Tulisa Contostavlos drugs case

Author
Discussion

Grumfutock

Original Poster:

5,274 posts

165 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Mr Trophy said:
Grumfutock said:
Yes but he lied to the court in typical style. This idiots thinks he is above the law and i would hope the CPS now purse him for wasting the courts and police time and the judge has him for contempt.
Sorry - I am really not trying to cause a fight, surely if it's filmed, lied or not about something, there is still grounds there? What did he lie about?
No idea but if the judge saw fit to stop the case because of it then it is serious. It would also mean that unless there is fresh evidence then all of that used is now null and void?

Grumfutock

Original Poster:

5,274 posts

165 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
And it's often a good deal lower than 37%!
On the upside the rat dropping content is usually way over 50%.

s3fella

10,524 posts

187 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
And our beef jerky is now 50% rectum free

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
What a pleasing outcome. I'm no fan of the X-Factor bint, but this was clearly a fit-up in grand style by this fake sheikh. I'd like to see him charged with... something.

Grumfutock

Original Poster:

5,274 posts

165 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
What a pleasing outcome. I'm no fan of the X-Factor bint, but this was clearly a fit-up in grand style by this fake sheikh. I'd like to see him charged with... something.
Is being a complete an offense? Bloody should be!

Soov535

35,829 posts

271 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Grumfutock said:
hornetrider said:
What a pleasing outcome. I'm no fan of the X-Factor bint, but this was clearly a fit-up in grand style by this fake sheikh. I'd like to see him charged with... something.
Is being a complete an offense? Bloody should be!
There's a very good chance he will be charged with perjury.

This means prison.


tenpenceshort

32,880 posts

217 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Soov535 said:
There's a very good chance he will be charged with perjury.

This means prison.
£25 says perverting rather than perjury (need some independent evidence for the latter, not just the word of the driver).

Soov535

35,829 posts

271 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
tenpenceshort said:
Soov535 said:
There's a very good chance he will be charged with perjury.

This means prison.
£25 says perverting rather than perjury (need some independent evidence for the latter, not just the word of the driver).
Could be a good shout, but given the fact that he gave untruthful evidence under oath I think perjury.

Either way, this hasn't gone well for him has it!?

tenpenceshort

32,880 posts

217 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Soov535 said:
Could be a good shout, but given the fact that he gave untruthful evidence under oath I think perjury.

Either way, this hasn't gone well for him has it!?
Nope. Going to go from Fake Sheikh to Big Bob's 'Milk Shake' in about 6 months, I reckon

Edited to add on perjury;

Perjury Act said:
13 Corroboration.

A person shall not be liable to be convicted of any offence against this Act, or of any offence declared by any other Act to be perjury or subornation of perjury, or to be punishable as perjury or subornation of perjury, solely upon the evidence of one witness as to the falsity of any statement alleged to be false.
Edited by tenpenceshort on Monday 21st July 15:31

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
So, what's the next steps for the sheikh then? Do the CPS have to put a case together or is that for the cops dealing with the case or what?

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
urghhhh skanky finger nails :shudder:



Grumfutock

Original Poster:

5,274 posts

165 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
urghhhh skanky finger nails :shudder:


Yea like you wouldn't!!! Now be honest!

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Not this st again, that's what got the last thread locked.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Grumfutock said:
Lost soul said:
urghhhh skanky finger nails :shudder:


Yea like you wouldn't!!! Now be honest!
She would need a good scrubbing before I did , if I did

I would imagine she is so far up her own arse it would be unbearable to be in the same room with her for very long so it would have to be very quick angry bum sex

KFC

3,687 posts

130 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
I'm glad she got off with this, the full thing really stunk and I think it was horribly unfair to put her in the position where she thinks she's in line for a movie role then the bloke asks her where he can get some drugs.

It seems a bit bizarre that the actual dealer got off though, from his point of view there wasn't all the nasty smell of entrapment. He's definitely got very lucky here.

tenpenceshort

32,880 posts

217 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
KFC said:
It seems a bit bizarre that the actual dealer got off though, from his point of view there wasn't all the nasty smell of entrapment. He's definitely got very lucky here.
In a legal sense the entire trial was tainted. Based on the behaviour of the main witness, it would not be fair to try any of them. Even though the dealer had pleaded guilty, the result is that his prosecution is stayed.

ozzuk

1,180 posts

127 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
When I first saw this I thought, 'she's blown it again'. Shame, I enjoyed her last production.

gpo746

3,397 posts

130 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
tenpenceshort said:
gpo746 said:
I suspect someone in the CPS may have some questions to answer

Nothing you can really do about it. The tax payer will just be expected to take it on the chin
It looks to me as if the evidence of the reporter is the mainstay of the prosecution case. By the sound of it there were pre-trial hearings during which he gave evidence (this would be before the jury had been sworn in and probably an 'abuse of process' hearing trying to have the prosecution stayed). The result of the abuse hearings would have been that the judge believed there could be a fair trial, probably relying on the evidence already given by Mahmood.

If it turns out Mahmood had been telling porkies at the abuse hearing, and the decision to allow the trial relied on his evidence, it then stands to reason the decision to allow the trial could no longer stand (without other evidence to prevent a stay).

Sadly there's little the CPS can do to tell if Mahmood was lying at those hearings, when the court heard his evidence and found it sufficiently compelling. Sometimes people lie, sometimes they get found out- the main thing is that the trial process is sufficiently able to deal with such situations. Here it was.
Mahmood has been suspended by his employers pending an investigation.
Well that's a start. They tend to be so arrogant -News International - I'm surprised they didn't just turn the other cheek.

Magog

2,652 posts

189 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
According to wiki, there have been 94 convictions on the basis of Mazher Mahmood's investigations. If he were found guilty of perjury or perverting the course of justice, that's a hefty wedge of potentially unsafe convictions the courts might have to wade through.

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Magog said:
According to wiki, there have been 94 convictions on the basis of Mazher Mahmood's investigations. If he were found guilty of perjury or perverting the course of justice, that's a hefty wedge of potentially unsafe convictions the courts might have to wade through.
94 people stitched up like a kipper