UKIP - The Future - Volume 3

[Timsta]

Zod said:

see that you are an idiot, unworthy of further engagement.

I'll take that as a yes then.

[NicD]

Zod calls others idiot while writing subnormal posts. Sad.

[Zod]

NicD said:

Zod calls others idiot while writing subnormal posts. Sad.

From you, that's almost a badge of honour.

[smn159]

Timsta said:

Zod said:

You think it acceptable to say that I am a supporter of paedophile facilitators?

They facilitated peadophiles. Do you support them?

I suppose that by that logic you are a supporter of fraudsters, benefit cheats and racists, correct?

[jjlynn27]

brenflys777 said:

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

Firstly, I think you'd find that making assumptions about the level of literacy and educational qualifications of UKIP supporters is nonsense. In the case of bad speeeling you may find that they feel self confident enough not to give a st at the occasional error if the meaning is clear!

Secondly I'd disagree with most of what you wrote, but as soon as I see someone write "peace be upon him" after Farage I make an assumption that they aren't worth bothering with...

You are right; inability to type simple sentence is clear sign of self confidence. You and WC (aptly named) should stand as UKIP candidates. You both seem eminently qualified, and exceptionally self confident.

[handpaper]

Gentlemen, there are matters on this thread worthy of discussion. Unfortunately, I'm finding it difficult to find them among the name-calling, offence-taking, pedantry and desperate grabbing for the wrong end of the stick.


If we can confine ourselves to commenting on stories and opinions, and avoid personalities, this place will be (I think) a lot happier and more productive. Take a look at the "Is this the end for the Euro" threads to see what I mean.

[jjlynn27]

NicD said:

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

This is the first time I have read a post by you, and now I see what a jerk you are, I can avoid reading any more.

And there was me hoping that we would be best friends forever. Clearly my loss.

[WinstonWolf]

jjlynn27 said:

brenflys777 said:

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

Firstly, I think you'd find that making assumptions about the level of literacy and educational qualifications of UKIP supporters is nonsense. In the case of bad speeeling you may find that they feel self confident enough not to give a st at the occasional error if the meaning is clear!

Secondly I'd disagree with most of what you wrote, but as soon as I see someone write "peace be upon him" after Farage I make an assumption that they aren't worth bothering with...

You are right; inability to type simple sentence is clear sign of self confidence. You and WC (aptly named) should stand as UKIP candidates. You both seem eminently qualified, and exceptionally self confident.

If you're going to pick someone up on their grammar you should make a bit more effort with your own...

[jjlynn27]

Timsta said:

jjlynn27 said:

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

Keep it up. That's what drives more supporters to UKIP.

You are suggesting that my opinion of an average UKIP supporter being thick, old, ill-educated and illiterate drives more supporters to UKIP? I don't want to be rude, so I'll ask this in a nicest possible way; Are you an idiot?

[jjlynn27]

WinstonWolf said:

If you're going to pick someone up on their grammar you should make a bit more effort with your own...

WinstonWolf, the ONLY person who thought that my post about 'every odd bit of every even byte goes via different cable' was serious. UKIP-er? If not, you should be.

[don4l]

jjlynn27 said:

Timsta said:

jjlynn27 said:

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

Keep it up. That's what drives more supporters to UKIP.

You are suggesting that my opinion of an average UKIP supporter being thick, old, ill-educated and illiterate drives more supporters to UKIP? I don't want to be rude, so I'll ask this in a nicest possible way; Are you an idiot?

I was tempted to ask you the same question, but I don't need to.

[flyingvisit]

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

"...downright illiterate people..."

Do you mean this sort of thing?

• "victim-hood"

• "were interrupting lunch of"

• "disproportionate amount of ill-educated"

• "self serving"

• "As the time goes by"

• "once they've found new god to worship"

• "If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be"

Just asking.

[egor110]

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

If the above is true , so what.

We live in a country where we are free to vote for what ever party we feel best represents us, even the illiterate's as you put it.

There vote is just as important as yours.

This whole thread is interesting in that supporters of various non ukip parties come here saying why we shouldn't vote ukip, yet those pro ukip seems fine with other people voting for whatever party they like.

[Axionknight]

flyingvisit said:

"...downright illiterate people..."

Do you mean this sort of thing?

• "victim-hood"

• "were interrupting lunch of"

• "disproportionate amount of ill-educated"

• "self serving"

• "As the time goes by"

• "once they've found new god to worship"

• "If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be"

Just asking.

[Yazar]

BlackLabel said:

And this was the person who tipped the group off.



https://twitter.com/chrisjvenables

https://www.facebook.com/chrisjvenables

That tweet hasn't gone well for him, as just clicked and he has now removed public access to both twitter and facebook.

Not surprising seeing as it was an attack on a family.

[Axionknight]

Wahay page 500!

[Yazar]

Axionknight said:

Wahay page 500!

If you are a noob who has kept the page length sertting to default then yes it will be. For the rest of us it is page 125!

Hope you enjoyed all those extra mouse clicks

[mrpurple]

Yazar said:

Axionknight said:

Wahay page 500!

If you are a noob who has kept the page length sertting to default then yes it will be. For the rest of us it is page 125!

Hope you enjoyed all those extra mouse clicks

Well we are all left behinds that can't work a computer

[don4l]

flyingvisit said:

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

"...downright illiterate people..."

Do you mean this sort of thing?

• "victim-hood"

• "were interrupting lunch of"

• "disproportionate amount of ill-educated"

• "self serving"

• "As the time goes by"

• "once they've found new god to worship"

• "If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be"

Just asking.

I'm sure that jj was just pretending to be illiterate for the comedy effect.

He has an excellent sense of humour.

I mean, nobody could have a mistake in every sentence of a post that complains about illiterate people. Too funny!

[flyingvisit]

don4l said:

flyingvisit said:

jjlynn27 said:

'these sought of people'?

AFAIC most politicians are the same, self serving careerists. What I find eternally entertaining is the level of victim-hood among supporters of UKIP. So, the serving prime minister should comment that a bunch of losers were interrupting lunch of a minor celebrity? Would you expect Farage (peace be upon him) to denounce if someone interrupted Ed's lunch?

UKIP attracts, if you are to judge by this thread, disproportionate amount of ill-educated and in some cases downright illiterate people, who need to blame someone else for their own failures. These are the same revolutionaries who once upon a time adored Che. As the time goes by, they'll be the first to turn on Farage once they've found new god to worship. If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be quite frightening.

"...downright illiterate people..."

Do you mean this sort of thing?

• "victim-hood"

• "were interrupting lunch of"

• "disproportionate amount of ill-educated"

• "self serving"

• "As the time goes by"

• "once they've found new god to worship"

• "If it wasn't this entertaining predictability of posts would be"

Just asking.

I'm sure that jj was just pretending to be illiterate for the comedy effect.

He has an excellent sense of humour.

I mean, nobody could have a mistake in every sentence of a post that complains about illiterate people. Too funny!

Well, bugger me with a whoosh parrot. I never thought of that


P.S I've just spotted one more, but I really can't be arsed.