Discussion
Grumfutock said:
Doesn't need saying. An act of terrorism, by the very nature of it being an act of terrorism, is automatically condemned by any sane person. Does it need stating every time? No. But if you wish to go down that route also I note that the many, many, many examples of terrorism committed by Hamas that I have highlighted have not been condemned by yourself, nor for that matter the examples in my last post.
You seem to forget that I unreservedly condemned all acts of terrorism some time back. I've no need to do so again for every act, and I'm not going to respond to your faux outrage.What say you to the acts of terrorism committed by Mosad outside of Israel?
TheRealFingers99 said:
OK, but Gib is a British Overseas Territory.
Take Putin's attentat on Litvinenko: wasn't this an act of terrorism?
No it was an assassination, a murder.Grumfutock said:
Really? You absolutely sure about that?
Not absolutely. But my name isn't Bondski, Shlomo Bondski. Take Putin's attentat on Litvinenko: wasn't this an act of terrorism?
From the Oxford dictionary: "The unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims".
TheRealFingers99 said:
Hmmm.
The only ones I know anything about are the Iranian Embassy (arguable either way about whose soil it was on, but clearly directly provoked) and Gib.
Either are arguable either way.
Well the others were all Ops in NI were we ambushed various PIRA ASU's and killed them under an alleged shoot to kill policy.The only ones I know anything about are the Iranian Embassy (arguable either way about whose soil it was on, but clearly directly provoked) and Gib.
Either are arguable either way.
Well that went well:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-306397...
And this will bite them in the arse when they have people accused of war crimes, although I guess neither side will ever give them up so what is the point.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-306397...
And this will bite them in the arse when they have people accused of war crimes, although I guess neither side will ever give them up so what is the point.
Edited by Grumfutock on Wednesday 31st December 19:29
SR7492 said:
Wont matter as Israel has never signed up to the ICC. If the Palestinians get in the only people you will likely see getting extradited for crimes will be Hamas! ICC has no power over no members.Pointless and pathetic attempt to up the tension just like the attempts at the UN. Sadly the Palestinian Authority seem to have forgotten that the are in a unity government with a terrorist group and are therefore equally answerable for their actions.
SR7492 said:
What a strange reason for the Israelis to get upset about. Are they claiming this infringes their inalienable right to exist?Countdown said:
SR7492 said:
What a strange reason for the Israelis to get upset about. Are they claiming this infringes their inalienable right to exist?Grumfutock said:
Countdown said:
SR7492 said:
What a strange reason for the Israelis to get upset about. Are they claiming this infringes their inalienable right to exist?If you think this is a trick what is it meant to achieve?
Countdown said:
I've no idea (hence the question). I'm guessing the US are upset because the Israelis said "jump"
If you think this is a trick what is it meant to achieve?
To keep them in the press. They are fighting for world sympathy with the Kurds, Syrian refugees and others in the region. Anything they can do to make news is good from their point of view.If you think this is a trick what is it meant to achieve?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff