Terminal cancer, and a huge car crash.

Terminal cancer, and a huge car crash.

Author
Discussion

backwoodsman

Original Poster:

2,467 posts

129 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
A 14 year old, with terminal cancer, was granted a dream ride in a Porsche.

The Porsche then crashes, causing him to bite his tongue off, and suffer severe injuries to his legs.

He passed away 2 months later

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2709536/Te...

Jasandjules

69,895 posts

229 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Pretty tragic all round.

Oakey

27,567 posts

216 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
I'm sure the compensation from the death of their already dying son will ease their pain somewhat

harrisp

200 posts

147 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Oakey said:
I'm sure the compensation from the death of their already dying son will ease their pain somewhat
Because money solves everything, obviously.

Hilts

4,391 posts

282 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Oakey said:
I'm sure the compensation from the death of their already dying son will ease their pain somewhat
It might buy him a better coffin/funeral.

/pragmatism

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
What a tragic chain of events.

I appreciate this is the Mail so the facts may not be 100% correct but the article suggests that:

1 - The charity approached the boy's family offering him this opportunity.
2 - The charity did not have insurance (or at least not proper insurance) - WTF!!!!
3 - Their attitude post accident has been terrible.

Re the compensation - yes this boy was terminally ill with only months to live however this accident must have made those final few months innumerably worse for the little boy and his family! I can't stand 'compensation culture' but in this case they deserve every penny they get - which they'll hopefully donate to a children's cancer charity.

Silent1

19,761 posts

235 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
harrisp said:
Oakey said:
I'm sure the compensation from the death of their already dying son will ease their pain somewhat
Because money solves everything, obviously.
Seems to be for them seeing as they've said they're suing for compensation.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
There was a young lad up in Yorkshire who had a similar last wish granted recently, many PHers made that possible, all with the best intentions and I understand it brought him great joy.
But to suffer such a cruel twist of fate as a result of goodwill and best intentions is so tragic.

Martin4x4

6,506 posts

132 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
A different perspective from the Guardian

'The Guardian' said:
Karin Benedik, head of the charity, said: "We are speechless. We helped this family, and now our name is being dragged through the mud. We don't want to say any more because we need to see what the accusations are, but as far as we're concerned we were not the organisers and are not responsible." She added that the organisers were Porsche Forum but refused to pass on a contact at the association and the website of the group provides no contact details. Porsche declined to comment on the case.
The laywer Dr Astrid Wagner likes to court controversial cases

Mr_B

10,480 posts

243 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Tragic, but can't help think it just pushes everyone down the road of not wanting to do anything or take a risk in case you a lawyer chasing you for money.

longshot

3,286 posts

198 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
2 - The charity did not have insurance (or at least not proper insurance) - WTF!!!!
3 - Their attitude post accident has been terrible.
Where does it say either of these things?

s p a c e m a n

10,777 posts

148 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
How the fk do these journalists get jobs? I only scrolled quickly through the article on my phone and picked out a couple of spelling mistakes, then at one point they say that he died in the car.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
longshot said:
BlackLabel said:
2 - The charity did not have insurance (or at least not proper insurance) - WTF!!!!
3 - Their attitude post accident has been terrible.
Where does it say either of these things?
The statement by the family lawyer suggests that there wasn't proper insurance. And that the charity won't tell the parents who actually organised the drive.

"Dr Wagner said: 'It was a charity event but these things should be properly organised and that means that the should be insurance as well as anything else. But the children's charity claim they didn't organise it, but won't tell us who did".


Edit - I made those observations purely from the DM piece in the OP. The Guardian article someone posted later obviously changes things a bit.


Edited by BlackLabel on Tuesday 29th July 21:09

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
I can't say I'm entirely comfortable with the idea that the family are now chasing a quick buck and going after a charity for it. They have suffered a tragic loss, so perhaps their judgement is impaired.

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

233 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
s p a c e m a n said:
How the fk do these journalists get jobs? ...
They just do; ABH on the English language and a basic inability to report events accurately on many/most occasions (the reality being to often just make some shcensoredt up and publish it!) is endemic to mainstream journalism these days frown .

Oh, and if there's some gossip to be squeezed in... This could be rumours among those at the scene, or from social media, for example - but this is where the shcensoredt that is 'published' comes from, I'd suggest wink .

No verification, just "publish and be damned!" nuts .

greygoose

8,261 posts

195 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
What a tragic chain of events.

I appreciate this is the Mail so the facts may not be 100% correct.
There isn't even a house price in the article.

zygalski

7,759 posts

145 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Were any royals involved?
How will the accident effect house prices in the area?
Are the parents on any benefits?
We need to know the answers to these questions!

Lordbenny

8,584 posts

219 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
A Boxster 986.... Hardly a dream ride...he could have got a go in an MX5 if he went on PH.

ILoveMondeo

9,614 posts

226 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
I can't say I'm entirely comfortable with the idea that the family are now chasing a quick buck and going after a charity for it. They have suffered a tragic loss, so perhaps their judgement is impaired.
Indeed, It's all very tragic, suing a charity seems a bit off though.

However how much of this is true, or daily wail tripe is anyone's guess.

Poor lad.

Bluequay

2,001 posts

218 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
harrisp said:
Oakey said:
I'm sure the compensation from the death of their already dying son will ease their pain somewhat
Because money solves everything, obviously.
People don't always sue for money, sometimes it takes putting people under oath in front of a jury to get to the truth of what happened. If that was my kid and the charity that was organising the event wouldn't satisfactorily answer my questions I would do the same thing.