Free Marine A

Author
Discussion

eatcustard

1,003 posts

128 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
There's the big flaw, you're asking what a civvie would compared to a trained soldier.

If you flick back through this thread, you'll see what serving and ex-serving members think, and they tend to disagree with you.
A soldier is still human and can still flip, no ifs no buts it happens.

Pebbles167

3,454 posts

153 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
As a trained soldier he should have known better, and has no one to blame but himself for his predicament. I was angry as hell when I saw this on the news.

Using him as a scapegoat? No. Using him as an example? Definitely.

The guy he shot was not a threat, and it was no mercy killing. He shot the guy because he is a sadistic little st.

EDIT: In actuality i do feel a small amount of pity for him. For whatever reason he obviously thought it was a good idea at the time. That said, hes complaining when he should be just shutting up and serving his time. If he does well he'll make parole and be out within 10 years.

Edited by Pebbles167 on Friday 11th September 16:38

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

185 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
He broke the trust placed in him as a SNCO.

He commited cold blooded murder in contravention of section 42 of the Armed Forces Act 2006.

And to cap it all he was stupid enough to do so whilst he was being recorded.

He deserves everything he got. I have absolutely no sympathy.



Edited by Ginetta G15 Girl on Friday 11th September 16:50

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
There have been many videos shown of Apaches machine-gunning the enemy, the enemy taking direct hits and crawling, obviously very badly wounded, and the Apache machine-gunning them again. What's the difference?


Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
and any marine who quotes Hamlet on the battlefield has got to be a winner.

Although I suspect he has of late lost all his mirth, due to the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

185 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
There What's the difference?
The difference is that the Apache targets had not been taken prisoner.

In the Marines' case the enemy had been taken prisoner.



98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
eatcustard said:
TheEnd said:
There's the big flaw, you're asking what a civvie would compared to a trained soldier.

If you flick back through this thread, you'll see what serving and ex-serving members think, and they tend to disagree with you.
A soldier is still human and can still flip, no ifs no buts it happens.
Read the transcript. He hadn't flipped, it was cold and calculated.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Cameron is obviously all for extra judicial execution, he s even all for it for UK citizens in sovereign states.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

159 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
He did the wrong thing, got caught and should be punished. If something was held back from the trial though then that should be looked at as everyone deserves a fair trial. It's one of the things we fight for ffs.
I can only see more of his mental state being taken into account though and the charge moved to manslaughter or something.

andy_s

19,403 posts

260 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
98elise said:
Read the transcript. He hadn't flipped, it was cold and calculated.
That's 'flipped'. Read up on PTSD stuff, it's not necessarily manifested in such obvious ways.

98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
andy_s said:
98elise said:
Read the transcript. He hadn't flipped, it was cold and calculated.
That's 'flipped'. Read up on PTSD stuff, it's not necessarily manifested in such obvious ways.
Has he claimed he was suffering from PTSD?

He has claimed he thought the bloke was already dead, or that it was a split second decision. Thats completely at odds with the camera evidence.

TorqueVR

1,838 posts

200 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
I have sympathy for him.

My son on the other hand who's a serving soldier (who's done Afghanistan and come back with some unpleasant memories) has none whatsoever. He feels that he massively let the side down and has given other soldiers a bad reputation.

So I'm most likely misguided.




EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

136 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
98elise said:
andy_s said:
98elise said:
Read the transcript. He hadn't flipped, it was cold and calculated.
That's 'flipped'. Read up on PTSD stuff, it's not necessarily manifested in such obvious ways.
Has he claimed he was suffering from PTSD?

He has claimed he thought the bloke was already dead, or that it was a split second decision. Thats completely at odds with the camera evidence.
Indeed, it looks like the case for the defence tactic is a case of "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks". So one excuse is trotted out even though it undermines the others, or is contradicted by prior evidence.

Ali G

3,526 posts

283 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Collateral damage, allegedly.

And who ever wishes further military action against ISIS (I hate the term ISIS - conjours up visions of of something rather decent), ISIL, will need to sanction unsanitary actions.


andy_s

19,403 posts

260 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
EskimoArapaho said:
Indeed, it looks like the case for the defence tactic is a case of "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks". So one excuse is trotted out even though it undermines the others, or is contradicted by prior evidence.
Presumptuous.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

159 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
The "thought he was already dead line is rediculous". If the solicitor wasn't so adamant he would get off he would have concentrated on the mental states and accepted a manslaughter charge early on instead of going not guilty.

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
andy_s said:
98elise said:
Read the transcript. He hadn't flipped, it was cold and calculated.
That's 'flipped'. Read up on PTSD stuff, it's not necessarily manifested in such obvious ways.
Dissociation is one of the most common effects of PTSD, and I guess that's what you're thinking of. However, it doesn't sound like that - he actually sounds rather jocular to me in the recording.

While the stress of being in combat for a long time is certainly a driver, this still feels to me like a failure of character more than anything else - how many other soldiers acted in this way during that war?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
rscott said:
So you'd be perfectly happy if the situation was reversed - with a dying British soldier and a Taliban fighter shot him?
Which, as we all know, is exactly what would happen. So why are we so exercised when it happens the other way around?

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

159 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
Which, as we all know, is exactly what would happen. So why are we so exercised when it happens the other way around?
Because we shouldn't lower ourselves to their level. There are rules and regulations and conventions. Many people died to bring around all of these and we are just supposed to throw them away on a whim.

How hard is it to realise there are things you cannot do and getting caught doing them has consequences.

dai1983

2,914 posts

150 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
He did the wrong thing, got caught and should be punished. If something was held back from the trial though then that should be looked at as everyone deserves a fair trial. It's one of the things we fight for ffs.
Pretty much this really.

By the way WTF is a "snackbar"?