What's Italian for 'kipper? Anti-migrant stunt goes awry.

What's Italian for 'kipper? Anti-migrant stunt goes awry.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Countdown

39,974 posts

197 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Well as far as we know he is not covering up for Kiddy Fiddlers, so he is head and shoulders above the Lib dems no (speaking as a former Liberal)?
Are you sure?

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/news/article/2964/uk...

Disclaimer: I don't think NF or UKIP have been covering up for kiddie fiddlers but if the game is "tarring everybody with the same brush" then I guess it's fair play.

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Getragdogleg said:
FFS, this is one of those BV/10ps mutual buddy love threads. Sorry, I didn't realise.

Moving on.
hehe
Time they got a room smile
Like the room you guys have in your "We love Nigel and cats" thread? hehe

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
UKIP can guarantee nothing as the party has no chance of forming a Government or holding the balance of power in a hung Parliament.

Cameron has made his promise. He is a politician, and he might break it, but I think he means to keep it. I am not a fan of Cameron, and I may be wrong about his plans, but I think if you really want the referendum you should vote Tory. I am concerned about the EU (democratic deficit, financial waste, CAP, mission creep) but it is not sufficiently high up on my list of concerns about stuff to make me vote Tory.
Don't be such a dunderhead. I wasted a vote on the Tories last election, I won't do it again.

I don't believe for one second the Tories would even be considering a referendum unless they knew the pressure is on. There's a danger they won't get the result they want... hehe

FredClogs

14,041 posts

162 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Countdown said:
Guam said:
Well as far as we know he is not covering up for Kiddy Fiddlers, so he is head and shoulders above the Lib dems no (speaking as a former Liberal)?
Are you sure?

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/news/article/2964/uk...

Disclaimer: I don't think NF or UKIP have been covering up for kiddie fiddlers but if the game is "tarring everybody with the same brush" then I guess it's fair play.
I will check that Later, is it on an industrial scale as it was with the Liberals (does make you wonder what was really behind what was done To Jeremy Thorpe now)
Sounds like the Queen Mum is implicated too...


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
...the Lords (unelected appointed commissionaires that they are)...
But they are now appointed by democratically elected representatives. Isn't that the standard defence to the observation that Barosso, Rumpoy, Ashton and the rest of the cabal are unelected?

FredClogs

14,041 posts

162 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
FredClogs said:
...the Lords (unelected appointed commissionaires that they are)...
But they are now appointed by democratically elected representatives. Isn't that the standard defence to the observation that Barosso, Rumpoy, Ashton and the rest of the cabal are unelected?
Somewhat, but there ain't no hereditary or religiously crow barred seats on the EU commision, there's plenty in the Lords, who as irony goes blocked the elected parliaments desire to pass in law an EU in/out referendum.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
fblm said:
FredClogs said:
...the Lords (unelected appointed commissionaires that they are)...
But they are now appointed by democratically elected representatives. Isn't that the standard defence to the observation that Barosso, Rumpoy, Ashton and the rest of the cabal are unelected?
Somewhat, but there ain't no hereditary or religiously crow barred seats on the EU commision, there's plenty in the Lords, who as irony goes blocked the elected parliaments desire to pass in law an EU in/out referendum.
If I'm honest responding to your post made me realise I'm broadly a supporter of the Lords whilst despising the EU commission with a passion, which I need to think about. I suspect those of a leftist persuasion are equally conflicted t'other way round.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Wow a rare moment of agreement, time to abolish the lords and have an elected upper house it is then thumbup
How will it differ from the crowd of vote buying morons in the Commons? 20 Year terms?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
If I'm honest responding to your post made me realise I'm broadly a supporter of the Lords whilst despising the EU commission with a passion, which I need to think about. I suspect those of a leftist persuasion are equally conflicted t'other way round.
Not I. I think that the Commission and the Lords are both rubbish, at least in concept, although from time to time in practice each of them can still do some good stuff (the Lords do this more often than the Commission, probably). In general, I would say elections good, appointments bad. I don't suggest elections for every public office, as then you just get unstable rule by populism, as happens in some aspects of US Government, but for bodies that have legislative power I'd rather that we vote the members in and out.

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
rule by populism
Heaven forfend!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Not I. I think that the Commission and the Lords are both rubbish, at least in concept, although from time to time in practice each of them can still do some good stuff (the Lords do this more often than the Commission, probably). In general, I would say elections good, appointments bad. I don't suggest elections for every public office, as then you just get unstable rule by populism, as happens in some aspects of US Government, but for bodies that have legislative power I'd rather that we vote the members in and out.
I tend to agree. I like the idea of a body, not driven by the need to be re-elected, with the ability to throw a spanner in the works of st legislation but I massively object to a bunch of Bishops and hereditary inbreds having any say what so ever, in anything. As for the Commission, I'll just say; Ashton, WTF?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
otolith said:
Breadvan72 said:
rule by populism
Heaven forfend!
Yes indeed we cant have the great unwashed determining their destiny, they will become deluded that they actually matter. smile
The point that I am making is that there is a distinction between democracy and mere majoritarianism. Rule by and for the people is not quite the same as populism. Democracy is not three foxes and one chicken deciding what to have for lunch (I have forgotten who said that and CBA to Google it). On the subject of public officials, if we elected, for example, every Chief Constable, Judge, General, NHS Hospital CEO, Bank of England Governor, Rail Regulator, and so on, we might find that we lost out on expertise and willingness to make unpopular decisions in favour of those who can court popularity.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Doubtless BV will be along in a mo to accuse the Late Queen Mum of complicity due to guilt by association, bang goes his hope of becoming a Judge then smile
Yikes! I would rather vote UKIP than be a Judge!

PS: Always did think that Queen Mother looked a bit dodgy. No one could drink that much gin and not be an Illuminati Alien Lizardoid, surely?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Guam said:
Yes indeed we cant have the great unwashed determining their destiny, they will become deluded that they actually matter. smile
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
― Winston Churchill

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Yes, but Churchill also correctly described democracy as the worst system of Government except for all the others.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Yes, but Churchill also correctly described democracy as the worst system of Government except for all the others.
Keeping it on the EU subject, he also said "If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law".

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Yes, but Churchill also correctly described democracy as the worst system of Government except for all the others.
I like this one "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." That's very apt considering today's latest media fabrication don't you think?

I'd say Farage is the closest thing we've had to Churchill since Churchill.

FredClogs

14,041 posts

162 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
I'd say Farage is the closest thing we've had to Churchill since Churchill.
A little bit of sick just came up in my mouth...

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
WinstonWolf said:
I'd say Farage is the closest thing we've had to Churchill since Churchill.
A little bit of sick just came up in my mouth...
I actually laughed out loud.

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
The point that I am making is that there is a distinction between democracy and mere majoritarianism. Rule by and for the people is not quite the same as populism. Democracy is not three foxes and one chicken deciding what to have for lunch (I have forgotten who said that and CBA to Google it). On the subject of public officials, if we elected, for example, every Chief Constable, Judge, General, NHS Hospital CEO, Bank of England Governor, Rail Regulator, and so on, we might find that we lost out on expertise and willingness to make unpopular decisions in favour of those who can court popularity.
The trouble is, it's hard to tell the difference between that kind of democracy and a political elite ignoring the will of the people they are meant to represent because they think they know better. The argument is really a thinly decorated appeal to benign dictatorship.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED