House of Lords to be replaced
Discussion
Looking at the various manifestos the SNP and the Lib Dems have joined Labour and are also campaigning to abolish the HOL as we know it.
On the plus side we will get rid of the paedophiles and convicted criminals however with an elected HOL we'll probably end up losing some of the independence that the House has because it will undoubtedly become a lot more party political when it becomes fully elected.
On the plus side we will get rid of the paedophiles and convicted criminals however with an elected HOL we'll probably end up losing some of the independence that the House has because it will undoubtedly become a lot more party political when it becomes fully elected.
BlackLabel said:
Looking at the various manifestos the SNP and the Lib Dems have joined Labour and are also campaigning to abolish the HOL as we know it.
On the plus side we will get rid of the paedophiles and convicted criminals however with an elected HOL we'll probably end up losing some of the independence that the House has because it will undoubtedly become a lot more party political when it becomes fully elected.
So paedophiles and convicted criminals or career politiciansOn the plus side we will get rid of the paedophiles and convicted criminals however with an elected HOL we'll probably end up losing some of the independence that the House has because it will undoubtedly become a lot more party political when it becomes fully elected.
The only way I can bring myself to approve of an elected 2nd chamber is if:
One concern I have is how do you encourage the likes of Lord Winston to stand for election? I believe subject specialists like him would run a mile.
- They serve a fixed term then go back to whatever they did before. perhaps 6-8 years.
- No party affiliation of any kind, definitely no ex-MPs.
- Candidates selected at open primaries to get rid of chaff.
- Perhaps subject specialists nominated by professional bodies, but even that has problems.
One concern I have is how do you encourage the likes of Lord Winston to stand for election? I believe subject specialists like him would run a mile.
Derek Smith said:
What we need is a function for the HoL. At the moment it doesn't have one.
The HOL has the power to veto an Act of self-perpetuation by a majority government. I'd consider this quite important and a very good reason to not have an elected upper chamber.Its further purpose is to suggest change & improvement to hastily written (kneejerk) legislation; as someone else put it, acting as the brakes.
It should be noted that most civilised countries have a bicameral government & that for all its faults our system is admired & envied by many others throughout the world.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff