So it's class war then...

Author
Discussion

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
turbobloke said:
rovermorris999 said:
fblm said:
How do you level the 'good' school in a middle class commuter belt with a 'bad' school next to an inner city estate?
You do the usual socialist thing and level down. It's 'fair' then.
All shall have prizes mediocrity.
Just as an aside...

My son is on the school rugby team, we played one of the local comps several months ago. We happened to win, pretty much hands down to be fair.

However there was the post match stuff on the field the usual man of the match etc. So we had best try, man of the match and players player, cheapo trophies that get passed on week to week, you know the stuff we probably all did as kids.

They had none of that but the teacher/coach did a we may have lost but we are all winners kind of speech and they all got a "participation" ribbon!!!
The International Olympics Committee are bound to take note.

When those kids follow Presclot and participate in a future Labour government (heaven help everyone else) they can attach those ribbons to their memo to the IMF begging for yet more participation.

Derek Smith

45,659 posts

248 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
Just as an aside...

My son is on the school rugby team, we played one of the local comps several months ago. We happened to win, pretty much hands down to be fair.

However there was the post match stuff on the field the usual man of the match etc. So we had best try, man of the match and players player, cheapo trophies that get passed on week to week, you know the stuff we probably all did as kids.

They had none of that but the teacher/coach did a we may have lost but we are all winners kind of speech and they all got a "participation" ribbon!!!
My lad plays rugby. He led his team out onto the hallowed turf for a cup final. 'We' beat the other side by more than one score and my lad was presented with the cup. And do you know what the leftie RFU did? They only gave the other side participation medals. That's just asking for a reduction to mediocrity.


heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
heppers75 said:
turbobloke said:
rovermorris999 said:
fblm said:
How do you level the 'good' school in a middle class commuter belt with a 'bad' school next to an inner city estate?
You do the usual socialist thing and level down. It's 'fair' then.
All shall have prizes mediocrity.
Just as an aside...

My son is on the school rugby team, we played one of the local comps several months ago. We happened to win, pretty much hands down to be fair.

However there was the post match stuff on the field the usual man of the match etc. So we had best try, man of the match and players player, cheapo trophies that get passed on week to week, you know the stuff we probably all did as kids.

They had none of that but the teacher/coach did a we may have lost but we are all winners kind of speech and they all got a "participation" ribbon!!!
The International Olympics Committee are bound to take note.

When those kids follow Presclot and participate in a future Labour government (heaven help everyone else) they can attach those ribbons to their memo to the IMF begging for yet more participation.
I swear I was not sure if I ought to laugh or cry... Myself and a couple of the other dads from our team were somewhat godsmacked at what we were seeing, we even shot a couple of glances in the direction of the parents of the other team and honestly it was clear they were pretty much ashamed of the farce in progress.

Foppo

2,344 posts

124 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Are you that happy with this lot Mr Turbo? Surprising a lad from Grimsby so anti labour.

Private schools will always give pupils a advantage.How many working people can afford twenty grand to pay for their childrens education.

NomduJour

19,106 posts

259 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Foppo said:
Private schools will always give pupils a advantage.How many working people can afford twenty grand to pay for their childrens education
Money buys opportunities, and that isn't going to change.

Derek Smith

45,659 posts

248 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
If that were how it was both judged and enacted Derek I would utterly agree with you.

That really is not, at least not what I see is being said - however I may have the wrong end of the stick.

It is certainly not however what some on here are also proposing either.
I know a little about charity status and in particular what hoops non-profit-making companies have to jump through to avoid various tax liabilities.

From what I read, that seemed to be the suggestion. That said, it was put forward by a politician and so there's nothing we can trust in what they say.

So perhaps this is a first step towards removing charity status from private schools. I don't know. However, non taxable status for small companies is hard to maintain and the conditions are strict so I see no reason why private schools should be treated lightly.

Some schools do take the mickey. Others do not. That gives an unfair advantage to those who take the mickey. It is unreasonable to expect those schools which seem to have civic responsibility to take the punishment.

Either play by the rules or else lose the concessions.


RYH64E

7,960 posts

244 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Foppo said:
How many working people can afford twenty grand to pay for their childrens education.
It's not £20k/year yet, about £12k-ish outside London for a day school, and the answer to your question would be 'Quite a few'. All of the parents I know at my boy's school are working people, myself included. Obviously not poor working people, but working people prepared to make sacrifices to pay for something they consider worthwhile.

sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
Money buys opportunities, and that isn't going to change.
How fortunate that the evidence shows that, by paying for private education, parents free up school places for those that cannot afford to pay meaning that education funds can be spread over a lower number of pupils - everyone is a winner.

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
Foppo said:
Private schools will always give pupils a advantage.How many working people can afford twenty grand to pay for their childrens education
Money buys opportunities, and that isn't going to change.
And those that can and do chose to do that will always be derided by those that cannot or do not. Be that from ideological or fiscal standpoints, it was always and shall always be thus.

My aforementioned mothers friend from the family wedding who called me "a class traitor" is as sure an indicator of that as ever there was!

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Foppo said:
Are you that happy with this lot Mr Turbo?
Which lot - PH? Sure, all pixels are equal and everyone in good odour with the mods has fair access.

Coalition? No. Their energy policy is disastrous. The LibDems are preventing necessary change in various areas while proposing idiotic things, but that's only to be expected.

Foppo said:
Surprising a lad from Grimsby so anti labour.
There are insufficient fish being landed to pin a red rosette on after Harold Wilson and his Labour chums lost the cod war and sank the port.

Foppo said:
Private schools will always give pupils a advantage.How many working people can afford twenty grand to pay for their childrens education.
The ones I know typically involve a father taking a second job and a mother taking in and managing a lodger as well as p/t work (say). That's the typical sort of thing I'm aware of as people do what they can in their individual family circumstances. I'm state school educated but have had various reasons to be in close contact with independent schools and their clients over the years.

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
heppers75 said:
If that were how it was both judged and enacted Derek I would utterly agree with you.

That really is not, at least not what I see is being said - however I may have the wrong end of the stick.

It is certainly not however what some on here are also proposing either.
I know a little about charity status and in particular what hoops non-profit-making companies have to jump through to avoid various tax liabilities.

From what I read, that seemed to be the suggestion. That said, it was put forward by a politician and so there's nothing we can trust in what they say.

So perhaps this is a first step towards removing charity status from private schools. I don't know. However, non taxable status for small companies is hard to maintain and the conditions are strict so I see no reason why private schools should be treated lightly.

Some schools do take the mickey. Others do not. That gives an unfair advantage to those who take the mickey. It is unreasonable to expect those schools which seem to have civic responsibility to take the punishment.

Either play by the rules or else lose the concessions.
I do not so I take your comments on face value.

I just think removing that status does not help wider society, even if in places it is abused. Weeding out that abuse is a good idea, but throwing out the baby with the bathwater is not, my issue is that more often than not where government approaches are concerned there seems to be a trebuchet used when a scalpel was necessary!

edh

3,498 posts

269 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
FredClogs said:
One thing I hope we can agree on, and it seems we might, is the ridiculous post code lottery attached to the education system, where people live would appear to have a far greater impact on your offspring's educational options and life chances than how much money you have and how you choose to spend it - and to that end it's clear only centralised governmental control has the ability to level the playing field (so to speak).
How do you level the 'good' school in a middle class commuter belt with a 'bad' school next to an inner city estate?
Well you could just give up....or you could try and apply the lessons from the London Challenge..

https://www.cfbt.com/en-GB/Research/Research-libra...

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/london-challeng...

I'd like to see a school system that was so good that parents thought it was ridiculous to spend extra money on private education.


turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
edh said:
fblm said:
FredClogs said:
One thing I hope we can agree on, and it seems we might, is the ridiculous post code lottery attached to the education system, where people live would appear to have a far greater impact on your offspring's educational options and life chances than how much money you have and how you choose to spend it - and to that end it's clear only centralised governmental control has the ability to level the playing field (so to speak).
How do you level the 'good' school in a middle class commuter belt with a 'bad' school next to an inner city estate?
Well you could just give up....or you could try and apply the lessons from the London Challenge..

https://www.cfbt.com/en-GB/Research/Research-libra...

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/london-challeng...

I'd like to see a school system that was so good that parents thought it was ridiculous to spend extra money on private education.
If the state sector was moving forward as fast as you and I would wish in all locations, what makes you think the independent sector would stand still?

edh

3,498 posts

269 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
If the state sector was moving forward as fast as you and I would wish in all locations, what makes you think the independent sector would stand still?
good point - but it might find itself out competed for staff for instance, and end up in a damaging costs spiral. AFAIK there was lots of money pumped into London Challenge as good teachers, lots of them, make the difference.

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
edh said:
turbobloke said:
If the state sector was moving forward as fast as you and I would wish in all locations, what makes you think the independent sector would stand still?
good point - but it might find itself out competed for staff for instance, and end up in a damaging costs spiral. AFAIK there was lots of money pumped into London Challenge as good teachers, lots of them, make the difference.
It would be great to see a much higher-performing state sector. Why it's slow to appear is as much in the hands of schools as it is central government as some institutions do well in spite of rather than because of being state-funded (at any level) and many don't. Knocking public schools won't fix anything, that's for sure!

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
edh said:
turbobloke said:
If the state sector was moving forward as fast as you and I would wish in all locations, what makes you think the independent sector would stand still?
good point - but it might find itself out competed for staff for instance, and end up in a damaging costs spiral. AFAIK there was lots of money pumped into London Challenge as good teachers, lots of them, make the difference.
Honestly if it really became a price war then I think the private sector would probably win out - there are plenty of "vocational" teachers out there but human nature would win out. As distasteful as it sounds it would. But I would like nothing more than our teachers to be intellectual titans on £150k a year and our schools to be institutions of pure learning.

It cannot and will not happen - there is just too much idiocracy required to support the current status quo for that ever to happen.

RYH64E

7,960 posts

244 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
edh said:
good point - but it might find itself out competed for staff for instance, and end up in a damaging costs spiral. AFAIK there was lots of money pumped into London Challenge as good teachers, lots of them, make the difference.
Unfortunately good teachers won't make up for poor parents, you can throw as much money as you like at problem schools but but they'll never match the standards of even poorly funded schools where parents value education and take an active part in educating their children.

An inner London school that I have some contact with attributes it's recent academic improvement to an influx of East European immigrants displacing the indigineous white working class pupils, the immigrant pupils want an education, the local hillbillys couldn't care less, funding isn't a factor and the staff haven't changed.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
edh said:
I'd like to see a school system that was so good that parents thought it was ridiculous to spend extra money on private education.
Couldn't agree more! I don't see how placing additional costs on private schools which would inevitably lead to additional costs on the state system acheives this though.

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
edh said:
I'd like to see a school system that was so good that parents thought it was ridiculous to spend extra money on private education.
Couldn't agree more! I don't see how placing additional costs on private schools which would inevitably lead to additional costs on the state system acheives this though.
Missing the point fblm... How you make things better for the have nots is you tax tax tax, take take take and hammer into socialist submission the haves. Come on Comrade... keep up it is so obvious, you just need to 'believe'!

jogon

2,971 posts

158 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
edh said:
I'd like to see a school system that was so good that parents thought it was ridiculous to spend extra money on private education.
Couldn't agree more! I don't see how placing additional costs on private schools which would inevitably lead to additional costs on the state system acheives this though.
We already have elitist state schools though where folks who can afford pay a premium for house prices to be in the catchment area but the stand out example has to be London Oratory where Blair and Clegg sent/send their kids. Sort the inequality out in your own yard before picking on folk who pay a premium and take a huge strain off the current education system.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/educat...

http://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/979/0/london-orato...