Tories the future (part1)
Discussion
BlackLabel said:
"The NHS would be as safe as a pet hamster in the presence of hungry python if Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Iain Duncan Smith rose to power following Brexit, Sir John Major has said."
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/05/jo...
What a horrible campaign number 10 are running (and Major is a fool for being used as a pawn) - they are willing to do anything to win the referendum even if that means ripping apart their own party.
What a wker another tory leader who fked you, the ERM .... Christ you would think the st would keep his head down http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/05/jo...
What a horrible campaign number 10 are running (and Major is a fool for being used as a pawn) - they are willing to do anything to win the referendum even if that means ripping apart their own party.
and we think Gordon and Tony were bad !! the arrogance of 3rd rate politicans
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
Jacob Rees-Mogg on Radio 4’s Westminster Hour.
The Mogg said:
What we’ve had today are the bitter ramblings of a vengeful man,
He is the man who took us into the Exchange Rate Mechanism, destroyed hundreds of thousands of jobs, had people evicted from their homes and led to the destruction of businesses for the sake of his failed European policy.
And now he says things that are both hypocritical and untrue in his attack on Boris. And how magnanimous Boris was in saying we should rise above it; well, I’m going to sling the mud straight back at Sir John Major, a knight of the garter who ought to know how to behave better, who has said things about our campaign and then responds by using the most dishonest figure from their campaign about three million jobs...
We have an extraordinary attack, a hypocritical attack using dodgy figures of his own and it’s all to do with his bitterness over his failings that came from the Exchange Rate Mechanism that tarnished his whole prime ministership.
He is the man who took us into the Exchange Rate Mechanism, destroyed hundreds of thousands of jobs, had people evicted from their homes and led to the destruction of businesses for the sake of his failed European policy.
And now he says things that are both hypocritical and untrue in his attack on Boris. And how magnanimous Boris was in saying we should rise above it; well, I’m going to sling the mud straight back at Sir John Major, a knight of the garter who ought to know how to behave better, who has said things about our campaign and then responds by using the most dishonest figure from their campaign about three million jobs...
We have an extraordinary attack, a hypocritical attack using dodgy figures of his own and it’s all to do with his bitterness over his failings that came from the Exchange Rate Mechanism that tarnished his whole prime ministership.
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
Mario149 said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
Esseesse said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
If a vote for Leave happens, it makes sense to let parliament sort the details out thereafter. This is what we're voting for primarily IMO after all (this is the way we self govern). To a point.
I suspect, however, that the Remain/Leave split of MPs will count for nothing if Leave is voted for. There will be different factions appearing. I imagine Corbyn will change his tune (again) and have a strong view on some topics for example.
Equally there are some aspects to the referendum that the government will need to tread very, very carefully with. Immigration being a key one for better or for worse.
I can't see playing fast and loose will be a good strategy.
I suspect, however, that the Remain/Leave split of MPs will count for nothing if Leave is voted for. There will be different factions appearing. I imagine Corbyn will change his tune (again) and have a strong view on some topics for example.
Equally there are some aspects to the referendum that the government will need to tread very, very carefully with. Immigration being a key one for better or for worse.
I can't see playing fast and loose will be a good strategy.
Mario149 said:
Esseesse said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
irocfan said:
Mario149 said:
So how exactly would the EU, our arch nemesis it seems, stop us?
OK - poor choice of words... THE EU through its puppets might have been a better thing to sayhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendu...
Take a look at what CMD has said throughout the Remain campaign, totally barking, and the disinformation in George's dodgy dossier.
Not forgetting Corbyn's U-turn after years of euroscepticism. He voted against the EEC in 1975 and against Maastricht which converted the EEC into the EU.
One comment says it all: 'No-one really believes his private opinion has changed.'
Maybe he had a dream and saw his name plate on the door of Kinnock's old office, ready for when he loses the 2020 general election and takes his place at the trough.
If he gets that far.
Osborne is doing his boss's bidding while awaiting a shoo-in to the PM's job. The PM is acting crazy enough to make people think he's worried more about his legacy than the future of the UK.
Self-interest and Party interest, that's the political problem and why the electorate is far better placed to decide (though referenda aren't binding as myself and others have pointed out).
The result is still in the balance - that said, the problem for Remain isn't that the public doesn't understand, the problem is that they/we understand only too well.
One comment says it all: 'No-one really believes his private opinion has changed.'
Maybe he had a dream and saw his name plate on the door of Kinnock's old office, ready for when he loses the 2020 general election and takes his place at the trough.
If he gets that far.
Osborne is doing his boss's bidding while awaiting a shoo-in to the PM's job. The PM is acting crazy enough to make people think he's worried more about his legacy than the future of the UK.
Self-interest and Party interest, that's the political problem and why the electorate is far better placed to decide (though referenda aren't binding as myself and others have pointed out).
The result is still in the balance - that said, the problem for Remain isn't that the public doesn't understand, the problem is that they/we understand only too well.
Mario149 said:
Agreed. I can see why we're having a referendum, but in general there's a very good reason for not letting the public make decisions such as this as by and large the average person is not equipped with the knowledge to come to a sensible answer.
and you think that MP's are? Mhairi Black is better placed than you to decide what is best for the country? TBH chap your sentence above strikes me as being exactly what dictators tell themselves...Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff