US journalist beheaded by ISIS...

US journalist beheaded by ISIS...

Author
Discussion

Tony Starks

2,107 posts

213 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
How would the world act/responded if Assad started using chemical weapons again?

I know everyone was up in arms the first time round, but now it would be against a common enemy would everyone not mind so much and just send him a strongly worded email?

GT03ROB

13,268 posts

222 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
There were already on death row.

PRTVR

7,119 posts

222 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
Moral high ground ? We are not dealing with a conventional war here, Isis are not following the Geneva convention you know, the only thing they understand is force and violence, perhaps you would like to go out there and tell them they are naughty boys and need to stop it.

irocfan

40,539 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
sjn2004 said:
..and just think, Camermoron wanted to send arms to these idiots.
Yes, Cameron doesn't seem to mention the time when he was in favour of sending weaponry to these idiots, but he sure complains about them now...
and Millipede wanted us to invade Syria on their behalf...

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
She wanted to murder as many as possible . Did you see the carnage her husband did?

Tell his victims about high ground . There is no high or low ground with these people. There is no negotiating, no winning them around with hearts and minds.

We can't apply western values to these people. Jordan did what was necessary. Anything else is always seen as weakness and proof alah is in their side.

At least Jordan has done balls. Another 4 to go.


zygalski

7,759 posts

146 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
PRTVR said:
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
Moral high ground ? We are not dealing with a conventional war here, Isis are not following the Geneva convention you know, the only thing they understand is force and violence, perhaps you would like to go out there and tell them they are naughty boys and need to stop it.
I'm with you bud. smile
Adopt our own version of Sharia Law, public execution of suspected terrorists without trial & whilst we're at it, change the country's name to Englandistan.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
I suspect this was exactly what ISIS wanted to happen.

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

205 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Educate them out of the stoneage or vapourise then lot of them

Don't care which

As the current half arsed fking about being repeated again and again and again ain't fking working

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Quite possibly. They can spin the event whichever way they want.

Rarely are good decisions made in anger.

In a general sense, it's also easy to want to compromise the values and behaviours that set is apart from the barbaric acts.

scorp

8,783 posts

230 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'm beginning to wonder that, they had no intention of releasing the hostages so it follows they didn't care about getting their prisoners back either. Maybe this is a PR thing ?

Derek Smith

45,697 posts

249 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
uite possibly. They can spin the event whichever way they want.

Rarely are good decisions made in anger.

In a general sense, it's also easy to want to compromise the values and behaviours that set is apart from the barbaric acts.
The motive certainly wasn't to calm things and search for a resolution.

PRTVR

7,119 posts

222 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
zygalski said:
PRTVR said:
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
Moral high ground ? We are not dealing with a conventional war here, Isis are not following the Geneva convention you know, the only thing they understand is force and violence, perhaps you would like to go out there and tell them they are naughty boys and need to stop it.
I'm with you bud. smile
Adopt our own version of Sharia Law, public execution of suspected terrorists without trial & whilst we're at it, change the country's name to Englandistan.
It does read like that, but what I was meaning was that we should not force our Moral standards on others in cases like this, these people had been through a trial and were on death row.

Blaster72

10,879 posts

198 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The Jordanian was rumoured to have been killed as long ago as Jan 3rd, their choice of prisoner to swap was a joke. No way they'd swap a downed fighter pilot for 1 female failed suicide bomber.

The whole thing has been orchestrated to keep things in the news and to drag Jordan into the fight.

I was reading yesterday that most of ISIS top command have been recruited from high ranking ex members of the old Iraqi army hence the sudden surge in ground taken using good military strategy. This is slowly failing ad these known leaders are targeted and eliminated.

Makes you wonder what they are really up to?

don4l

10,058 posts

177 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
La Liga said:
uite possibly. They can spin the event whichever way they want.

Rarely are good decisions made in anger.

In a general sense, it's also easy to want to compromise the values and behaviours that set is apart from the barbaric acts.
The motive certainly wasn't to calm things and search for a resolution.
What would you suggest that we do to calm things down?

Digga

40,349 posts

284 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Tony Starks said:
How would the world act/responded if Assad started using chemical weapons again?
I miss-read that - I had visions of the British underclasses being extinguished in supermarket isles.

Anyway, back to the plot. Win-win for Uncle Sam right now. Just when brash Russian wealth was threatening to eclipse the American Dream (TM), and their political influence was beginning to make things awkward for US foreign policy, along comes;
  1. Oil price crash
  2. Call to arms for Team America World Police
As for the executions in Jordan, I don't really see they will give much support or advantage to ISIS. As others have said, we're not fighting a conventional war and, furthermore, once dead these terrorist prisoners cease to exist as potential bargaining chips.

I'm not certain the west should follow suit, but at the same time, I do feel that fighting guerilla whilst shackled to outmoded 'conventions' has failed with increasing regularity and severity throughout the latter part of the 20th century and the early part of the current century.

Cobnapint

8,634 posts

152 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
2013BRM said:
I am utterly gobsmacked that this has been forgotten.
Let's be fair, the situation has changed since that vote. Originally, Assad was cracking down on the civil uprising which was Syria's Arab spring. Assad wasn't too popular in the west so we tended towards support for the uprising ie freedom and democracy.

But the support in Syria for the FSA gradually woke up a list as long as your arm of Islamic nut jobs, Al Q, the Mujahedeen, bla bla bla, and now ISIS.

Easy to say we should have seen that coming, and the result of the vote was right in the end, but hindsight is a wonderful thing.

RYH64E

7,960 posts

245 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
HoHoHo said:
Now the coalition needs to respond from the air.

I think there needs to be 'shock and awe' which will unfortunately involve innocent civilians but I see no other way to try and manage this ongoing crisis.
I suppose that's OK providing it's only foreign innocent civilians that get killed or maimed and not European or American innocent civilians...

Lost soul

8,712 posts

183 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
We should (if we are not already) arm the Kurds to the teeth and bugger what the Turks feel about it

Cobnapint

8,634 posts

152 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I'm not so sure Jordan can hold the moral high-ground when executing people in retaliation.
What do you suggest then. Just annoy them a bit 'Big Brother House' style by not letting them have hot water in the shower for 12 hours..?

Wake up. The gloves are OFF matey.

Jordan has shown some mettle. Other nations are going to have to do the same before this cancer spreads too far.

babatunde

736 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
We should (if we are not already) arm the Kurds to the teeth and bugger what the Turks feel about it
Haven't we tried that already, "Afghanistan" (total success) You know the Kurds want their own country right, and aren't going to give back the weapons afterwards and won't only shoot at the people we want them to...