Discussion
Boydie88 said:
On Radio 2 at work now. I consider myself a pretty chilled and laid back person but listening to him makes me want to recreate this...
Spends the whole time bad talking the Tories and doesn't say anything about Labour. Instead just empty. immeasurable s
t.
Has he answered a direct question with a direct, honest, factual response...?Spends the whole time bad talking the Tories and doesn't say anything about Labour. Instead just empty. immeasurable s
t.
Pan Pan Pan said:
longblackcoat said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Millipede keeps banging on about the NHS, and protecting the `vulnerable' but what his supporters seem unable (but in all probability unwilling) to grasp, is that without a sound / strong economy one cannot have a decent NHS, because like all worthwhile things in life it has to be paid for.
Labour supporters don't care about where the money comes from, only that it comes, which is why they see no problem in the labour government grabbing other peoples hard earned cash, and splashing it around. The problem for labour is what happens when they finally run out of everyone ELSE`s money, and they don't know where to look for their next cash grab.
Then they creep out, leaving notes behind saying the cash is all gone, leaving someone else to sort out the mess (and take the flak for doing so) and they will do this every time they get into number 10. They don't know how to do `government' any better. They just DONT`know.
You made almost exactly the same post yesterday, didn't you? Labour supporters don't care about where the money comes from, only that it comes, which is why they see no problem in the labour government grabbing other peoples hard earned cash, and splashing it around. The problem for labour is what happens when they finally run out of everyone ELSE`s money, and they don't know where to look for their next cash grab.
Then they creep out, leaving notes behind saying the cash is all gone, leaving someone else to sort out the mess (and take the flak for doing so) and they will do this every time they get into number 10. They don't know how to do `government' any better. They just DONT`know.
Try saying something new. Like who are you going to vote for, why they are the right answr, and why you feel people can trust them.
What is wrong with an observation based on known fact? Should I change what I say today just because it was true yesterday as well?
P5Nij said:
Has he answered a direct question with a direct, honest, factual response...?
Granted, he did say some stuff Labour want to do when I posted but fk me. He has to be the most uninspiring would be leader ever.I should be his target audience. Currently a low-middle earner working in an industry which is good for the country but he is just woeful.
Boydie88 said:
Granted, he did say some stuff Labour want to do when I posted but fk me. He has to be the most uninspiring would be leader ever.
I should be his target audience. Currently a low-middle earner working in an industry which is good for the country but he is just woeful.
are we missing something maybe?.k me. He has to be the most uninspiring would be leader ever.I should be his target audience. Currently a low-middle earner working in an industry which is good for the country but he is just woeful.
Does he wear his underpants over his trousers or more likely as well as being the b
h of the SNP he will also have to payu the Unions back for getting him the job in the first place.Woeful, yes indeed, but his brainwashed followers will still lap it up as though it were gospel, there's the rub.
Is this the Prime Minister we truly deserve? Jesus wept, I hope not. Some say personality shouldn't come into it but we need character, substance and real leadership, not this wet flannel.
Is this the Prime Minister we truly deserve? Jesus wept, I hope not. Some say personality shouldn't come into it but we need character, substance and real leadership, not this wet flannel.
P5Nij said:
Woeful, yes indeed, but his brainwashed followers will still lap it up as though it were gospel, there's the rub.
Is this the Prime Minister we truly deserve? Jesus wept, I hope not. Some say personality shouldn't come into it but we need character, substance and real leadership, not this wet flannel.
whats really boiling my piss is that munchkin norht of the border telling who "WILL" be PM and I thought the election sorted that out.Is this the Prime Minister we truly deserve? Jesus wept, I hope not. Some say personality shouldn't come into it but we need character, substance and real leadership, not this wet flannel.
He will have to take it both ends becuase the Unions are going to want their cut and Sturgeon definitely will want hers too.Spit roast anyone.
johnxjsc1985 said:
. . . the Unions are going to want their cut . . .
Unions have sinister hold over Miliband as Mail investigation reveals over half of Labour candidates in key seats are sponsored by Unite militants"The analysis by the Mail lays bare the extraordinary stranglehold the union's firebrand leader 'Red' Len McCluskey has on Ed Miliband."
johnxjsc1985 said:
Alex Salmond said:
turbobloke said:
Unions have sinister hold over Miliband as Mail investigation reveals over half of Labour candidates in key seats are sponsored by Unite militants
"The analysis by the Mail lays bare the extraordinary stranglehold the union's firebrand leader 'Red' Len McCluskey has on Ed Miliband."
when Sturgeon and the Unions have finished with him he is going to need a period in intensive care."The analysis by the Mail lays bare the extraordinary stranglehold the union's firebrand leader 'Red' Len McCluskey has on Ed Miliband."
Are people really going to sleepwalk into a Gov run by Unite and the SNP.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff