it from Scotland before Independence Day. Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
Excellent.
fluffnik said:
///ajd said:
Whats more, the Vanguard boats are refitted - including Nuclear de/refuelling etc. - in Devonport, Plymouth, not Faslane.
Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
So there will be no problem removing it from Scotland before Independence Day. Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
Excellent.
Yet again you have proven to be speaking bollcoks
The reason faslane was chosen is like many things.
Scotland is best in this particular case
fluffnik said:
///ajd said:
Whats more, the Vanguard boats are refitted - including Nuclear de/refuelling etc. - in Devonport, Plymouth, not Faslane.
Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
So there will be no problem removing it from Scotland before Independence Day. Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
Excellent.
There only needs to be one nuclear sub base, so everything would have to move south. Faslane, Coulport and all 8000+ jobs would go. You won't need Faslane as a base in the fantasy Scot Navy, as you be able to tie up what you can afford at Broomielaw Quay.
You can pay a deposit of £5Bn upfront on independence day to cover the moving costs over a 10 year period - well you can add it to your debt that as a BBB+ economy, we'll charge you international lending rate +2points. You can top up the loan as the costs inevitably spiral. Think of it as your entry cost to NATO by committing to not cock up a key strategic capability as a side effect of the short sighted racist selfish nationalist wet dream. Of course we have no problem lending to such 'best pals' that just only discriminate against us a bit. We won't mention it (much).
Excellent indeed! That all OK with you?
///ajd said:
fluffnik said:
///ajd said:
Whats more, the Vanguard boats are refitted - including Nuclear de/refuelling etc. - in Devonport, Plymouth, not Faslane.
Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
So there will be no problem removing it from Scotland before Independence Day. Burghfield is where the warheads are assembled, just next to Aldermaston.
Excellent.
There only needs to be one nuclear sub base, so everything would have to move south. Faslane, Coulport and all 8000+ jobs would go. You won't need Faslane as a base in the fantasy Scot Navy, as you be able to tie up what you can afford at Broomielaw Quay.
You can pay a deposit of £5Bn upfront on independence day to cover the moving costs over a 10 year period - well you can add it to your debt that as a BBB+ economy, we'll charge you international lending rate +2points. You can top up the loan as the costs inevitably spiral. Think of it as your entry cost to NATO by committing to not cock up a key strategic capability as a side effect of the short sighted racist selfish nationalist wet dream. Of course we have no problem lending to such 'best pals' that just only discriminate against us a bit. We won't mention it (much).
Excellent indeed! That all OK with you?
You are being a bit unfair, you know how it works, the rest of the UK has to pay for everything, bend over and just take it, give them everything that they want and be happy about it.
Edinburger said:
While interesting, isn't most of this thread off topic?
What's the impact to UK politics of Scotland votes Yes? So for starters: a significantly reduced voice at EU, NATO, etc. (bearing in mind the UK has lost a third of her land mass and 10% of her population).
Thoughts?
What's the impact to UK politics of Scotland votes Yes? So for starters: a significantly reduced voice at EU, NATO, etc. (bearing in mind the UK has lost a third of her land mass and 10% of her population).
Thoughts?
I see it still matters to you that the UK suffers as a result. Just be reassured, it's OK, we'd be fine. Land mass is no great loss and less than 10% of population, do you really think we'd notice?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff