Why the UKIP will never work....

Why the UKIP will never work....

Author
Discussion

BGARK

5,493 posts

245 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
Please explain why one hundred years ago - when there were very few black people in the UK - there was so much demand for 'minstrel music' that white people used to 'black up'.
I will explain, you are wrong.


King Cnut

256 posts

112 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
BGARK said:
King said:
Please explain why one hundred years ago - when there were very few black people in the UK - there was so much demand for 'minstrel music' that white people used to 'black up'.
I will explain, you are wrong.
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?

steveT350C

6,728 posts

160 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
steveT350C said:
black rolleyes

this should keep you amused http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2850927/...

Edited by steveT350C on Friday 28th November 16:02
Do you disapprove of people sunbathing as well?
You were the one who started the whole black thing. Why?

NicD

3,281 posts

256 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
what part of that don't YOU understand?

King Cnut

256 posts

112 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
steveT350C said:
You were the one who started the whole black thing. Why?
Sorry, do you have a problem talking about black people?

steveT350C

6,728 posts

160 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
steveT350C said:
You were the one who started the whole black thing. Why?
Sorry, do you have a problem talking about black people?
The conversation is about levels of immigration and nothing to do with race or colour IMO.

You must think being black is relevant, why?

Edited by steveT350C on Friday 28th November 19:30

King Cnut

256 posts

112 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
NicD said:
King said:
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
what part of that don't YOU understand?
I don't know, I'm all ears though.

NicD

3,281 posts

256 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
NicD said:
King said:
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
what part of that don't YOU understand?
I don't know, I'm all ears though.
YOU asked for an explanation. Try to keep up with yourself.

King Cnut

256 posts

112 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
NicD said:
King said:
NicD said:
King said:
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
what part of that don't YOU understand?
I don't know, I'm all ears though.
YOU asked for an explanation. Try to keep up with yourself.
Well yes, I did ask for an explanation but I didn't ask you for an explanation. Still, if seeing as you're so interested in the subject, I was trying to work out what XJ Flyer meant when he said -
XJ Flyer said:
The point being that socialist confusion which thinks that the definition of the word 'culture',in the case of immigration policy, is something different from the definition of the word 'society'.In which case as I've said multi cultural 'also' means multi societal.Which then just leaves the question of how big and influential do we allow those foreign immigrant cultures/societies to grow.Not lets let in as many as who wish to come here and then integrate them into the indigenous culture/society.That is the issue which the pro immigration socialist/cheap labour alliance needs to get its head around.

The logical conclusion of which,as I've shown previously,is the correct policy which the US government decided to impose in regards to the immigration issue with the Johnson-Reed Immigration Act of 1924 which recognised and understood all of those issues.

Unlike the present failed PC pro immigration agenda which just keeps adding more and more to the numbers based on the flawed ideology that it is all about 'integration'.
Now you'll have to forgive me here but I find XJ hard to understand, mainly because he doesn't accept standard definitions of words - he says so himself. Anyway, one interpretation of what he said might mean that he doesn't like people from different societies mixing. It's hard to tell because I haven't a clue exactly what he means by 'society'. But anyway, one interpretation of not liking societies mixing is that he doesn't like the Ferrari Club mixing with the Fiat Club, another interpretation might be that he doesn't like black people mixing with white people. You can't tell because whatever his definition of society is it isn't clear. Rather than ask him his definition of society I decided it'd be easier to ask an exemplary question because I didn't want to get more of his internal dialogue. And I think that's the point when you saw the word black and started acting like a startled social worker from Lambeth.

Seeing as you're so interested, maybe you'd like to explain what he meant? One thing is for sure, whatever you think he said, he'll disagree with you.

rs1952

5,247 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
Sweyn Forkbeard's son said:
Seeing as you're so interested, maybe you'd like to explain what he meant? One thing is for sure, whatever you think he said, he'll disagree with you.
You've not been around here long, but I see you're getting the measure of some posters wink

ETA - no bloody machine auto-censors my posts unless I want it to wink

mrdemon

21,146 posts

264 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
steveT350C said:
You were the one who started the whole black thing. Why?
Black Friday !

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

129 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
BGARK said:
King said:
Please explain why one hundred years ago - when there were very few black people in the UK - there was so much demand for 'minstrel music' that white people used to 'black up'.
I will explain, you are wrong.
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
I could but that would mean getting involved in the argument as to why it is seen as ok for one ethnic group to apply 'choices' based on ethnicity.But not another in the form of wanting to remove that choice on the same basis as in the case of the general situation which often applies in the case of the Latin,Jewish and Asian cultures just as in the case of what remains of anti integrationist US.


Edited by XJ Flyer on Friday 28th November 23:09

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

129 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
King said:
NicD said:
King said:
NicD said:
King said:
Will you also explain why people from different races seem to enjoy having sex together?
what part of that don't YOU understand?
I don't know, I'm all ears though.
YOU asked for an explanation. Try to keep up with yourself.
Well yes, I did ask for an explanation but I didn't ask you for an explanation. Still, if seeing as you're so interested in the subject, I was trying to work out what XJ Flyer meant when he said -
XJ Flyer said:
The point being that socialist confusion which thinks that the definition of the word 'culture',in the case of immigration policy, is something different from the definition of the word 'society'.In which case as I've said multi cultural 'also' means multi societal.Which then just leaves the question of how big and influential do we allow those foreign immigrant cultures/societies to grow.Not lets let in as many as who wish to come here and then integrate them into the indigenous culture/society.That is the issue which the pro immigration socialist/cheap labour alliance needs to get its head around.

The logical conclusion of which,as I've shown previously,is the correct policy which the US government decided to impose in regards to the immigration issue with the Johnson-Reed Immigration Act of 1924 which recognised and understood all of those issues.

Unlike the present failed PC pro immigration agenda which just keeps adding more and more to the numbers based on the flawed ideology that it is all about 'integration'.
Now you'll have to forgive me here but I find XJ hard to understand, mainly because he doesn't accept standard definitions of words - he says so himself. Anyway, one interpretation of what he said might mean that he doesn't like people from different societies mixing. It's hard to tell because I haven't a clue exactly what he means by 'society'. But anyway, one interpretation of not liking societies mixing is that he doesn't like the Ferrari Club mixing with the Fiat Club, another interpretation might be that he doesn't like black people mixing with white people. You can't tell because whatever his definition of society is it isn't clear. Rather than ask him his definition of society I decided it'd be easier to ask an exemplary question because I didn't want to get more of his internal dialogue. And I think that's the point when you saw the word black and started acting like a startled social worker from Lambeth.

Seeing as you're so interested, maybe you'd like to explain what he meant? One thing is for sure, whatever you think he said, he'll disagree with you.
Why would referring to the example of the 'issues' which applied between the Italian and Irish communities in New York and the different factions in the former Yugoslavia have anything particularly and specifically to do with colour.The issues in American society and to an extent here show that colour issues are mostly all in the minds of the black community.IE they seem to be the ones who keep referring to the 'issues' of 'white' policing of 'black' communities.Which the idea of segregation would of course fix.

As for the issue of not accepting the socialist definition of 'culture',because it conveniently counts out 'society' as being a part of that definition,I'd suggest that says more about the socialist agenda than mine.

Edited by XJ Flyer on Friday 28th November 23:00


Edited by XJ Flyer on Friday 28th November 23:02


Edited by XJ Flyer on Friday 28th November 23:19

Foppo

2,344 posts

123 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
I wonder how the yanks would have reacted if a twelve year old white kid was shot by two black cops.

Or when a jury had to decide about a case like the 18 year old kid who got shot was white where all black.

Don't blame it on all the blacks they have their backs against the wall.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

129 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
Foppo said:
I wonder how the yanks would have reacted if a twelve year old white kid was shot by two black cops.

Or when a jury had to decide about a case like the 18 year old kid who got shot was white where all black.

Don't blame it on all the blacks they have their backs against the wall.
More socialist propaganda.The colour issue was all 'supposed' to be done and over with in modern day America in which case it wouldn't make any difference to anyone what colour the law or the shot person was.But obviously,conveniently,not when it suits the issue of the police of whatever colour doing there job.

In this case the answer would obviously be I wonder what would have happened in the case of a black person of whatever age waving a gun getting shot by a black copper.Let me guess you'll now say it would never happen because a black copper would never open fire on his own race.IE typical socialist reverse racism.

vonuber

17,868 posts

164 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
Funny really. If UKIP were in power 60 years ago I wouldn't be alive.

CamMoreRon

1,237 posts

124 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
XJ Flyer said:
The issues in American society and to an extent here show that colour issues are mostly all in the minds of the black community.IE they seem to be the ones who keep referring to the 'issues' of 'white' policing of 'black' communities.Which the idea of segregation would of course fix.
Why is a segregated society with black people / black police and white people / white police the option you choose, rather than.. I dunno.. getting some of the apalling racists out of the police force?

There's a good documentary on Netflix called The House I Live In. You should watch it.

s2art

18,937 posts

252 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
vonuber said:
Funny really. If UKIP were in power 60 years ago I wouldn't be alive.
Given the butterfly effect, very few people currently existing, aged less than 60 years minus approx 9 months, would be alive either. So dont feel special.

vonuber

17,868 posts

164 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
s2art said:
Given the butterfly effect, very few people currently existing, aged less than 60 years minus approx 9 months, would be alive either. So dont feel special.
My birth would have been directly affected by that lovely parties policies, regardless of anything else.

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

129 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
CamMoreRon said:
XJ Flyer said:
The issues in American society and to an extent here show that colour issues are mostly all in the minds of the black community.IE they seem to be the ones who keep referring to the 'issues' of 'white' policing of 'black' communities.Which the idea of segregation would of course fix.
Why is a segregated society with black people / black police and white people / white police the option you choose, rather than.. I dunno.. getting some of the apalling racists out of the police force?

There's a good documentary on Netflix called The House I Live In. You should watch it.
I don't generally believe in all the socialist inspired integrationist propaganda and that would be part of it.


The way I see it it is the black community that is making all the issues about it being a colour motivated shooting.The kid was pointing a replica gun at people and not surprisingly,considering the society,got shot.What difference does colour make in that case.Assuming the 'black' community has 'issues' in that regard then black policing of black segretated areas is the obvious answer and sooner or later will inevitably have to be the chosen method used to deal with it.