UKIP - The Future - Volume 3
Discussion
McWigglebum4th said:
Zod said:
It would put it to bed for at least five years. Meanwhile Miliband's government would do everything in its power to embed us more deeply into the EU.
Personally, I don't want to spend the next five years paying much higher taxes.
I can think of 1.7 billion reasons why you will be paying higher taxesPersonally, I don't want to spend the next five years paying much higher taxes.
Esseesse said:
Zod said:
It would put it to bed for at least five years. Meanwhile Miliband's government would do everything in its power to embed us more deeply into the EU.
Personally, I don't want to spend the next five years paying much higher taxes.
The Tory's/Coalition have done everything they can to embed us more deeply into the EU, no different.Personally, I don't want to spend the next five years paying much higher taxes.
Guam said:
BlackLabel said:
A recent Dods Polling survey:
"We asked a representative cross-section of 100 MPs about Ukip’s chances in 2015, and the response suggests talk of petrified Members running scared of the purple army is pretty wide of the mark. Just 5% of MPs think Ukip will pick up more than five seats, while more than two thirds believe Farage’s party will pick up just two or fewer.
Interestingly, this confidence appears to be even stronger among Tory MPs; only 3% of them think Ukip will pick up more than five seats at the election, and more than three quarters (76%) believe Ukip will pick up two seats or fewer. In fact, close to 40% believe the party will pick up no seats whatsoever.
The overwhelming majority of MPs appear to believe that far from being the start of a revolution which will spread across Kent and Essex and up the eastern coast, Ukip’s victory in Clacton will turn out to be an anomaly which can be contained locally after all. "
http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/107021/the_...
"We asked a representative cross-section of 100 MPs about Ukip’s chances in 2015, and the response suggests talk of petrified Members running scared of the purple army is pretty wide of the mark. Just 5% of MPs think Ukip will pick up more than five seats, while more than two thirds believe Farage’s party will pick up just two or fewer.
Interestingly, this confidence appears to be even stronger among Tory MPs; only 3% of them think Ukip will pick up more than five seats at the election, and more than three quarters (76%) believe Ukip will pick up two seats or fewer. In fact, close to 40% believe the party will pick up no seats whatsoever.
The overwhelming majority of MPs appear to believe that far from being the start of a revolution which will spread across Kent and Essex and up the eastern coast, Ukip’s victory in Clacton will turn out to be an anomaly which can be contained locally after all. "
http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/107021/the_...
Interesting times we live in indeed
I am sure they are correct and everything will be fine
Meanwhile Steve Fisher's latest forecast is Cons 298 seats Lab 295 seats.
http://electionsetc.com/2014/10/24/forecast-update...
http://electionsetc.com/2014/10/24/forecast-update...
johnxjsc1985 said:
steveT350C said:
WinstonWolf said:
Indeed, because we all know politicians are exceptionally good at judging what the voting public will do.
and of course they always tell us what they really thinkNow, the opposite seems to be true - if you don't trust/believe in the establishment now, you're treated as a social leper and name-called very single word ending in 'ism' or 'phobe' under the sun - all because you're not perceived as a Kool-Aid rotten establishment follower!
All quite sad, really.
chris watton said:
Weird, isn't it - years ago, it was the norm for normal people to be distrustful of the establishment, and took what they were told by the establishment with a huge dose of salt.
Now, the opposite seems to be true - if you don't trust/believe in the establishment now, you're treated as a social leper and name-called very single word ending in 'ism' or 'phobe' under the sun - all because you're not perceived as a Kool-Aid rotten establishment follower!
All quite sad, really.
but at la.st we can take our revenge next May and I will be there at 7.0am to make my vote count Now, the opposite seems to be true - if you don't trust/believe in the establishment now, you're treated as a social leper and name-called very single word ending in 'ism' or 'phobe' under the sun - all because you're not perceived as a Kool-Aid rotten establishment follower!
All quite sad, really.
Conservative candidate for Rochester and Strood is an Anti-Israel activist and supports Hamas..
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
jogon said:
Conservative candidate for Rochester and Strood is an Anti-Israel activist and supports Hamas..
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
If she were the UKIP candidate this thread would explode. I expect we'll be seeing tumbleweed around these parts however.http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
Einion Yrth said:
jogon said:
Conservative candidate for Rochester and Strood is an Anti-Israel activist and supports Hamas..
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
If she were the UKIP candidate this thread would explode. I expect we'll be seeing tumbleweed around these parts however.http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
jogon said:
Conservative candidate for Rochester and Strood is an Anti-Israel activist and supports Hamas..
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
I hope the Conservatives lose next month in Rochester and Strood but nothing in that article suggests that she 'supports Hamas'. Yes she's anti Israel in terms of how it handles it's security but so are other Tory MPs - for example, Alan Duncan. http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/124677/anti-isra...
Wombat3 said:
Guam said:
Esseesse said:
The Tory's/Coalition have done everything they can to embed us more deeply into the EU, no different.
Indeed and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous at the least Vote in Parliament said:
Funding for EU propaganda, 14 Jan 2014
In the Union (Approvals) Bill the Government at the behest of the EU asked Parliament to approve the funding of the Europe for Citizens programme obliging taxpayers to fund propaganda promoting political union with Europe.
Result: AyeIn the Union (Approvals) Bill the Government at the behest of the EU asked Parliament to approve the funding of the Europe for Citizens programme obliging taxpayers to fund propaganda promoting political union with Europe.
Vote in Parliament said:
Holding the EU referendum in 2014, 22 Nov 2013
Instead of holding the referendum on EU membership in 2017 it was proposed to bring forward the national vote to 2014
Result: NoInstead of holding the referendum on EU membership in 2017 it was proposed to bring forward the national vote to 2014
Vote in Parliament said:
Regretting that the Government had failed to propose an EU referendum bill, 15 May 2013
Despite mounting pressure for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union the government did not propose to introduce a bill to bring this into national vote into being
Result: NoDespite mounting pressure for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union the government did not propose to introduce a bill to bring this into national vote into being
Vote in Parliament said:
EU referendum vote, 24 Oct 2011
Following on from a petition from the general public asking for a referendum on Britain's EU membership a motion was brought to the House of Commons to ask for such a vote. This received a great deal of opposition from the leadership of the three main political parties
Result: NoFollowing on from a petition from the general public asking for a referendum on Britain's EU membership a motion was brought to the House of Commons to ask for such a vote. This received a great deal of opposition from the leadership of the three main political parties
Vote in Parliament said:
International Monetary Fund (Increase in Subscription), 18 Jul 2011
The Government, via the IMF, is using British money to bail out the problems caused by the euro. However, 32 Conservative MPs voted against this misuse of funds. The £9.3 billion can be better used at home; instead the Government is borrowing this money and paying interest on it to offset the failure of the euro. George Eustice and Chris Heaton-Harris who recently criticised the bailouts and signed a letter to the Financial Times calling for the Government to "ensure that the current crisis in the eurozone is a beneficial crisis, not just a painful one" failed to join the rebels
Result: NoThe Government, via the IMF, is using British money to bail out the problems caused by the euro. However, 32 Conservative MPs voted against this misuse of funds. The £9.3 billion can be better used at home; instead the Government is borrowing this money and paying interest on it to offset the failure of the euro. George Eustice and Chris Heaton-Harris who recently criticised the bailouts and signed a letter to the Financial Times calling for the Government to "ensure that the current crisis in the eurozone is a beneficial crisis, not just a painful one" failed to join the rebels
Vote in Parliament said:
The right to a referendum on EU membership if the majority of those voting on a treaty oppose its ratification, 01 Feb 2011
During the debate on the EU Bill and the so-called ‘referendum lock’ it was proposed that in the event of a referendum on a future treaty if the British people oppose its ratification they will also be granted a referendum on Britain’s EU membership. The Government opposed this amendment.
Result: NoDuring the debate on the EU Bill and the so-called ‘referendum lock’ it was proposed that in the event of a referendum on a future treaty if the British people oppose its ratification they will also be granted a referendum on Britain’s EU membership. The Government opposed this amendment.
Vote in Parliament said:
Preventing the expansion of EU law over Justice and Home Affairs, 26 Jan 2011
An amendment was proposed to the Government's EU Bill which sought to constitutionally limit the growth of EU power over Justice and Home Affairs. The Government opposed this attempt to limit future increases in the EU's power in areas relating to crime and immigration.
Result: NoAn amendment was proposed to the Government's EU Bill which sought to constitutionally limit the growth of EU power over Justice and Home Affairs. The Government opposed this attempt to limit future increases in the EU's power in areas relating to crime and immigration.
Vote in Parliament said:
Stopping the Government adding to the Eurozone bailouts, 25 Jan 2011
An amendment was proposed to the Government’s EU Bill that would mean that if the Government were to contribute more taxpayers’ money to future bailouts of the Eurozone then a referendum would be triggered. The Government opposed this amendment.
Result: NoAn amendment was proposed to the Government’s EU Bill that would mean that if the Government were to contribute more taxpayers’ money to future bailouts of the Eurozone then a referendum would be triggered. The Government opposed this amendment.
Vote in Parliament said:
Affirming the Sovereignty of the UK Parliament, 11 Jan 2011
During the debate on the Government’s EU Bill a motion was moved to reaffirm the sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament in relation to EU law. This motion was opposed by the Government which has kept the supremacy of EU law over those laws made by our own democratic institutions.
Result: NoDuring the debate on the Government’s EU Bill a motion was moved to reaffirm the sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament in relation to EU law. This motion was opposed by the Government which has kept the supremacy of EU law over those laws made by our own democratic institutions.
That's all I can be bothered to dig up right now, but there are plenty more.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff