Hacked Celebrity Photos
Discussion
Jesus, spent the last couple of days looking round dodgy websites for leaked photos taken on someone's camera phone, cannot find them anywhere.
I mean it gets unveiled tomorrow, you'd have thought someone would post up some shots of the new MX-5?
I mean it gets unveiled tomorrow, you'd have thought someone would post up some shots of the new MX-5?
Edited by The Hypno-Toad on Wednesday 3rd September 11:35
The Hypno-Toad said:
Jesus, spent the last couple of days looking round dodgy websites for leaked photos taken on someone's camera phone, cannot find them anywhere.
I mean it gets unveiled tomorrow, you'd have thought someone would post up some shots of the new MX-5?
Thats actually really exciting news I mean it gets unveiled tomorrow, you'd have thought someone would post up some shots of the new MX-5?
Edited by The Hypno-Toad on Wednesday 3rd September 11:35
I feel sorry for the ladies involved, it's ok saying that these sort of images are readily available on the internet, however, they are of people who want to be seen in that light.
Jennifer Lawrence is well respected in her field, being made to look like a $50 porn star will do her no good.
The same goes for Kate Upton. She's made millions for wearing very little, now everyone (who wants too) knows what's hiding under the clothes. Kind of takes the fun away from it.
(That said-there's talk of Michelle Keegan being involved. Woohoo!!)
Jennifer Lawrence is well respected in her field, being made to look like a $50 porn star will do her no good.
The same goes for Kate Upton. She's made millions for wearing very little, now everyone (who wants too) knows what's hiding under the clothes. Kind of takes the fun away from it.
(That said-there's talk of Michelle Keegan being involved. Woohoo!!)
Thankyou4calling said:
Won't make a jot of difference.
For a couple on that list I suspect that it will make a little difference, as in the lack of the extra pay cheque for getting their boobs out in a future movie. Is said before it is alleged that Ms Berry received a considerable sum (I said $1m, Wiki says $0.5m) for removing her bikini top in Swordfish in 2001, although she says that this was not the reason she did it.Andyjc86 said:
The same goes for Kate Upton. She's made millions for wearing very little, now everyone (who wants too) knows what's hiding under the clothes. Kind of takes the fun away from it.
Some of this set are at a different level to all the others leaked.Quite why you would want a close up taken by someone just after they have completed invading your privacy is a little strange
Funkycoldribena said:
chris watton said:
Funkycoldribena said:
Erm...wasnt it page 7 fella?
IIRC (and I am talking 30 years ago so memory may be a little hazy, fella..) wasn't page 3 the Sun and page 7 the Star?
Willhire89 said:
Some of this set are at a different level to all the others leaked.
Quite why you would want a close up taken by someone just after they have completed invading your privacy is a little strange
I've heard it called a lot of different things in my time but this is the first time I have heard it called a 'privacy' before! Quite why you would want a close up taken by someone just after they have completed invading your privacy is a little strange
I would also add that I am lead to believe that there are other photos of others that, personally, I would be a lot more red faced over than a post sex, pre wipedown picture. In this thread there is mention of photos involving winkies next to eyes and a novel new location to store your hair straighteners...
Rude-boy said:
I've heard it called a lot of different things in my time but this is the first time I have heard it called a 'privacy' before!
I would also add that I am lead to believe that there are other photos of others that, personally, I would be a lot more red faced over than a post sex, pre wipedown picture. In this thread there is mention of photos involving winkies next to eyes and a novel new location to store your hair straighteners...
It was a curling tong according to my wife.I would also add that I am lead to believe that there are other photos of others that, personally, I would be a lot more red faced over than a post sex, pre wipedown picture. In this thread there is mention of photos involving winkies next to eyes and a novel new location to store your hair straighteners...
Upton's other half is a MLB pitcher so gets paid a fair whack. It seems to be his phone the shots came from, nothing to cry about as he is getting his mitts on Kate Upton, nightly. He might have to do a bit of explaining as to the various naked pics of other women. Oh and the ones of him banging said various women..
Rude-boy said:
Willhire89 said:
Some of this set are at a different level to all the others leaked.
Quite why you would want a close up taken by someone just after they have completed invading your privacy is a little strange
I've heard it called a lot of different things in my time but this is the first time I have heard it called a 'privacy' before! Quite why you would want a close up taken by someone just after they have completed invading your privacy is a little strange
I would also add that I am lead to believe that there are other photos of others that, personally, I would be a lot more red faced over than a post sex, pre wipedown picture. In this thread there is mention of photos involving winkies next to eyes and a novel new location to store your hair straighteners...
'Babyliss - up there with the best!'
daddy cool said:
So, the pictures aren't of her, but if they were, they would be under-18 pictures. But they're not of her. Riiiight.
On a related note, theres a Cat Deeley one out now. So im told.
Cat Deeley photo isn't great.On a related note, theres a Cat Deeley one out now. So im told.
Fappening has made its own website, a .org using its own name....
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff