Facebook pay no Corporation Tax AGAIN

Facebook pay no Corporation Tax AGAIN

Author
Discussion

NicD

3,281 posts

258 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
waterwonder said:
NicD said:
Manufacturing, or assembly?
Both by most definitions but if you want to cite your definition then I'll answer again.
Time shifting, you have already defined 'pedantic', above

BGARK

5,494 posts

247 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
CamMoreRon said:
My degree was in flange management
Is this your wife?

http://www.break.com/video/judge-judy-destroys-mot...

waterwonder

995 posts

177 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
NicD said:
Time shifting, you have already defined 'pedantic', above
Alas I've been beaten by experience.


mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
The ugly traits of socialist envy and ignorance rise from the mire again.

Tax concessions are in place for a reason and using them to minimise tax liabilities is not a cause for finger pointing and tantrums.

Unless your name is Russell Bland.


hidetheelephants

24,483 posts

194 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
waterwonder said:
NicD said:
seems pretty simple - manufacturing from raw materials (or do you need a definition of this also) versus assembly of already manufactured components.

In fact, as mentioned above the important metric is perhaps, the number of people employed locally plus value of taxable UK income declared.


No need to define raw materials unless you want to be pointlessly pedantic about that also.

CamMoreRon said:
Manufacturing by robot, assembly by robot, supervision by (very small amount of) people.
Not sure I agree, a volume car plant employes about 4000 people as a massive approximation. Granted less than it used to however the world moves on.

If we are assembling cars here then you need suppliers, who also employee people and pay tax and so on.

It all comes back to the same point. As a country the UK has relatively low taxes, a key reason for this is to attract investment.
+1 Having worked briefly in a couple of car assembly plants and seen others on the telly box, they're chock full of people screwing cars together, mostly by hand. The robots only get to do the really tedious/hazardous stuff like spot welding and painting.

NicD

3,281 posts

258 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
waterwonder said:
NicD said:
Time shifting, you have already defined 'pedantic', above
Alas I've been beaten by experience.
Agreed, but not in the way you allude to.

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
All this crap about multi-nationals where whining British politicians carp on about how they pay no UK tax.

They do pay tax. Often in the US. just not to HMRC.
Where they can pay tax in a lower tax environment, like the Netherlands or Ireland, can you blame them for doing so?
If the carping whiny-arsed hand wringing lying thieving MPs want the multi-nationals' money they can do two things about it:
COMPETE for their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals WANT to pay tax in rather than some other country.
CHANGE THE LAW so they have to pay more tax here

bhing about companies following the letter of the law strikes me as completely fking dumb when you have the power to change laws in your favour. There is no suggestion that Facebook or Google have acted illegally in any way.

Bah.


NicD

3,281 posts

258 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Don said:
All this crap about multi-nationals where whining British politicians carp on about how they pay no UK tax.

They do pay tax. Often in the US. just not to HMRC.
Where they can pay tax in a lower tax environment, like the Netherlands or Ireland, can you blame them for doing so?
If the carping whiny-arsed hand wringing lying thieving MPs want the multi-nationals' money they can do two things about it:
COMPETE for their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals WANT to pay tax in rather than some other country.
CHANGE THE LAW so they have to pay more tax here

bhing about companies following the letter of the law strikes me as completely fking dumb when you have the power to change laws in your favour. There is no suggestion that Facebook or Google have acted illegally in any way.

Bah.
While I agree with some of this, you are missing the point

WE as customers or voters are entitled to feel fked off by the antics of these multinational corporations and tax haven countries, no matter that it is 'only' a moral rather than legal crime.

And yes, I am disgusted by the 'pork barrel' way our arcane tax laws and rules have evolved, though I am strongly for low taxes and small government.
I am NOT in favour of low tax for the unscrupulous and high tax for the middle workers

turbobloke

104,025 posts

261 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
NicD said:
Don said:
All this crap about multi-nationals where whining British politicians carp on about how they pay no UK tax.

They do pay tax. Often in the US. just not to HMRC.
Where they can pay tax in a lower tax environment, like the Netherlands or Ireland, can you blame them for doing so?
If the carping whiny-arsed hand wringing lying thieving MPs want the multi-nationals' money they can do two things about it:
COMPETE for their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals WANT to pay tax in rather than some other country.
CHANGE THE LAW so they have to pay more tax here

bhing about companies following the letter of the law strikes me as completely fking dumb when you have the power to change laws in your favour. There is no suggestion that Facebook or Google have acted illegally in any way.

Bah.
While I agree with some of this, you are missing the point

WE as customers or voters are entitled to feel fked off by the antics of these multinational corporations and tax haven countries, no matter that it is 'only' a moral rather than legal crime.
Not that there's any such thing as a moral crime! Taxes aren't a moral issue anyway, there's a legal obligation to pay what's due.

Certainly anyone can hold whatever opinion they wish but when a multinational that can operate anywhere locates some of its business in a particular country, the appropriate reaction is gratitude. If a business owner can run their business e.g. a web-based business from anywhere, that's what they'll do. As Don said we should be competing for their presence and then their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals want to pay tax in rather than some other country, and be pleased when they locate part of their enterprise here.


Sir Humphrey

387 posts

124 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
If you don't approve of Facebook/Starbucks/Google/Amazon/Primark/whoever's working conditions or tax system or whatever else, don't use their services. They will soon get the hint and move elsewhere.

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Both Google and Facebook and all the other multinationals that operate here do pay UK taxes.

They pay some VAT. Its a sales tax and not based on profits. So they can't avoid it.
Their employees who work in the UK pay UK income tax. They can't avoid it.
Their employees who have jobs and, perhaps, would not otherwise are paying taxes HMRC would not otherwise get.
They have to pay business rates on premises whether they rent or buy. They can't avoid it.

So the thing they're not paying is corporation tax. Because that is tax on profit declared in the UK.
They have legal means by which to declare profit in any of the countries they operate in. Is it any wonder they choose the cheaper tax regimes in which to declare profit? Not at all. It's what any rational, thinking person or corporate manager would do.

Tax is not charity. It's tax. You have a moral obligation to pay the exact amount due under the law. Not a penny more or less. And the whiny arsed MPs cheesed off about it have all the moral high ground of Al Capone.

turbobloke

104,025 posts

261 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Don said:
So the thing they're not paying is corporation tax. Because that is tax on profit declared in the UK. They have legal means by which to declare profit in any of the countries they operate in. Is it any wonder they choose the cheaper tax regimes in which to declare profit? Not at all. It's what any rational, thinking person or corporate manager would do.
When you mentioned the position of a rational thinking person, this comment from Guido's blog came to mind.

MisterNed said:
We already know that labour voters do not inhabit rational, fact based reality at all, but in an emotion based fantasy world made up of whatever the hell they want to believe in at the time.
sonar

Don said:
You have a moral obligation to pay the exact amount due under the law. Not a penny more or less.
Some may see it like that, but all have a legal obligation smile

Don said:
And the whiny arsed MPs cheesed off about it have all the moral high ground of Al Capone.
Margaret Hodge and Al Capone, an interesting comparison.

CamMoreRon

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

126 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
sidicks said:
BGARK said:
CamMoreRon said:
If you want to talk engineering
What type of engineering are you involved in?
My guess would be Lego, but obviously not the technical stuff!
biggrin
I'll have you know I was pretty handy with Lego!

Not quite as handy as this, mind..


CamMoreRon

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

126 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
The ugly traits of socialist envy and ignorance rise from the mire again..
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..

turbobloke

104,025 posts

261 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
CamMoreRon said:
mybrainhurts said:
The ugly traits of socialist envy and ignorance rise from the mire again..
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..
...it's not that one.

Sir Humphrey

387 posts

124 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
CamMoreRon said:
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..
What are the beneficial traits of socialism then?

98elise

26,646 posts

162 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
CamMoreRon said:
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..
What are the beneficial traits of socialism then?
The magic money tree.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
CamMoreRon said:
mybrainhurts said:
The ugly traits of socialist envy and ignorance rise from the mire again..
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..
...it's not that one.
Boom. Next it'll be finishing with "Seriously".... hehe

CamMoreRon

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

126 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Sir Humphrey said:
CamMoreRon said:
If there was ever a sentence that showed true ignorance..
What are the beneficial traits of socialism then?
And that's my point.. the assumption that anyone who isn't a Tory is advocating Socialism.

NicD

3,281 posts

258 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
NicD said:
Don said:
All this crap about multi-nationals where whining British politicians carp on about how they pay no UK tax.

They do pay tax. Often in the US. just not to HMRC.
Where they can pay tax in a lower tax environment, like the Netherlands or Ireland, can you blame them for doing so?
If the carping whiny-arsed hand wringing lying thieving MPs want the multi-nationals' money they can do two things about it:
COMPETE for their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals WANT to pay tax in rather than some other country.
CHANGE THE LAW so they have to pay more tax here

bhing about companies following the letter of the law strikes me as completely fking dumb when you have the power to change laws in your favour. There is no suggestion that Facebook or Google have acted illegally in any way.

Bah.
While I agree with some of this, you are missing the point

WE as customers or voters are entitled to feel fked off by the antics of these multinational corporations and tax haven countries, no matter that it is 'only' a moral rather than legal crime.
Not that there's any such thing as a moral crime! Taxes aren't a moral issue anyway, there's a legal obligation to pay what's due.

Certainly anyone can hold whatever opinion they wish but when a multinational that can operate anywhere locates some of its business in a particular country, the appropriate reaction is gratitude. If a business owner can run their business e.g. a web-based business from anywhere, that's what they'll do. As Don said we should be competing for their presence and then their tax by running a low tax regime multi-nationals want to pay tax in rather than some other country, and be pleased when they locate part of their enterprise here.
You can be 'grateful' if you like, but you are not thinking clearly. The business in question is NOT located here. The revenues are earned here from UK customers, but by financial engineering, the true profits are not recognised nor taxed here.
You can say this is a great thing if you like, but if extended to the whole economy, the results would be disastrous.

All companies that earn profit here should pay the appropriate tax here. That does not happen with these spiv multinats that employ transfer pricing and double Irish or double Luxembourg or double Netherlands or whatever to shield the true profit.

As I said,our crooked and stupid rulers allow this to happen, but it doesn't make it right.