Veteran assaulted on way to Remebrance Ceremony
Discussion
zuby84 said:
NicD said:
I must have missed some posts
who is this,and why?
Oh, he's probably referring to the racist abuse and slander-esque comments I start receiving from some of our esteemed friends when I sometimes introduce a little bit of objectivity into things. This has resulted in the thread being locked and then they blame me because I don't tow the "all Muslims are evil/bad/naughty" line and therefore I get accused of "diverting the thread" [away from Muslim bashing]. Even had a bit of a stalker at one point. All fun and games here.who is this,and why?
All this from the man who thought it amusing about Lee Rigby being killed ?
Countdown said:
zuby84 said:
Muntu said:
It may well be, but that is not necessarily relevant on this thread. this started off as a Muslim bashing thread - can we not keep it on topic guys? Feel free to start a fresh thread about it, I'd probably contribute to it
Corrected it for you.http://www.keighleynews.co.uk/news/11602285.Keighl...hijackinghis_robbery_ordeal/?action=complain&cid=13402096
Must be quite upsetting for some on here...
What you have quoted - supposedly from me, was a figment of your mate Zuby's imagination, not something that I wrote
Zuby, if you could refrain from doing that in future, that would be nice.
Countdown said:
Muntu said:
Run it past the BNP types then?
Well, that's kind of what I have done, by posting it on here.You can normally tell who they are, they'll be getting all upset and defensive.....
I'm not their type, if you get my drift
yes, this is quite funny, this gentleman thinks it is equally bad for an elderly ex soldier to be robbed of his medals and have his beret and poppy stripped by a gang of young thugs as a political party reprinting the news article.
He (the chap below) should get a grip
Mohammed Rafiq Sehgal, president of Bradford Council for Mosques, said: "The attack on a veteran attending the remembrance is a disgraceful act of cowardliness by the unthinking morons.
"We find the exploitation of the misfortunes of the veteran by the BNP for its racist agenda equally despicable and insensitive."
He (the chap below) should get a grip
Mohammed Rafiq Sehgal, president of Bradford Council for Mosques, said: "The attack on a veteran attending the remembrance is a disgraceful act of cowardliness by the unthinking morons.
"We find the exploitation of the misfortunes of the veteran by the BNP for its racist agenda equally despicable and insensitive."
Muntu said:
e21Mark said:
Muntu said:
Sway said:
AND DOES NOT INCLUDE HAVING MEDIEVAL, DIVISIVE AND IGNORANT VIEWS LIKE YOURS)...
Isn't that what the koran is cover to cover full of?Awesome use of the Caps Lock functionality on your keyboard BTW
Muntu said:
Countdown said:
Muntu said:
Run it past the BNP types then?
Well, that's kind of what I have done, by posting it on here.You can normally tell who they are, they'll be getting all upset and defensive.....
I'm not their type, if you get my drift
e21Mark said:
Mentioning the fact, that their are ignorant, bigoted views associated with religions other than Islam isn't relevant? Erm' OK then.
Indeed. It's like discussing the merits or otherwise of Granny Smith Apples, then somebody pipes up "Ecuadorian bananas are odd tasting" - that may well be the case, but not really germane to the current discussion.e21Mark said:
Muntu said:
e21Mark said:
Muntu said:
Sway said:
AND DOES NOT INCLUDE HAVING MEDIEVAL, DIVISIVE AND IGNORANT VIEWS LIKE YOURS)...
Isn't that what the koran is cover to cover full of?Awesome use of the Caps Lock functionality on your keyboard BTW
XJ Flyer said:
e21Mark said:
Muntu said:
e21Mark said:
Muntu said:
Sway said:
AND DOES NOT INCLUDE HAVING MEDIEVAL, DIVISIVE AND IGNORANT VIEWS LIKE YOURS)...
Isn't that what the koran is cover to cover full of?Awesome use of the Caps Lock functionality on your keyboard BTW
XJ Flyer said:
Reverse our immigration policy retrospectively since 1946 through a process of repatriation.The obvious result of which would be all the usual socialist and cheap labour agenda suspects trying to paint that idea as the same thing as genocide.
Go further, reverse it from 400 AD. Most of he country will have to ps off abroad then. Why? Is it those that are the problem? I also dont agree that if we've been here 1600 years - by your reckoning- we should still be classed as immigrants. I don't hear that levelled at any other population around the world. Maybe you shouldn't be so jealous of our history.
