UKIP - The Future - Volume 3

[FiF]

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

sigh

[don4l]

league67 said:

Integrity and honesty? Where would you put nepotism? Is that trait of a honest or man with integrity? I do understand that you don't value education much. No surprises there. None at all.

For me, someone with integrity wouldn't work for an organization that he/she despises. Surrounded by homophobic morons. Instead of 'advisors', getting energy policy written by 'blogger' with a bad degree from poly. Quality all over.

As for Cameron; an average politician nothing more, will be forgotten quite quickly once he exits the stage. . Taking into account the state of economy and finances inherited from the previous bunch, I think that they've done remarkable job.

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

[mrpurple]

league67 said:

It is mystery why people consider 'kippers exceptionally thick. Few obvious exceptions, but mostly, bottom of the barrel.

Just as well most of us are thickos...how else would you entertain yourself?

[league67]

don4l said:

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

Angry towards? The answer is no, but I'm curious as to why would you think that.

[league67]

mrpurple said:

league67 said:

It is mystery why people consider 'kippers exceptionally thick. Few obvious exceptions, but mostly, bottom of the barrel.

Just as well most of us are thickos...how else would you entertain yourself?

True. Between 'kippers, homeopaths and audiophiles, it is hard to chose.

[Mr_B]

league67 said:

don4l said:

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

Angry towards? The answer is no, but I'm curious as to why would you think that.

Probably because he is wondering why you spend all your days writing over and over that people are thick because they don't vote the same way as you. You've said it multiple times yet do nothing more than say it over and over in a ' I enjoy the stink of my own farts' kinda way. Don't be too surprised if people wonder whats up with you.

[FiF]

Just to stir the pot and get some weekend trolltastic frothing. Some reading. Recommend the last one.

Why vote UKIP 2015


Why vote LibDem 2015




Sex, lies and the ballot box

[mrpurple]

league67 said:

Integrity and honesty? Where would you put nepotism? Is that trait of a honest or man with integrity?

So will CMD stop subsidising windfarms post GE or will Reg talk him round?

[NicD]

FiF said:

Just to stir the pot and get some weekend trolltastic frothing. Some reading. Recommend the last one.
Why vote UKIP 2015
Why vote LibDem 2015
Sex, lies and the ballot box

save you the bother of reading the ld farce
'The 2010 general election saw the largest popular vote for the Liberal Democrats since the party’s creation, but will they build on that success in 2015? Could they become partners in another coalition government or will they join the ranks in opposition?

In this concise and accessible guide, Liberal Democrat Jeremy Browne explains how the Lib Dems are best placed to tackle both the problems facing the nation today and those of its future – and why they deserve your vote on 7 May.'

[league67]

Mr_B said:

league67 said:

don4l said:

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

Angry towards? The answer is no, but I'm curious as to why would you think that.

Probably because he is wondering why you spend all your days writing over and over that people are thick because they don't vote the same way as you. You've said it multiple times yet do nothing more than say it over and over in a ' I enjoy the stink of my own farts' kinda way. Don't be too surprised if people wonder whats up with you.

'All my days'? PH takes couple of minutes. I never said that people are thick 'because they don't vote the same way'. I'll try once again. People are thick if they are buying NF's 'honest man down the pub with a pint' show. I don't believe that you can describe working for an organization that you despise, as an act of a man with integrity.

I don't understand the 'farts' bit. I'm not asking.

There are very few people whose opinion about myself I take into account. None of them are on PH. Hope that helps. It is most likely down to my English, but I don't know how to explain low-level entertainment any better than I did.

It is entertaining how you know what 'he is wondering' about. You are like his Alistair Campbell, of sorts.

[Mr_B]

league67 said:

Mr_B said:

league67 said:

don4l said:

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

Angry towards? The answer is no, but I'm curious as to why would you think that.

Probably because he is wondering why you spend all your days writing over and over that people are thick because they don't vote the same way as you. You've said it multiple times yet do nothing more than say it over and over in a ' I enjoy the stink of my own farts' kinda way. Don't be too surprised if people wonder whats up with you.

'All my days'? PH takes couple of minutes. I never said that people are thick 'because they don't vote the same way'. I'll try once again. People are thick if they are buying NF's 'honest man down the pub with a pint' show. I don't believe that you can describe working for an organization that you despise, as an act of a man with integrity.

I don't understand the 'farts' bit. I'm not asking.

There are very few people whose opinion about myself I take into account. None of them are on PH. Hope that helps. It is most likely down to my English, but I don't know how to explain low-level entertainment any better than I did.

It is entertaining how you know what 'he is wondering' about. You are like his Alistair Campbell, of sorts.

You come across as angry that people don't listen to you. You keep writing endlessly about how stupid they must be and add in your barbed comments on everyone and everything. It's a meaningless car forum and people you haven't and won't ever meet. Don't take it so seriously. There a touch of one of those nutty loner American school kids who don't get taken seriously or listened to and go get a gun and say 'I'll teach them to igniore me', about you. Sorry.

[mrpurple]

league67 said:

'All my days'? PH takes couple of minutes. I never said that people are thick 'because they don't vote the same way'. I'll try once again. People are thick if they are buying NF's 'honest man down the pub with a pint' show. I don't believe that you can describe working for an organization that you despise, as an act of a man with integrity.

I don't understand the 'farts' bit. I'm not asking.

There are very few people whose opinion about myself I take into account. None of them are on PH. Hope that helps. It is most likely down to my English, but I don't know how to explain low-level entertainment any better than I did.

It is entertaining how you know what 'he is wondering' about. You are like his Alistair Campbell, of sorts.

Well if you think people only vote UKIP because of your "'honest man down the pub with a pint'" assertion then sorry to say it could well be it is you who is the thicko... but I am of the opinion you should feel sorry for those less fortunate than yourself rather than mock them for your own entertainment. I would hasten to add it would seem, to this thicko, that the only opinion you value is your own....have a fun day.

[MGJohn]

league67 said:

Who are the 'paymasters'? I was under impression that his wealth was inherited from his father? You are also aware that he'd make tons more money once out of politics?

Or do you read this stuff on some obscure conspiracy site and repeat it ad nauseam in hope that you'll receive coveted '+1' from someone as equally bright?

Do remind me, who's paying Farage's salary, expenses, allowances, y'know, the gravy train stuff? And do that makes 'them' his paymasters? The good old principled 'No wifes employed, unless it's mine' Farage. I know, I know, it's all smear and lies.

It is mystery why people consider 'kippers exceptionally thick. Few obvious exceptions, but mostly, bottom of the barrel.

His party's paymaster. They call the tune. T'was and is always thus. Get it now?

Right off you go missing the obvious point to suit your narrowly focused agenda.

I have to admit I rarely run with the rest of the flock. What do I know. I actually admire some of Cameron's qualities. Even so.... He who ....... calls the tune.

Despite that, unlikely I'll be voting for him or his party come next May. Plus, currently I am convinced that two Eds will never be better than none. So, their incessant negativity falls on deaf ears here.

Irrespective of their leader's backing or what have you, I am convinced that UKIP, whether they survive and thrive or are soon to disappear like others who have previously shaken the complacent two party scenario. Here I have in mind the first past the post musical chairs scenario, UKIP have at the very least have had a beneficial wake up call effect with the two majors. Some of them appear to be actually listening. What good becomes of that I am certain will be limited. If UKIP's stance on things torpedoes the "It's your turn old boy" status, all power to Farage's elbows. He being the most impressive "tell it like it is" individual in the UK political scene for yonks in my view.

[NicD]

league67 said:

People are thick if they are buying NF's 'honest man down the pub with a pint' show. I don't believe that you can describe working for an organization that you despise, as an act of a man with integrity.

are you saying an MEP works for an organisation in the same way you do? (assumption there)

its good you mention thick as it really does fit.

An MEP REPRESENTS their constituents, does not work for the European Commission or any other Euro thingy.

Since it is clear, we cannot change the way the sthole works, the only alternative is to get out - not out of Europe as that is geographical, but out of the ever closer tentacles of the EU.

[don4l]

league67 said:

Mr_B said:

league67 said:

don4l said:

Are we feeling a teensy weensy bit angry?

Angry towards? The answer is no, but I'm curious as to why would you think that.

Probably because he is wondering why you spend all your days writing over and over that people are thick because they don't vote the same way as you. You've said it multiple times yet do nothing more than say it over and over in a ' I enjoy the stink of my own farts' kinda way. Don't be too surprised if people wonder whats up with you.

'All my days'? PH takes couple of minutes. I never said that people are thick 'because they don't vote the same way'. I'll try once again. People are thick if they are buying NF's 'honest man down the pub with a pint' show. I don't believe that you can describe working for an organization that you despise, as an act of a man with integrity.

I don't understand the 'farts' bit. I'm not asking.

There are very few people whose opinion about myself I take into account. None of them are on PH. Hope that helps. It is most likely down to my English, but I don't know how to explain low-level entertainment any better than I did.

It is entertaining how you know what 'he is wondering' about. You are like his Alistair Campbell, of sorts.

You don't care about our opinions, and yet you take the time to come on here and post repetitive nonsense?

"Nepotism....Wife... Nepotism... wife..." ad nauseum.

It all sounds a bit angry to me. If you don't want to get upset, then don't look at the opinion polls.

[Mojocvh]

league67 said:

Surrounded by homophobic morons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Coburn_%28polit...

"David Coburn describes himself as a libertarian and he has vowed to pursue a hardline "libertarian agenda", working closely with the so-called 'London Elite'. He said he wanted businesses to be free of interference from government. Coburn favours the legalisation of recreational drugs, believing that banning drugs causes crime.[2] He has spoken out against Scottish independence during an interview on the BBC's referendum flagship show 'Scotland Decides'. During this interview he also claimed UKIP are the most 'unracist' political party. Despite being gay himself, he feels that gay marriage should not be allowed as it causes homophobia from religious people, and that civil partnerships suffice.[2] He opposes Scottish Independence."


Next uncalled and offensive smear please.

[NicD]

Mojocvh said:

league67 said:

Surrounded by homophobic morons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Coburn_%28polit...

"David Coburn describes himself as a libertarian and he has vowed to pursue a hardline "libertarian agenda", working closely with the so-called 'London Elite'. He said he wanted businesses to be free of interference from government. Coburn favours the legalisation of recreational drugs, believing that banning drugs causes crime.[2] He has spoken out against Scottish independence during an interview on the BBC's referendum flagship show 'Scotland Decides'. During this interview he also claimed UKIP are the most 'unracist' political party. Despite being gay himself, he feels that gay marriage should not be allowed as it causes homophobia from religious people, and that civil partnerships suffice.[2] He opposes Scottish Independence."


Next uncalled and offensive smear please.

maybe the clown is talking about being 'surrounded' by deriders of UKIP? If so, certainly correct about the moron part.

[dandarez]

JBF50 said:

Since when has a millionaire ex-public-school stockbroker been a victim of financial mismanagement? I will give him kudos for managing to benefit from the "personalities before principles" which sadly dominates UK Politics. If he'd have died in his plane-crash UKIP would have too, without him they'd be nowhere.

How stupid. UKIP with or without Farage would be nowhere if the other parties did what the electorate wished. They don't! Hence the rise of UKIP.

I sort of joked in a thread on here back in May 2010 that...
'God had saved Farage in the crash because we would sorely need him in the future'.

Prophetic, eh? or fate? who knows?


I usually add to my threads, 'wait and see'.

Here's one from 2010 just prior the General Election.

dandarez said:

remedy said:

dandarez said:

I live in Cameron's constituency but the moment he dropped the Referendum he lost my vote.

Danderez, I need to bring you up on this. At the time of the treaty being signed, the media jumped on Cameron for 'going back on his word'. But he didn't. He stated that he would hold a referendum in the event of the tories coming to power if the treaty had not been ratified.

As soon as it was signed by the Czech Republic he wasn't able to fulfill his promise. The media still chose to tow the line that the tories had back-tracked without stating the facts.

You don't need to bring me up on it. I know what happened but he could still have given us the Referendum... UKIP have said they will! So just on principle they get my vote. Cameron did go back on his word, you read what he originally said! Sod the fact that it's ratified, MANY of us want out. It won't matter who wins if we remain in, the EU will have us by both balls, not just the one, in 3 to 5 years. Parliament will be absolutely toothless. Wait and see.

Remind me, what was the EU demanding from us this week?

[FiF]

To be fair the LD one was included as balance and at that point hadn't found the Con/Lab versions. Links below.


https://www.bitebackpublishing.com/books/why-vote-...

https://www.bitebackpublishing.com/books/why-vote-...

NicD said:

FiF said:

Just to stir the pot and get some weekend trolltastic frothing. Some reading. Recommend the last one.
Why vote UKIP 2015
Why vote LibDem 2015
Sex, lies and the ballot box

save you the bother of reading the ld farce
'The 2010 general election saw the largest popular vote for the Liberal Democrats since the party’s creation, but will they build on that success in 2015? Could they become partners in another coalition government or will they join the ranks in opposition?

In this concise and accessible guide, Liberal Democrat Jeremy Browne explains how the Lib Dems are best placed to tackle both the problems facing the nation today and those of its future – and why they deserve your vote on 7 May.'

[Scuffers]

JBF50 said:

Since when has a millionaire ex-public-school stockbroker

I was not aware that:

1) he is a millionaire?
2) he was ever a stockbroker?

care to back this up with some evidence?