UKIP - The Future - Volume 3

[FiF]

Of course being someone who, apparently, just trawls the wider extent of the Internet in order to find articles praising the Great Gospel according to St. Nigel, then my posts on 7th November raising this internal strife and Denny's stinging resignation letter, coupled with a warning to his Nigelness to obey his own rules, clearly must have been posted by another person using my account.

Who was it? Oh it was me. Oops, must try to be more partisan.

[league67]

steveT350C said:

league67 said:

More from orchestrated 'MSM' onslaught;

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-ukip-aide...

http://douglasdenny.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/10/12/ukips-roger-h...

Way too funny.

I'll raise you.....

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5374/tooting...

You'll 'raise me' with an article by a kipper candidate bhing about bias?

Helmer said:

The East Midlands MEP has also compared same-sex marriage to incest, saying: “If two men have a right to marry, how can we deny the same right to two siblings? Are we to authorise incest?

Which of the articles linked do you consider 'smear'?

[don4l]

league67 said:

Once again I find myself feeling charitable.

If you listen very carefully you'll hear the sound of nobody being surprised that you don't get points. If you can't figure out that typing 'I myself like gays' makes you incredibly stupid, then I gave you too much credit by calling you exceptionally stupid.

You take your time.

What is it about "gays" that you dislike?

Why is it incredibly stupid to like gay people?

How good does it feel to attempt to use political correctness to denigrate someone?

Is it acceptable to discriminate against someone because they might have a slightly different opinion to you?

Would you have enjoyed yourself as a Spanish Inquisitor?

Hypocrite!

Can you not find somewhere where your moral and intellectual superiority would be welcomed?

[steveT350C]

league67 said:

steveT350C said:

league67 said:

More from orchestrated 'MSM' onslaught;

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-ukip-aide...

http://douglasdenny.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/10/12/ukips-roger-h...

Way too funny.

I'll raise you.....

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5374/tooting...

You'll 'raise me' with an article by a kipper candidate bhing about bias?

Helmer said:

The East Midlands MEP has also compared same-sex marriage to incest, saying: “If two men have a right to marry, how can we deny the same right to two siblings? Are we to authorise incest?

Which of the articles linked do you consider 'smear'?

Just trying to raise you up to, say, Wombat's level of discussion.

All you you are doing is trying to divert attention away from the fact that UKIP, whilst only having two MPs, are a major player in Westminster thinking.

To say that UKIP are 'Punching above their weight' may be conservative.

[chris watton]

steveT350C said:

To say that UKIP are 'Punching above their weight' may be conservative.

[league67]

don4l said:

league67 said:

Once again I find myself feeling charitable.

If you listen very carefully you'll hear the sound of nobody being surprised that you don't get points. If you can't figure out that typing 'I myself like gays' makes you incredibly stupid, then I gave you too much credit by calling you exceptionally stupid.

You take your time.

What is it about "gays" that you dislike?

Why is it incredibly stupid to like gay people?

How good does it feel to attempt to use political correctness to denigrate someone?

Is it acceptable to discriminate against someone because they might have a slightly different opinion to you?

Would you have enjoyed yourself as a Spanish Inquisitor?

Hypocrite!

Can you not find somewhere where your moral and intellectual superiority would be welcomed?

LOL. Did you actually post that? From my posts you managed to draw conclusion that I dislike gays? You seem to be slower than Nicd. Which is quite an achievement.

[league67]

steveT350C said:

league67 said:

steveT350C said:

league67 said:

More from orchestrated 'MSM' onslaught;

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-ukip-aide...

http://douglasdenny.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/10/12/ukips-roger-h...

Way too funny.

I'll raise you.....

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/5374/tooting...

You'll 'raise me' with an article by a kipper candidate bhing about bias?

Helmer said:

The East Midlands MEP has also compared same-sex marriage to incest, saying: “If two men have a right to marry, how can we deny the same right to two siblings? Are we to authorise incest?

Which of the articles linked do you consider 'smear'?

Just trying to raise you up to, say, Wombat's level of discussion.

All you you are doing is trying to divert attention away from the fact that UKIP, whilst only having two MPs, are a major player in Westminster thinking.

To say that UKIP are 'Punching above their weight' may be conservative.

So, as expected, no answer to the question which link(s) are smear? Which of them are made up to sully good UKIP name?

Seems that some kippers have difficulty answering the simplest of questions. And I do try to tailor my questions to the intended audience.

[TankRizzo]

Troll, troll, troll your boat..

[XJ Flyer]

league67 said:

More from orchestrated 'MSM' onslaught;

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-ukip-aide...

More like even the socialists are running as scared of losing the Labour vote to UKIP as the Cons are of losing their's.

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/next-christmas-jobs-...

[XJ Flyer]

league67 said:

You'll 'raise me' with an article by a kipper candidate bhing about bias?

Helmer said:

The East Midlands MEP has also compared same-sex marriage to incest, saying: “If two men have a right to marry, how can we deny the same right to two siblings? Are we to authorise incest?

Which of the articles linked do you consider 'smear'?

On the subject of heterosexual rights maybe the better question would be why did the BBC try to paint a picture of legal relationships between cousins as being borderline incest.While being happy enough to broadcast continuous examples of blokes snogging each others' faces off in East Enders storylines.

[JustAnotherLogin]

FiF said:

JustAnotherLogin said:

Lots has been said on here about how many seats are expected, and by implication what would be seen as a success for UKIp, what about the % of votes. What would be a "good" result for UKIP at the GE in those terms?

Have no need to restate what my opinion is about seat potential. Covered that also.

Hmm. This can't be the same Fif who called me stupid on another thread because I failed to correctly pick up on which post another was replying to? What does that make someone who can't even read a single post correctly?

[steveT350C]

TankRizzo said:

Troll, troll, troll your boat..

gently down the stream
League, Wombat and the rest,
U - kippers dream.


Troll troll troll your boat,
gently down the river,
Fruitcake racist loonies
UKIP's a winner.

Troll troll troll your boat
gently into shore
LibLabCon are sinking
No more EU law

Troll troll troll your boat,
gently out to sea....................

[Einion Yrth]

XJ Flyer said:

On the subject of heterosexual rights maybe the better question would be why did the BBC try to paint a picture of legal relationships between cousins as being borderline incest.While being happy enough to broadcast continuous examples of blokes snogging each others' faces off.

Whilst legal, first cousins breeding with each other is genetically "ill advised". Blokes, no matter how closely related, aren't going to be breeding with each other any time soon. As an aside I wonder how comfortable the BBC would be if the blokes sucking each others faces had been brothers.

[XJ Flyer]

Einion Yrth said:

XJ Flyer said:

On the subject of heterosexual rights maybe the better question would be why did the BBC try to paint a picture of legal relationships between cousins as being borderline incest.While being happy enough to broadcast continuous examples of blokes snogging each others' faces off.

Whilst legal, first cousins breeding with each other is genetically "ill advised".

In which case the present Royal family since the marriage of Victoria and Albert wouldn't be here.Which is ironic considering the pub at the centre of proceedings in East Enders.

[Einion Yrth]

XJ Flyer said:

Einion Yrth said:

XJ Flyer said:

On the subject of heterosexual rights maybe the better question would be why did the BBC try to paint a picture of legal relationships between cousins as being borderline incest.While being happy enough to broadcast continuous examples of blokes snogging each others' faces off.

Whilst legal, first cousins breeding with each other is genetically "ill advised".

In which case the present Royal family since the marriage of Victoria and Albert wouldn't be here.Which is ironic considering the pub at the centre of proceedings in East Enders.

It's not like the shennanigans involved in matter/anti-matter collisions but it does increase the risks of genetically inherited diseases like haemophilia, demonstrated in Victoria's bloodline (in the Russian bit at least) and porphyria (arguably the madness of King George III).

[XJ Flyer]

Einion Yrth said:

XJ Flyer said:

Einion Yrth said:

XJ Flyer said:

On the subject of heterosexual rights maybe the better question would be why did the BBC try to paint a picture of legal relationships between cousins as being borderline incest.While being happy enough to broadcast continuous examples of blokes snogging each others' faces off.

Whilst legal, first cousins breeding with each other is genetically "ill advised".

In which case the present Royal family since the marriage of Victoria and Albert wouldn't be here.Which is ironic considering the pub at the centre of proceedings in East Enders.

It's not like the shennanigans involved in matter/anti-matter collisions but it does increase the risks of genetically inherited diseases like haemophilia, demonstrated in Victoria's bloodline (in the Russian bit at least) and porphyria (arguably the madness of King George III).

Going back to the circumstances as I remember it the 'drama' which was portrayed in the storyline went a 'bit' further than just telling the couple go ahead its legal but 'possibly' there is a ( slight ) chance that it might be ill advised on genetic grounds.Although no worse,probably less,than that of the current trend towards older mothers as portrayed in the case of Kat for example.Which then leaves the question of the next massive drama when Max was getting off with Lucy.Let me guess his older genes mixed with her younger ones just blew the minds of the gay cause running through the programme's content commissar police.

[anonymous-user]

NicD said:

This looks good!


Switzerland votes on ending mass immigration
The controversial Ecopop movement wants to slash the numbers entering the coutry from 80,000 a year to just 16,000

why cant we have a vote?



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/swi...

Sounds like a brilliant idea!

Except the Swiss rejected the proposal: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30267042

Decisively.

74% against the proposal.

Happy with a similar outcome here?

[BooHoo]

JustAnotherLogin said:

FiF said:

JustAnotherLogin said:

Lots has been said on here about how many seats are expected, and by implication what would be seen as a success for UKIp, what about the % of votes. What would be a "good" result for UKIP at the GE in those terms?

Have no need to restate what my opinion is about seat potential. Covered that also.

Hmm. This can't be the same Fif who called me stupid on another thread because I failed to correctly pick up on which post another was replying to? What does that make someone who can't even read a single post correctly?

You admitted that you were only skim reading the thread, yet it's someone else's fault that you failed to understand?

[Benbay001]

Why do we have to reduce it? As long as we can choose who comes in then i couldnt give a damn what the figure is.

[XJ Flyer]

Greg66 said:

NicD said:

This looks good!


Switzerland votes on ending mass immigration
The controversial Ecopop movement wants to slash the numbers entering the coutry from 80,000 a year to just 16,000

why cant we have a vote?



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/swi...

Sounds like a brilliant idea!

Except the Swiss rejected the proposal: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30267042

Decisively.

74% against the proposal.

Happy with a similar outcome here?

Firstly it would be interesting to find out if the immigrant communities were also allowed to vote in the referendum being that turkeys don't generally vote for christmas.While it seems obvious that the cheap labour pro immigration pro EU agenda there is obviously happy to selectively accept that vote while not being so keen to implement the results of the previous one.That is in addition to obvious outside pressure from the EU to get the result it wanted.Having said that I can see many indigenous ( at least German ) Swiss now using the same freedom of movement to flee the country to Bavaria and the Austrian Tyrol where ironically they'll find more resistance to immigration than at home.