Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 6
Discussion
fluffnik said:
Yes voters of my acquaintance include:
<Graham Lister> I know doctors dentists and architects.... People of quality. </Graham Lister>- CFO of an oil related company
- Asset managers
- Several Doctors, medical and otherwise
- Assorted computer scientists, physicists, mathematicians, geophysicists, etc...
- The owner of an internet hosting company
- Numerous showbiz folks, mainly production and technical
- Restaurateurs
- ...
fluffnik said:
wsurfa said:
fluffnik said:
Bit gutted, moving on...
There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
Perhaps I'm confused, if 'yes' had won 50.1:49.9 then all the people who wanted to stay in the Union had to just shut and up put up with never being part of the (or one of the) most successful unions ever.There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
But if the 'no' win, then we have to listen to the whining of the other side to 'get another go'?
Sometimes losing a vote closes out options - I've never voted for privatisations for example - but it doesn't stop you working for your political aims.
My political aims include ending the UKofGB&NI.
fluffnik said:
Yes voters of my acquaintance include:
Well there's a relatively high correlation (0.76) across the 32 pairs of data (constituencies) with arrays of yes % and benefits claimants %. Feel free to tell us all what you think Pearson’s r would be in those circumstances?- CFO of an oil related company
- Asset managers
- Several Doctors, medical and otherwise
- Assorted computer scientists, physicists, mathematicians, geophysicists, etc...
- The owner of an internet hosting company
- Numerous showbiz folks, mainly production and technical
- Restaurateurs
- ...
fluffnik said:
wsurfa said:
fluffnik said:
Bit gutted, moving on...
There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
Perhaps I'm confused, if 'yes' had won 50.1:49.9 then all the people who wanted to stay in the Union had to just shut and up put up with never being part of the (or one of the) most successful unions ever.There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
But if the 'no' win, then we have to listen to the whining of the other side to 'get another go'?
Sometimes losing a vote closes out options - I've never voted for privatisations for example - but it doesn't stop you working for your political aims.
My political aims include ending the UKofGB&NI.
fluffnik said:
Losing a vote does not end your franchise.
Sometimes losing a vote closes out options - I've never voted for privatisations for example - but it doesn't stop you working for your political aims.
My political aims include ending the UKofGB&NI.
Sorry, but that is exactly what losing the vote the other way would have entailed.Sometimes losing a vote closes out options - I've never voted for privatisations for example - but it doesn't stop you working for your political aims.
My political aims include ending the UKofGB&NI.
So please explain why you think you should have it both ways?
fluffnik said:
Wombat3 said:
...and you all lost.
This time. Fluffnik's profile said:
Nickname: fluffnik
Name: Alistair J Murray
Member Since: 3rd May 2005
Total Posts: 19,588
Occupation: fluff
Region: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom
Notes:
Name: Alistair J Murray
Member Since: 3rd May 2005
Total Posts: 19,588
Occupation: fluff
Region: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom
Notes:
fluffnik said:
wsurfa said:
fluffnik said:
Bit gutted, moving on...
There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
Perhaps I'm confused, if 'yes' had won 50.1:49.9 then all the people who wanted to stay in the Union had to just shut and up put up with never being part of the (or one of the) most successful unions ever.There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
But if the 'no' win, then we have to listen to the whining of the other side to 'get another go'?
Sometimes losing a vote closes out options - I've never voted for privatisations for example - but it doesn't stop you working for your political aims.
My political aims include ending the UKofGB&NI.
You can be an "anti-citizen" if you want - or you could try something really novel (for you) and get on the same team that most everyone else is on and start pulling in the same direction as most of the other people.
You won't of course because you are who you are sitting squarely on the negative side of the country's balance sheet.
The reality is that you revel in that status & you clearly think of yourself as some kind of anti-establishment hero.
You really need to have a word with yourself.
Wombat3 said:
Yes, we know that, and after two years campaigning you and yours were unable to persuade enough people to go along with that particular notion,
You can be an "anti-citizen" if you want - or you could try something really novel (for you) and get on the same team that most everyone else is on and start pulling in the same direction as most of the other people.
You won't of course because you are who you are sitting squarely on the negative side of the country's balance sheet.
The reality is that you revel in that status & you clearly think of yourself as some kind of anti-establishment hero.
You really need to have a word with yourself.
Exactly, as the 'noise' from Salmond towards those like Darling and Brown was 'post independence will you work towards the common goal', why is this suddenly different just because you lost?You can be an "anti-citizen" if you want - or you could try something really novel (for you) and get on the same team that most everyone else is on and start pulling in the same direction as most of the other people.
You won't of course because you are who you are sitting squarely on the negative side of the country's balance sheet.
The reality is that you revel in that status & you clearly think of yourself as some kind of anti-establishment hero.
You really need to have a word with yourself.
fluffnik said:
whoami said:
fluffnik said:
Which is why getting rid of the UK was/is the simple and effective solution!
How do you feel?There's a facebook group called "We are the 45%" it already has over 89,000 members, we're not going back in the box!
rich1231 said:
fluffnik said:
Yes voters of my acquaintance include:
That is just awesome.- CFO of an oil related company
- Asset managers
- Several Doctors, medical and otherwise
- Assorted computer scientists, physicists, mathematicians, geophysicists, etc...
- The owner of an internet hosting company
- Numerous showbiz folks, mainly production and technical
- Restaurateurs
- ...
How many of them were there?
Oh yes I remember, not enough.
Wombat3 said:
fluffnik said:
Derek Smith said:
Who would have thought that some of those who lost the vote would not accept it.
Do you stop voting just because your guy lost last time? Get used to it
Your aims are the very definition of futility...
Bring back VP so we can rub his nose in it
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff