UKIP - The Future - Volume 3

[Art0ir]

Einion Yrth said:

I'd have felt more tempted to feel sympathetic if he'd been caught stealing, say potatoes. But eleven hundred quids worth of vodka?

So he could make his own vodka?

[allergictocheese]

What appears to be increasingly obvious is that UKIP are not as relevant in General Elections as they are in EU ones. They are nowhere near leading the narrative as they were in the EU elections and they don't appear to have anything interesting to say.

After the budget yesterday I'd put a decent wager on the Conservatives winning an outright majority or requiring a small amount out help, with UKIP having absolutely no say in the matter whatsoever.

Back to reality for Farage & Co.

[Esseesse]

Scuffers said:

Absolute tosh

Did you listen to the budget today?

Our economy's growing, exports are up, at the same time, EU is stagnating, economies are shrinking.

They are soon going to be in no economic position to demand anything, if we pull out, their downfall will accelerate, how are they then going to dictate terms?

They cannot afford a trade war, yes, it would be painful to us, but it would be catastrophic for them.

I agree with you that we should leave, however I don't believe our economy is in the shape Mr Osborne likes to make out it is.

https://woodfordfunds.com/budget-surplus-reality-c...

[jogon]

allergictocheese said:

What appears to be increasingly obvious is that UKIP are not as relevant in General Elections as they are in EU ones. They are nowhere near leading the narrative as they were in the EU elections and they don't appear to have anything interesting to say.

After the budget yesterday I'd put a decent wager on the Conservatives winning an outright majority or requiring a small amount out help, with UKIP having absolutely no say in the matter whatsoever.

Back to reality for Farage & Co.

Where you a sleep last week when Farage was trending Twitter and on every newspaper front page..

There is no narrative from any of the parties apart from the budget yesterday. The general mass seem more interested in what colour a dress is than anything LibLabCon have to say.

[Bill]

cookie118 said:

Mojocvh said:

But you spectacularly demonstrate your own prejudice by your inaction on others...

"you couldn't make this up"

I've never known an image with a swear word on it stay up?

If we miss any then there's a report button.

[Zod]

BGARK said:

Zod said:

we are likely to have to agree to at least some aspects of free movement of people.

So why don't we do that now with the rest of the world?

Is the rest of the world the EU? Have we been in a grouping like the EU, involving free movement, with other countries?

[Zod]

jogon said:

allergictocheese said:

What appears to be increasingly obvious is that UKIP are not as relevant in General Elections as they are in EU ones. They are nowhere near leading the narrative as they were in the EU elections and they don't appear to have anything interesting to say.

After the budget yesterday I'd put a decent wager on the Conservatives winning an outright majority or requiring a small amount out help, with UKIP having absolutely no say in the matter whatsoever.

Back to reality for Farage & Co.

Where you a sleep last week when Farage was trending Twitter and on every newspaper front page..

There is no narrative from any of the parties apart from the budget yesterday. The general mass seem more interested in what colour a dress is than anything LibLabCon have to say.

Because of the serialisation of his book in the Telegraph? All that has come out is that he wants to do a deal with the Tories and that he is in poor physical shape.

[jogon]

Zod said:

Because of the serialisation of his book in the Telegraph? All that has come out is that he wants to do a deal with the Tories and that he is in poor physical shape.

Immigration, immigration, immigration.

[Bill]

Newspapers need filling, and a flamboyant character is always welcome when nothing else is happening.

[BGARK]

Zod said:

Is the rest of the world the EU? Have we been in a grouping like the EU, involving free movement, with other countries?

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

[Scuffers]

Bill said:

Newspapers need filling, and a flamboyant character is always welcome when nothing else is happening.

nothing else happening?

what?

so I imagined the budget yesterday?

must also have imagined the Election in Israel?

Or the shooting in Tunisia?

[Zod]

BGARK said:

Zod said:

Is the rest of the world the EU? Have we been in a grouping like the EU, involving free movement, with other countries?

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

What?

[Scuffers]

Zod said:

BGARK said:

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

What?

it's not that hard to understand.

he is suggesting your racist because you're all for EU open doors but not to the rest of the world.

[Bill]

Scuffers said:

nothing else happening?

what?

so I imagined the budget yesterday?

must also have imagined the Election in Israel?

Or the shooting in Tunisia?

That's this week. Last week NF was in the papers, this week there's some actual news.

[Zod]

Scuffers said:

Zod said:

BGARK said:

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

What?

it's not that hard to understand.

he is suggesting your racist because you're all for EU open doors but not to the rest of the world.

I made a point about my view on the outcome of negotiations of trade agreements and you and he decided that my making that point meant that I want unrestricted movement of people form the EU, but not elsewhere, so I am a racist.

His right and yours to think that, but it indicates that each of you is a moron.

[Scuffers]

Bill said:

That's this week. Last week NF was in the papers, this week there's some actual news.

Ah, OK.

So Clarkson was not on any front pages?

[Zod]

Scuffers said:

Bill said:

That's this week. Last week NF was in the papers, this week there's some actual news.

Ah, OK.

So Clarkson was not on any front pages?

Yes, indeed he was, more even than sickly Farage who really wants to do a deal with the Tories.

[Bill]

Scuffers said:

Ah, OK.

So Clarkson was not on any front pages?

I'm not sure who got more column inches tbh.

[BGARK]

Zod said:

Scuffers said:

Zod said:

BGARK said:

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

What?

it's not that hard to understand.

he is suggesting your racist because you're all for EU open doors but not to the rest of the world.

I made a point about my view on the outcome of negotiations of trade agreements and you and he decided that my making that point meant that I want unrestricted movement of people form the EU, but not elsewhere, so I am a racist.

His right and yours to think that, but it indicates that each of you is a moron.

Funny how others understand but you cannot, who is the moron?

[Einion Yrth]

BGARK said:

Zod said:

Scuffers said:

Zod said:

BGARK said:

Your point appears to be that it is fine for free movement of criminals, and people with zero skills but the free movement of people who can contribute and be useful (yes from outside of the EU) you don't want them here, a bit racist no?

What?

it's not that hard to understand.

he is suggesting your racist because you're all for EU open doors but not to the rest of the world.

I made a point about my view on the outcome of negotiations of trade agreements and you and he decided that my making that point meant that I want unrestricted movement of people form the EU, but not elsewhere, so I am a racist.

His right and yours to think that, but it indicates that each of you is a moron.

Funny how others understand but you cannot, who is the moron?

He's a lawyer; he misunderstands things for a living.