A superb Speech and Vow by Cameron well above expectations

[Timsta]

Zod said:

o, that is the preference of UKIP supporters.

David Davis lost the Conservative leadership election a long time ago. He is yesterday's man.

That's just plain stupid. Surely you should vote for the party that has the policies you want, not your favourite colour. That way the party that wins is the one that had the policies that most of the country support.

[sidicks]

iphonedyou said:

Has CaMoreOn confirmed he pays the full 45% allowance across the board yet?

And did he explain his thinking behind not being able to offset first year losses when starting a business, and what he supposed the result would be economically?

I've read a lot of his posts, but I couldn't finish - he's just so angry (and misinformed).

Do you really want to resurrect his nonsense?!

[Zod]

Timsta said:

Zod said:

o, that is the preference of UKIP supporters.

David Davis lost the Conservative leadership election a long time ago. He is yesterday's man.

That's just plain stupid. Surely you should vote for the party that has the policies you want, not your favourite colour. That way the party that wins is the one that had the policies that most of the country support.

I think you need to do a bit of homework on our electoral system.

[iphonedyou]

sidicks said:

Do you really want to resurrect his nonsense?!

No! That's why I'm appealing to you lot!

[Spanglepants]

You're quite right, thanks for posting that. What a humble man
Im not embarrassed to say my eyes weren't totally dry after that.

VinceFox said:

That's not a speech. Watch from 10:30 on...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jB2Pn1I_tI&sns...

Not political, not loud or brash, but perfectly measured and delivered.

[Spanglepants]

You're quite right, thanks for posting that. What a humble man
Im not embarrassed to say my eyes weren't totally dry after that.

VinceFox said:

That's not a speech. Watch from 10:30 on...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jB2Pn1I_tI&sns...

Not political, not loud or brash, but perfectly measured and delivered.

[powerstroke]

Zod said:

XJ Flyer said:

That would take the removal of Cameron and putting in someone like David Davis as Conservative leader.Unfortunately for the country Cameron and his Cons seem to prefer the idea of allowing the Labour Party in than stepping down and allowing that to happen.

No, that is the preference of UKIP supporters.

David Davis lost the Conservative leadership election a long time ago. He is yesterday's man.

Yes he is !!!we don't want a conservative leading the Tory party heaven forbid
They might have won an election .,.

[XJ Flyer]

Zod said:

XJ Flyer said:

That would take the removal of Cameron and putting in someone like David Davis as Conservative leader.Unfortunately for the country Cameron and his Cons seem to prefer the idea of allowing the Labour Party in than stepping down and allowing that to happen.

No, that is the preference of UKIP supporters.

David Davis lost the Conservative leadership election a long time ago. He is yesterday's man.

Losing the leadership race isn't the same thing as saying that the best man won.

As I said the Cons would prefer to see a Labour government than the Farage/Davis coalition that the country needs or which would at least be the best of the available bunch.

Edited by XJ Flyer on Wednesday 8th October 19:50

[Mermaid]

XJ Flyer said:

Losing the leadership race isn't the same thing as saying that the best man won.

As I said the Cons would prefer to see a Labour government than the Farage/Davis coalition that the country needs or which would at least be the best of the available bunch.

CMD's secret weapon, Boris, wants to control EU immigration with quotas.

[XJ Flyer]

Mermaid said:

XJ Flyer said:

Losing the leadership race isn't the same thing as saying that the best man won.

As I said the Cons would prefer to see a Labour government than the Farage/Davis coalition that the country needs or which would at least be the best of the available bunch.

CMD's secret weapon, Boris, wants to control EU immigration with quotas.

Cameron 'said' that the Cons would stop Prescott's plan to concrete over the south east with housing and infrastructure.We've now got HS2,Heathrow and/or Gatwick expansion and a 'presumption in favour of development' even in the case of Green Belt areas.

As for the EU free movement of immigrants is just one of the issues.Added to that is majority rule in most aspects of every day government legislation by foreign majority federal voting and of course our net contributions and trade deficit.

There's no way that the pro EU Cameron is going to say no to any of that and just like in the case of development will tell the electorate one thing and do the exact opposite.As for Boris Johnson he's too close to Cameron and I think Davis is the better choice assuming that the Conservatives want to help Farage swing the anti EU anti immigration Labour vote.

Edited by XJ Flyer on Monday 13th October 02:11