KareemK said:
Go further, reverse it from 400 AD. Most of he country will have to ps off abroad then.
Spanglepants said:
Why? Is it those that are the problem? I also dont agree that if we've been here 1600 years - by your reckoning- we should still be classed as immigrants. I don't hear that levelled at any other population around the world. Maybe you shouldn't be so jealous of our history.
"Jealous of OUR history" I dont know where to even start KareemK said:
Go further, reverse it from 400 AD. Most of he country will have to ps off abroad then.
Tell me, What am I then?
Oh, and you can bet your last dollar that the indiginous Celts or Britons of the time would likely have called your ancestors 'immigrants' (or worse) - unless you're of that lineage yourself.
So what are you then? Roman, norman, dane, saxon, angle, german, french, jewish?
This is a country made from the DNA of immigrants over the last 2,000 years.
So back to my original point, you're advocating repatriating all of those who've arrived in he last 46 years, what about the kids born here? Where shall we send them?
KareemK said:
Spanglepants said:
Why? Is it those that are the problem? I also dont agree that if we've been here 1600 years - by your reckoning- we should still be classed as immigrants. I don't hear that levelled at any other population around the world. Maybe you shouldn't be so jealous of our history.
"Jealous of OUR history" I dont know where to even start KareemK said:
Go further, reverse it from 400 AD. Most of he country will have to ps off abroad then.
Tell me, What am I then?
Oh, and you can bet your last dollar that the indiginous Celts or Britons of the time would likely have called your ancestors 'immigrants' (or worse) - unless you're of that lineage yourself.
So what are you then? Roman, norman, dane, saxon, angle, german, french, jewish?
This is a country made from the DNA of immigrants over the last 2,000 years.
So back to my original point, you're advocating repatriating all of those who've arrived in he last 46 years, what about the kids born here? Where shall we send them?
KareemK said:
Spanglepants said:
Why? Is it those that are the problem? I also dont agree that if we've been here 1600 years - by your reckoning- we should still be classed as immigrants. I don't hear that levelled at any other population around the world. Maybe you shouldn't be so jealous of our history.
"Jealous of OUR history" I dont know where to even start KareemK said:
Go further, reverse it from 400 AD. Most of he country will have to ps off abroad then.
Its ok, don't trouble yourself.
Tell me, What am I then?
Whats your ancestry then?
Oh, and you can bet your last dollar that the indiginous Celts or Britons of the time would likely have called your ancestors 'immigrants' (or worse) - unless you're of that lineage yourself.
So what are you then? Roman, norman, dane, saxon, angle, german, french, jewish?
This is a country made from the DNA of immigrants over the last 2,000 years.
Dont tell me, we're mongrels.
So back to my original point, you're advocating repatriating all of those who've arrived in he last 46 years, what about the kids born here? Where shall we send them?
KareemK said:
"Jealous of OUR history" I dont know where to even start
Tell me, What am I then?
Oh, and you can bet your last dollar that the indiginous Celts or Britons of the time would likely have called your ancestors 'immigrants' (or worse) - unless you're of that lineage yourself.
So what are you then? Roman, norman, dane, saxon, angle, german, french, jewish?
This is a country made from the DNA of immigrants over the last 2,000 years.
So back to my original point, you're advocating repatriating all of those who've arrived in he last 46 years, what about the kids born here? Where shall we send them?
Or in other words typical cheap labour/socialist immigration rhetoric which uses the long gone ethnic history of the country to make the case that we have to maintain an open door immigration policy for ever more.Tell me, What am I then?
Oh, and you can bet your last dollar that the indiginous Celts or Britons of the time would likely have called your ancestors 'immigrants' (or worse) - unless you're of that lineage yourself.
So what are you then? Roman, norman, dane, saxon, angle, german, french, jewish?
This is a country made from the DNA of immigrants over the last 2,000 years.
So back to my original point, you're advocating repatriating all of those who've arrived in he last 46 years, what about the kids born here? Where shall we send them?
Spanglepants said:
No, nowhere did i say i wanted anyone repatriated. It was a reply to your smug comment on most of the country have to ps off abroad.
You still haven't answered my qustion Mr Presumptious, what am I?You said I was jealous of YOUR history.
As for smug well the truth often bites and again you didn't answer the point.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff