ebola, anyone else mildly terrified?
Discussion
Has anybody else read a profile in last Saturday's Guardian about a Pakistani woman fundamentalist terrorist now imprisoned in USA.
Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
Edited by avinalarf on Wednesday 3rd September 13:26
avinalarf said:
Has anybody else read a profile in last Saturday's Gaurdian about a Pakistani woman fundamentalist terrorist now imprisoned in USA.
Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
Whilst that stuff makes for good reading, if you were in the business of weaponising a virus why not choose one that is transmitted in air? Ebola is currently the "poster boy" of the virus world but is inefficient particulalrly in its transmission mechanism, but also in the way it kills off its host. Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
The head of Medicins san Frontieres suggested yesterday the battle against Ebola is being lost and the world is facing a "bio-disaster"
http://www.msf.org/article/global-bio-disaster-res...
Just saying...
http://www.msf.org/article/global-bio-disaster-res...
Just saying...
Rocksteadyeddie said:
avinalarf said:
Has anybody else read a profile in last Saturday's Gaurdian about a Pakistani woman fundamentalist terrorist now imprisoned in USA.
Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
Whilst that stuff makes for good reading, if you were in the business of weaponising a virus why not choose one that is transmitted in air? Ebola is currently the "poster boy" of the virus world but is inefficient particulalrly in its transmission mechanism, but also in the way it kills off its host. Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
As the MSF appear to be saying, does appear to be getting quite a lot worse and I'd guess now there are confirmed cases and deaths in 4 countries it doesn't get much worse than this for the people near by.
Case counts updated in conjunction with the World Health Organization updates:
Total Cases, Updated: August 28, 2014:
Suspected and Confirmed Case Count: 3069
Suspected Case Deaths: 1552
Laboratory Confirmed Cases: 1752
Or to put it another way from the wiki entries:
Case counts updated in conjunction with the World Health Organization updates:
Total Cases, Updated: August 28, 2014:
Suspected and Confirmed Case Count: 3069
Suspected Case Deaths: 1552
Laboratory Confirmed Cases: 1752
Or to put it another way from the wiki entries:
avinalarf said:
Rocksteadyeddie said:
avinalarf said:
Has anybody else read a profile in last Saturday's Gaurdian about a Pakistani woman fundamentalist terrorist now imprisoned in USA.
Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
Whilst that stuff makes for good reading, if you were in the business of weaponising a virus why not choose one that is transmitted in air? Ebola is currently the "poster boy" of the virus world but is inefficient particulalrly in its transmission mechanism, but also in the way it kills off its host. Amongst the stuff they found in her possession were details of weaponising the Ebola virus.
I am not one for conspiracy theories but thought it was apposite little known fact.
nonuts said:
As the MSF appear to be saying, does appear to be getting quite a lot worse and I'd guess now there are confirmed cases and deaths in 4 countries it doesn't get much worse than this for the people near by.
Case counts updated in conjunction with the World Health Organization updates:
Total Cases, Updated: August 28, 2014:
Suspected and Confirmed Case Count: 3069
Suspected Case Deaths: 1552
Laboratory Confirmed Cases: 1752
Or to put it another way from the wiki entries:
Don't like the shape of those graphs much. Case counts updated in conjunction with the World Health Organization updates:
Total Cases, Updated: August 28, 2014:
Suspected and Confirmed Case Count: 3069
Suspected Case Deaths: 1552
Laboratory Confirmed Cases: 1752
Or to put it another way from the wiki entries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGIPba3fq6o
Published on 2 Sep 2014
A patient suffering from the deadly Ebola virus leaves quarantine in Monrovia and searches for food at a local market before being caught by doctors and forced back into an ambulance while scared and angry crowds watch. Rough Cut (no reporter narration)
Published on 2 Sep 2014
A patient suffering from the deadly Ebola virus leaves quarantine in Monrovia and searches for food at a local market before being caught by doctors and forced back into an ambulance while scared and angry crowds watch. Rough Cut (no reporter narration)
Rocksteadyeddie said:
Whilst that stuff makes for good reading, if you were in the business of weaponising a virus why not choose one that is transmitted in air? Ebola is currently the "poster boy" of the virus world but is inefficient particulalrly in its transmission mechanism, but also in the way it kills off its host.
An outbreak where the disease is endemic doesn't raise any alarm bells with me.Not being easily transmitted is an advantage for a weaponised virus if you only want to kill the people you expose. Not so good as a WMD against civilian targets or a terrorist's weapon, but there are other viruses for that.
The British Ebola surviver is returning to Sierra Leone to once again work with Ebola victims.
He says that the evidence suggests that it's very likely he's now immune to Ebola - at least in the short term.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-29169014
He is taking a massive risk imo.
He says that the evidence suggests that it's very likely he's now immune to Ebola - at least in the short term.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-29169014
He is taking a massive risk imo.
BlackLabel said:
The British Ebola surviver is returning to Sierra Leone to once again work with Ebola victims.
He says that the evidence suggests that it's very likely he's now immune to Ebola - at least in the short term.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-29169014
He is taking a massive risk imo.
It should be made quite clear that he's on his own if it goes tits up again.He says that the evidence suggests that it's very likely he's now immune to Ebola - at least in the short term.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-29169014
He is taking a massive risk imo.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff