Clarkson: Racist

Author
Discussion

VeeDubBigBird

440 posts

130 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
[quote=JuniorD]

but more likely acquired a car and then someone thought that it would be amusing to bring to Argentina.

The previous owner confirmed it was purchased only a relatively short while before the shooting began. While possible what are the chances of them spending that much effort on one car and then never once mentioning it in any of the footage or tweets. If they wanted a reaction why try to hide it ?

JuniorD

8,628 posts

224 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
Chim said:
JuniorD said:
VeeDubBigBird said:
So basically what we have is a genuine coincidence or a biblical amount of effort for a joke that wasn't noticed for quite some time,
I doubt they sought out suitable car with a reg that would offend the Argies, but more likely acquired a car and then someone thought that it would be amusing to bring to Argentina. Anyway, i think Clarkson will keep going with the same flavoured st until he fks up really big time and we will be spared him for a few years.
Of course, thats it, they built an entire show around a number plate with a dubious link to the Falklands war rolleyes
You can build a show around a road trip to Argentina for plenty of reasons, it is famed for epic road trips after all, with the dodgy reg being a hook added on for amusement. They built a show around the southern states of the USA afterall, with the hook of adorning their cars with slogans that would raise the ire of the locals. It doesnt take a genius to read their form for these sort of antics.

StottyEvo

6,860 posts

164 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
So far all the hard evidence points to them being squeeky clean. Only circumstancial evidences paints them in a bad picture. Their entire story checks out too, there are no holes in it at all. Previous owner, impartial witness (mechanic), the previous private plates being under the originals...

A lot of conspiracy theories on PH have been debunked hehe

marshalla

15,902 posts

202 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
So far all the hard evidence points to them being squeeky clean. Only circumstancial evidences paints them in a bad picture. Their entire story checks out too, there are no holes in it at all. Previous owner, impartial witness (mechanic), the previous private plates being under the originals...

A lot of conspiracy theories on PH have been debunked hehe
And, most importantly as far as I'm concerned, a number plate is subtle. TG's other japes have been about as subtle as a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster.

carl_w

9,196 posts

259 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
mpire said:
It was FKL wasn't it ? not FLK ? neither of which, have sod all to do with Falkirk. Both FK and FL plates originate in Notts ( FO and FU were never issued for obvious reasons ) So, the "offending" plate was clearly chosen for effect.
At that time wasn't it the second two letters that told you the registration office? So in this case it would be KL and LK, or Maidstone and NW London.

KTF

9,809 posts

151 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all

Blib

44,206 posts

198 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
KTF said:
More details on their recent blog: http://transmission.blogs.topgear.com/2014/10/10/t...
Here it is in full. Seems pretty watertight to me.

Wilman said:
If you follow Top Gear in any way, shape or form, you won’t have missed the hoo-hah that’s kicked off following our recent filming in Patagonia. That’s probably the most boring opening sentence I’ve ever written for a blog, but this week isn’t the time for mirth and levity.

We’ve been accused by just about all of the press of setting out on that shoot knowing full well one of our cars was sporting a number plate that makes a nudge-nudge reference to the Falklands War: “H982 FKL” to be precise.

As a consequence, therefore, we got the stoning that we deserved when we were chased out of Ushuaia, a city where bitter feelings about the Falklands War run strong and deep.

As it happens, we didn’t put that number plate on deliberately – Jeremy has said so in print, James has said so on the radio, and Richard will be saying so on the radio again next week. Sadly I doubt their words will make one iota of difference to the newspapers, because our guilt is a lot more newsworthy than our innocence. In truth, though, the four of us and the rest of the team are much more concerned about what our audience believes.

I’ve read quite a few comments from viewers who are equally convinced we put the plate on deliberately, and I can understand that. We are, after all, a show known for getting into hot water through our antics, and now we’re protesting our innocence over this affair, we’re seen as merely crying wolf. I can also empathise with people who believe it’s exactly the sort of stunt we’d pull – cheeky number plate, wind up the locals, no harm done.

The truth is, however, this is most definitely not the sort of stunt we’d pull. For starters we would not base a joke around soldiers in conflict. Anybody who knows Top Gear knows how much work the presenters and the show does for Help For Heroes, and in our eyes soldiers are soldiers whatever the uniform.

Secondly, we set out on that trip to shoot a two-hour Christmas Special. It’s the most important film we make all year, and we would not plan such a crucial undertaking based on a number plate joke. Because, if you think about it for a moment, that’s precisely what we would have had to do.

We would have had to gather the whole team and say: “Sod what the cars are for this trip, just find one that’s registered with a number plate containing 982 and FKL.” The plate was a genuine plate, remember, not one we made up.

So our researchers would have got on the phone to the DVLA, asked them if such a car existed, and then when the DVLA came back and said, “There is, actually, on a Porsche 928,” we’d have then asked for the details of the owner.

At this point the DVLA would have refused, because that would be a contravention of the Data Protection Act (and they don’t pass on requests the other way to specific owners). So let’s say we persevere and obtain, probably illegally, the details of the owner of that car.

Then what? Then we would have to knock on his door and try and persuade him to sell us his car. And all this because we’re desperate to find a number plate with joke numbers and letters on it. It’s just nonsense beyond belief.

So let’s say we did know what cars we wanted for this shoot – V8 sports cars, as it happens. We would then be saying to the research team: “Make sure the Porsche has a number plate with that combination of numbers and letters.”

Right. Do you know how many Porsche 928GTs there were for sale when we were looking? Two or three, tops. The odds of one having the number plate we “wanted” are millions to one. The plate was genuine, remember, not one we had made up.

I explained all this to a chap from one of the national newspapers and he came back with a good question. “OK,” he said, “if it wasn’t deliberate, why didn’t you spot it and do something about it before you left the UK?”

Fair point, given we’re a car show. The fact is though, we didn’t. There were a core team of around four people in the office working on putting together the Special, and their priorities were getting the cars bought, mechanically checked for time-bombs and shipped to Argentina, with all the paperwork that endeavour requires.

On top of this they were booking crews and sorting hotels, fixers, camping, filming permits, crew travel, carnets, risk assessments, filming cars, props, mechanical back-up, the lot. Not only did they not have time to scrutinise number plates, but the eldest of the team was around six when the Falklands War broke out, so it’s not going to resonate even if they did see the plates.

As for me and the presenters, the older mob, we’re swamped with our own work too and likewise not looking at plates.

The truth is the first time we realised the plate could be a problem was on the third night of our shoot in Argentina (19 September, I believe), when Jeremy was scrolling through Twitter and spotted a comment on one of the auto fan sites, next to a photo of the plate. I remember his surprise and concern.

There are other witnesses to this fact. In fact, one of them – a mechanic we were using for the first time – has written to the Telegraph Letters page stating he saw Jeremy’s reaction and that it could have been nothing but genuine. (Weirdly, although he’s chased them, the Telegraph has so far not bothered to print his letter.)

Knowing this could be a problem, our office spoke to the local authorities in Ushuaia, the town where the war issue was most sensitive, and where we would end our trip in ten days’ time with a massive game of car football. We agreed with those authorities that the plates would be removed before we entered the town, and it was at this point – not before we left London – that we decided to get the BE11 END plates made for Jeremy’s car for the football match in the town.

Before we entered Ushuaia we duly removed the H982 FKL plates from the Porsche. For a day or two, the plate on the back said H1 VAE (the plate left there, underneath H982 FKL, from when one owner had privately registered the car). An advance party of our guys had been in there for a few days already, prepping the football game with no problem whatsoever. The local ski resort was looking forward to us filming there too.

There was nothing in the air to suggest trouble was brewing until the Argentinian veterans arrived and kicked off. We apologised that the existence of the plates earlier on would have caused offence. We explained they were now gone, and that they had not been a deliberate act. They didn’t believe us, told us to leave town or face the consequences, we did that very thing and drove into a night of violent terror.

That is how it all happened, and I would welcome the most rigorous investigation in the land to scrutinise our conduct in this affair. I probably won’t convince Damon Albarn, because he was happy to make his thoughts known before he heard our side of the story. But if I can get our point across to any one viewer, I’ll be content.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
In two minds about this. I know they do a lot for outside cars stuff for soldiers and that bit adds to them being innocent. However the regime in Argentina is not exactly having the UK on the xmas card list and the BBC, what better target to have a go at. At the very least then, guilty of mis reading the situation, perhaps any excuse would of been found if it were not number plates.

Still, I would not be surprised if they did it knowing the possible connections even if it were an accident. They do have form in this area.

lord trumpton

7,408 posts

127 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes to the above yes

It's just become so very predictable; especially these special editions where they have to travel across a country etc.

No matter what they say, it was not coincidence and they need to stop whinging and crack on.

rohrl

8,743 posts

146 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
As toxicnerve rightly says Top Gear have cried wolf too many times for us to take their word without question. One also rather gets the impression that Andy Wilman would try to spin TG's way out of Clarkson stamping a kitten to death. For me the "slope" incident was completely out of order and following that they should have steered well clear of any of this sort of controversy, which they clearly haven't.

pork911

7,187 posts

184 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
rohrl said:
As toxicnerve rightly says Top Gear have cried wolf too many times for us to take their word without question. One also rather gets the impression that Andy Wilman would try to spin TG's way out of Clarkson stamping a kitten to death. For me the "slope" incident was completely out of order and following that they should have steered well clear of any of this sort of controversy, which they clearly haven't.
It wasn't out of order it was an entirely innocent oversight. They fully accept they were deliberately referring to the guy as a slope (despite fanbois insistence they were only referring to the bridge) but nobody at TG or BBC standards (only a local operation after all) knew or thought to check that it was anything other than a perfectly acceptable term to use. Presumably the 'stars' and crew had been calling people it to their faces throughout the trip.

BillPeart

139 posts

117 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Jesus, you must really have a bug up your ass against Clarkson or are addicted to conspiracy hogwash. If you think after reading his account that he's deliberately lying in print and it all was a set up you and the other whiners must be mad.

burwoodman

18,709 posts

247 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
There is no proof they did knowingly did anything wrong and frankly who really gives a st about some upset Argies.

burwoodman

18,709 posts

247 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Moose, so you're saying hammond, May and Wilman are all liars. I can't believe anyone cares

creampuff

6,511 posts

144 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
You can build a show around a road trip to Argentina for plenty of reasons, it is famed for epic road trips after all, with the dodgy reg being a hook added on for amusement. They built a show around the southern states of the USA afterall, with the hook of adorning their cars with slogans that would raise the ire of the locals. It doesnt take a genius to read their form for these sort of antics.
Top Gear have a long, long history of boorish "jokes". I find it very very difficult to believe that they just happened to end up with a car with that number plate in Argentina.

PorkInsider

5,889 posts

142 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
Hammond is due on Radio 2 sometime after 8am today to talk about this, if anyone is interested.

creampuff

6,511 posts

144 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
[redacted]

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
previous form suggests it was if not deliberate then at least known-about

either: plan trip to argentina, spot 928 with vaguely falklands related plate - bonus!
or: plan v8 sportscars trip, spot 928 with vaguely falklands related plate - how about we go to Argentina?

Fishtigua

9,786 posts

196 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
How about we go to Argentina?
Having lived in South America, nothing is easy. Just popping over to Argentina takes months of planning, visas, paperwork, insurance, valid carnets, you name it.

Nothing is that easy. As Hammond said, it's their biggest filming shoot of the year, you don't want to norrs that up for a silly joke.

JF87

686 posts

122 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
Extreme naivety if you really don't believe this was deliberate.

No way of knowing if the Argie-baiting plate was chicken or egg as regards the trip, but either way it's frankly impossible to imagine JC in particular driving right through Argentina without indulging himself in regular Falklands jibes. Indeed much easier to imagine him agreeing to go there purely in order to have a Falklands-based laugh at their expense. No surprise that he was behind the wheel of that Porsche.

The plate would never have been the basis of the entire show - just one of those chortling, faux 'oh st!' asides. You know the score: after a few days in Argentina, one of the trio (probably James May) belatedly identifies the "unfortunate significance" of the reg plate, obliging a "worried" JC (to aren't-we-awful sniggers all round) to switch the plate for the Porsche's previous H1 VAE personalised plate, which happily is still in the boot. The next night, JC says he's also been alerted to some obscure potential source of offence in Hammond's plate, and says he's taken the opportunity to change that too - camera pans round and, tee-hee, there's the BE11 END plate that was found in the back of one of the other cars after TG fled and dumped them... Anyway, that scenario or something like it.

Just to emphasise that I really don't care about the offence caused - just find it a bit pathetic that JC and TG in general aren't man enough to fess up. Can only assume that after the slope/ episodes they genuinely feared they might not have been given another last chance...