Ed Miliband

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
jonby said:
If you don't pay tax because you are breaking the law (i.e. avoidance), it's not the rules that need changing, it's enforcement of the law

If you are taking advantage of a loophole that is deemed unfair, i.e certain forms of tax evasion, then the loophole can be changed through law
Learn the difference between avoidance & evasion before talking about them. Please.
Or you could have said

"Good post, but you seems to have transposed avoidance and evasion."

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 20th April 2015
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Why can't people understand that to have a sound welfare system, one must have a sound economy first. It simply doesn't work the other way around.
This was posted in the Election thread but but it goes much deeper than this. It's the case that those who do not want to help themselves, those who would prefer a life of state support, the type of people that Labour would prefer to 'look after' rather than giving opportunity to break free of their depressed economic situation, just don't care about the big picture. If you don't care about something, you never try to understand.

It's a very sad reflection on the thinking of too many people.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
audidoody said:
"Look, I'd just like to say this to the people at home watching this ...."

"It's only fair that ..."

"Broadest shoulders ..."

"The vulnerable members of society ..."

"The bankers ..."

Blah blah blah
Don't forget squiilionaires!!! Oh, and the NHS.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 21st April 2015
quotequote all
Snozzwangler said:
I work at a bank, hence I burn grandmas for a living.
As an aside, what do you find to be the best accelerant for old dears?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Sunday 26th April 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
The problem is that the rich will generally be able to outsmart Milipede,
Funny you should say that. My daughters (both at different fee payig London schools) mentioned this weekend that some of their mates have mentioned overheard serious parental discussions about exiting the UK if Labour gets in.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 2nd May 2015
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Not quite Doing A Kinnock but he could get there with a bit of effort.
hehe I was thinking the very same thing.

I believe that was the beginning of the end for Kinnock as Labour Ieader scratchchin

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 2nd May 2015
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
"Not waving but drowning"?
Technical term is a "flounder".

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 2nd May 2015
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Something else fishy about Ed.

That's the fella!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Sunday 3rd May 2015
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
When the AMA does what it can to restrict the number of doctors practising and limit what nurses can do there is no surprise that the cost of health care in America is high.

If the NHS is so good why am I not given the choice of not paying into it (or even claiming back some of the money)? A quality service does not make people pay for it and then pay again for another provider.
Can you explain what you mean? In the UK the private sector doesn't cover all the services offered by the NHS.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Sunday 3rd May 2015
quotequote all
It wouldn't be s disaster if he won. A summer of entertainment. Boris or St Theresa PM by Christmas...

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Sunday 3rd May 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Three letters.


S. N. P.
Selective quoting totally missed the point

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
"Ed Miliband has defended his decision to carve Labour promises in stone - insisting he wants to show the public his pledges will not expire on 8 May.

The limestone monument, which the Labour leader suggested could be placed in the garden of Number 10, has already attracted widespread comment.

The 8ft stone has already prompted its own hashtag #EdStone and has been mocked by David Cameron and Nick Clegg.

But Mr Miliband said he wanted to be the first politician to "over deliver"."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32580534
Good for ed, finally a politician with some conviction.

Ignoring the fact that he'll have to make a u turn on a deal with the SNP and that grubby business about doing over his own brother.



anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
Zod said:
Lucy Powell, who is in charge of Labour's election campaign has said the "promises" carved on the stone are not binding!

Lucy Powell said:
Labour "Election Chief" - f*ck me, if that the calibre of people who will potentially be in charge, I despair!


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
handpaper said:
Gargamel said:
No surprise Nigel isn't down with the kids.
It's been said a lot, but...
A friend of my son, 18 y.o. and voting for the first time, tells me that "most" of the people he knows at college are voting UKIP.
Now, self-selection bias, circle of friends, yada yada.
But he's not what I'd call a rabid right-winger (doesn't follow Rand Paul, read zerohedge etc.) and Newport West isn't exactly prime UKIP territory.
Go figure.
I suppose we'll see on Friday.
Depends if you view UKIP as rabid right wingers or not.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
edh said:
johnxjsc1985 said:
which part of his rant is no the truth though ?
I struggled to find anything truthful TBH
Really?

Then why not put the other side? For each point, give us your opinion?

What Littlejohn says IS basically true IMO. A bit hyped, yes, but generally unassailable.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
edh said:
johnxjsc1985 said:
which part of his rant is no the truth though ?
I struggled to find anything truthful TBH
You missed a bit, and another bit and more bits.

Struggling to find something truthful - that'll be EdStone.

Labour's campaign drone said she doesn’t "think anyone is suggesting that the fact that he’s carved them into stone means, you know, means that he will absolutely, you know, not going to break them or anything like that."

It turns out that Ed's Commandments are basically bks, but we knew that already.
Wasn't that amazing? One of his most devoted supporters, presumably, telling us that what Ed promises and reinforces by the ludicrous gimmick of carving them into a stone slab, he probably isn't going to keep....

And people still vote for them?


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
edh said:
edh said:
"facts" from Littlejohn...

"the prospect of this extra-terrestrial Marxoid geek as our next Prime Minister"
not extra terrestrial, what is "Marxoid?", Ok possibly "geek".

edh said:
"a party which beggared Britain by spending like a drunken sailor with a stolen platinum credit card"
didn't "beggar" Britain with spending, debt was falling as % of GDP until 2007. Then something happened - oh yes, Labour caused the US sub prime market to collapse and engineered the global financial crisis.rolleyes

edh said:
"They also brought you the Mid Staffs scandal, which caused the deaths of 1,200 patients."
It didn't cause 1200 (excess) deaths - wildly overhyped claims from papers

edh said:
"an undemocratic constitutional outrage"
It wouldn't be. The constitution permits is. Might be the spur to constitutional reform and voting reform.

edh said:
"Miliband would bankrupt Britain, borrowing more, taxing more, spending more and reversing the popular reforms to welfare benefits.
He'd take us back to the socialist, statist Seventies.
Wouldn't bankrupt Britain, how could it?. Welfare reforms not popular, no plans for "seventies style" state control of industry

edh said:
"...propped up by a gang of Stalinist separatists"
really? Ok separatists maybe. In practice they are often to the right of Labour

edh said:
"she can realise her dream of turning Scotland into a cross between basket-case Greece and East Germany before the fall of communism.
I'm sure she dreams of little else...
Is that it?

Thanks for explaining that the financial crisis ion Western Europe was actually an American problem. The way I experienced it, it was due to economic mismanagement by Labour over a period of years.

Also, debt as a % of GDP was steadily rising between 2002 and 2008, despite over 30% growth in GDP:

2001 37.3%
2002 37.1
2003 38.7
2003 40.3
2005 41.7
2006 42.7
2007 43.9
2008 51.9

I will concede that, technically, they maybe can't bankrupt the Country. To all intents and purposes, though, they did that last time so there's every reason to think, given what we've heard and seen recently, that they'd do it again.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 5th May 2015
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
I was surprised and not a little disappointed to see Delia Smith come out in support of this clown.

I wish these guilt-ridden millionaires would realise that they can offload their wealth at any time by writing a cheque to the treasury, who will spend it wisely. They don't need to wait for new taxes to make it legit.
Delia needs her millions to keep her football club going.

Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 5th May 18:17

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Wednesday 6th May 2015
quotequote all
Zod said:
A continuation of effective, responsible government, preferably without need of the LibDems. Obviously.
The truly irritating thing about this election is that (I think) if the current Coalition could stand as a single entity, they would walk to a big overall majority. The Coalition is, right now, greater than the sum of its parts, but the fact thathte two parts have to stand separately is benefiting Miliband enormously.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
KTF said:
All these people posting the pictures of him when he was young and making a witty comment should post one of themselves at a similar age so we can all have a good laugh at them wink
Eh? This is an ed thread. Why should people post photos of themselves in it?