The peado finder general appointment
Discussion
The more you think about a suitable inquisitor who is not susceptible to career or social blackmail, above bribery or resistant to personal threats of disadvantage, who wouldn't cave in to quiet suggestions to 'consider the bigger picture old chap', the more you realise just how impoverished we are in the men-of-honour department. A start might be made by making it legally compulsory to attend (subpoena)when required and to give evidence under oath. Some hope.
desolate said:
Frybywire said:
A respected US District Attorney.
that is a good starting point.http://www.cjsevents.co.uk/13/71/local-policing-an...
Is Optimus Prime available? Does he have hands to be clean, and is he foreign? I am assuming that Optimus Prime is an American?
g3org3y said:
Foliage said:
Monkey Dust <3
Oh and OP, it's paedo.
Monkey Dust was very good, though it's saddening thinking of the Jihad Brothers and recent events in Canada, but the BBC mentioned radicalised young Muslims in Canada that seem to rebel at their parents and families buying into 'Western' values a few years ago now.
This investigation by Fiona Wolff that's a concerned Mother and Grandmother with friends and contacts in high places (3,000 person Xmas card list - I assume she buys her own stamps?) that's been concerned about the number of reports of child abuse did nothing about it. So she could have poked her oar in if she was that concerned but hasn't. Surely with the friends in high places she has she could provide documentary evidence of where she's sent a brief note or letter to a Govt. Minister saying that she was concerned about the sexual abuse of minors and that something should be done about it?
The investigation isn't into Paedos. It's into how public sector institutions dealt with allegations and reports of child sexual abuse.
So rather like the revelations of Ann Lucas the former police officer in Sheffield that retired in 2012, South Yorks. Police got a Fair grade on the audit into how they dealt with child sex allegations, but that audit didn't look at crimes or victims, it looked at procedures and processes. This investigation to be chaired by Fiona Wolff will just look at procedures and processes and what was done. It won't be fingering paedophiles.
Will the Report make any difference? Look at the Bichard Report. Three police forces were made aware of what the former Frontman of LostProphets was up to with minors and they did Sweet FA. His crimes against minors were found after a Drugs bust. And then BiB wonder why I may not buy into them or respect their word?
smegmore said:
kowalski655 said:
TTwiggy said:
I'd go with Breadvan72.
+1 
Get someone with any gumption scratching the surface and you'd soon find out how rotten the whole monoculture is. It's like the Football league tables with different teams and players. 'Political footballs'?
I know a local Councillor intent on being an MP next year. I've kind of bought into them, will give them the time of day but at least one thing they've said is vacuous hype that could seem like same waste product, different day. I offered to meet with them as I wanted to discuss at least one serious incident on their patch (not child sex abuse). Besides wanting to let them know about that, I thought it would give them an opportunity to get involved with something in their ward as there was criticism that they were never there and they were only seen at voting time. Some have opined that the Councillor role is just a stepping stone to their ambition to become an MP. That opinion could have some validity, but they have done some pretty good stuff before others have which is one reason why I bought into them. Despite having met me in three different capacities they never got back to me about meeting.
That aspiring MP Tweets everything, I've yet to see them Tweet that they're sat on the throne, but that Tweet may not be far away. If they'd met with me they'd have found out some useful information. They didn't. They've since Tweeted a Selfie with one of the dodgy people they'd have known about if they'd met me for a tea or coffee. They've since Tweeted an image of where they've caught someone out, a bit like police cars parked in the disabled bays at the supermarket, or on the double yellows at a junction. So another Tweet would seem to indicate that they're a bit of a tool, as if they'd met me they could have avoided having a Selfie taken with a dodgy person that's committed far worse than the trivial infraction they've Tweeted an image of. I don't like the infraction or what's shown, but I am more taken that the aspiring MP has Tweeted an image of minor misdemeanour while getting their photo taken with someone hiding a hillock of far worse stuff.
Perhaps I am the same as the aspiring MP as just as they think they've scored a Twitter point by sending out an image of a minor infraction, I think I have the upper hand in that I now have two failures on their part tucked away. I should blow the whistle on their slight fakeness? I have thought of warning them via an elder statesman in their party. But I am obviously wondering how many little faux pas they make while what some may think is shameless self promotion via Twitter. They're another example of how out of touch the mainstream parties are. They're using Twitter to show themselves as being a bit of a tool.
The Tweeting MP would have made a great Monkey Dust character, though there could be some bleed over with the Jihad Brothers given whatever Brooks Newmark was doing in Syria.
Edited by carinaman on Thursday 23 October 06:19
Vaud said:
I don't think an entire nation has been tarnished by one action.
Agreed, I was joshing, but that reminds me that I need to tip them off about the EXPOSED campaign that they'll get with the G20 summit. I don't know how those MPs can present the G20 with a petition campaigning about the lack of probity in public life while keeping schtum about Butler-Sloss and Wolff.Toto Wolff? Niki Lauda? Sir Frank Williams?
They'd all do a better job.
That stuff I've just seen on the Daily Mail website with a photo showing her with Mrs Brittan at an event later than the one she stated in writing means she should be gone.
Someone needs to explain to Theresa May that this nonsense is a vote loser.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff