BTL as a pension fund - why not?

BTL as a pension fund - why not?

Author
Discussion

tannhauser

1,773 posts

215 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
fblm said:
tannhauser said:
I concur. What a complete ahole.
You accidentally completely disagreed with the last person you concured with hehe
Come again?!

98elise

26,601 posts

161 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
To be fair reading it back it isn't entirely clear.

I don't personally think BTL is especially helpful to first time buyers and I think there are too many amateur landlords who don't have a clue what they're doing, but it is only one factor and pales into insignificance compared to the limited housing supply. There are certainly plenty of places round here and in Leeds where I used to live that are still perfectly within reach of FTB regardless of the best efforts of evil landlords wink
Is there really any substance to this housing shortage though?

I only ask because in practical terms if I go onto Rightmove and put in Northampton, Bedford, Cambridge or Birmingham and a max price of £150k and then do a search within a 40 mile radius it tops out on every single one and just says more than 1000 results.

I may be being rather simplistic here but if there genuinely was limited supply should we not expect that number to be far smaller? Now I am sure there are all manner of papers, studies and published works on why there is this etherial shortage but there has to come a point where you look at the practical data sat in front of you surely?

It seems to me that there are a whole bunch of people running around giving it the "we're all doomed" attitude and suggesting that there are queues of people waiting to buy FTB type value property and there is none to be had. Yet when you employ some simple ascertation of the facts as they stand in the real world then guess what... houses galore!

If I am missing something then by all means tell me what it is, I am all ears!
If there are 1001 people wanting a property and 1000 properties available, then people start offering full price to secure a property (may even be over). Agents then know they can put asking prices up.

If you have 999 people wanting a property, and 1000 are for sale, then sellers will accept lower offers to make sure they get a sale. Then asking prices start to drop.

The volume for sale is only half of the story.




Edited by 98elise on Friday 28th November 17:47

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
Sonic said:
Justayellowbadge said:
Small bit of damage to a shower door, for instance. Easy fix, the sort of thing a landlord or decent agent would pick up on and sort in a morning.

Or don't, and wonder why, a year later, there's a 3 grand bill for the ceiling that's come down.
And here i am jamming towels into the leaky shower door and using a hairdryer on the wall and door downstairs to try and dry out the water and stop my LL's ceiling from coming through hehe

6 months on and they still haven't replaced it despite having had the agent out 4 times and a plumber out twice, because they wont spend a few hundred quid on a new shower door.

If they'd allow me to take on a secure tenancy, say a year or longer, than i'd bloody well fix it myself. But when they insist on 6-months rent upfront every 6 months for a fixed-term then there's not a chance in hell.

Edited by Sonic on Friday 28th November 16:29
That's a little different from the situation I outlined, as a) you seem to care and b) 4 agent visits and 2 plumbers.

Sounds like a cock up, as it would already have cost the landlord a couple of hundred in fees.

Thing is, there is a middle ground between 'My rights, my rights, quiet enjoyment, I know my rights' and 'My landlord never bothers doing anything.'

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
98elise said:
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
To be fair reading it back it isn't entirely clear.

I don't personally think BTL is especially helpful to first time buyers and I think there are too many amateur landlords who don't have a clue what they're doing, but it is only one factor and pales into insignificance compared to the limited housing supply. There are certainly plenty of places round here and in Leeds where I used to live that are still perfectly within reach of FTB regardless of the best efforts of evil landlords wink
Is there really any substance to this housing shortage though?

I only ask because in practical terms if I go onto Rightmove and put in Northampton, Bedford, Cambridge or Birmingham and a max price of £150k and then do a search within a 40 mile radius it tops out on every single one and just says more than 1000 results.

I may be being rather simplistic here but if there genuinely was limited supply should we not expect that number to be far smaller? Now I am sure there are all manner of papers, studies and published works on why there is this etherial shortage but there has to come a point where you look at the practical data sat in front of you surely?

It seems to me that there are a whole bunch of people running around giving it the "we're all doomed" attitude and suggesting that there are queues of people waiting to buy FTB type value property and there is none to be had. Yet when you employ some simple ascertation of the facts as they stand in the real world then guess what... houses galore!

If I am missing something then by all means tell me what it is, I am all ears!
If there are 1001 people wanting a property and 1000 properties available, then people start offering full price to secure a property (may even be over). Agents then know they can put asking prices up.

If you have 999 people wanting a property, and 1000 are for sale, then sellers will accept lower offers to make sure they get a sale. Then asking prices start to drop.

The volume for sale is only half of the story.

Edited by 98elise on Friday 28th November 17:47
Accepted, however if that kind of demand based inflation was really having a net effect then surely we would be seeing houses with far higher asking prices no? I only say that as I am currently looking at another BTL (yes I am one of the devils!) which is down the road from one I bought 4 years ago and is an identical property, it is about 3% more expensive than the one I bought previously, it is however in slightly better condition and doesn't need a new boiler and radiators for a start!

It is in a developing and reasonably affluent midlands university town and not a student property either.

I can't speak for the rest of the country of course but there are seemingly thousands of properties available at very affordable prices, so at a macro level if that kind of inflation was a real thing then those properties at that price would not be there no?


Edited by heppers75 on Friday 28th November 18:28

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
fblm said:
tannhauser said:
I concur. What a complete ahole.
You accidentally completely disagreed with the last person you concured with hehe
Come again?!
Derek said house prices had nothing to do with population and house building and everything to do with credit, interest rates and greed. You "agreed 100%" and added that it was also to do with immigration, completely contradicting what you just agreed with "100%". Try and keep up at the back. Perhaps if you'd spent a little less time fixated on people being assholes and sticking things in other peoples assholes you'd have something worthwhile to add.

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
Is there really any substance to this housing shortage though?
No, otherwise rents would've rocketed

heppers75

3,135 posts

217 months

Friday 28th November 2014
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
heppers75 said:
Is there really any substance to this housing shortage though?
No, otherwise rents would've rocketed
Very true, in fact the more you consider all of the facts the ones in the real world which would support the premise actually don't!

Which leads me to the conclusion that it is not at all that there are no properties available, however perhaps it is far more likely that there are not the properties that those looking want - which is a very different thing!

BoRED S2upid

19,701 posts

240 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
Very true, in fact the more you consider all of the facts the ones in the real world which would support the premise actually don't!

Which leads me to the conclusion that it is not at all that there are no properties available, however perhaps it is far more likely that there are not the properties that those looking want - which is a very different thing!
Or ... And I'm just throwing this out there as I know it's not very British. Lots of people don't actually want to buy a house! They actually want to rent from a mean old landlord.

economicpygmy

387 posts

123 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Or ... And I'm just throwing this out there as I know it's not very British. Lots of people don't actually want to buy a house! They actually want to rent from a mean old landlord.
I agree its not British. Ive met a few people who rent out their home and rent for a few years near a work place but IME I dont know of a single person that wants to rent long term. I cant believe how desperate people get to own. From what Ive seen plenty of aspiring home owners go without and/or sign up for shared ownership on tiny anti-social noise ridden shoe-boxes just so they can call a place their own (which is normally the kind of place I target when staying away on a contract as Im tight wink ). I even met a girl who lived in a shed just so she could save up a deposit.

98elise

26,601 posts

161 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
98elise said:
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
To be fair reading it back it isn't entirely clear.

I don't personally think BTL is especially helpful to first time buyers and I think there are too many amateur landlords who don't have a clue what they're doing, but it is only one factor and pales into insignificance compared to the limited housing supply. There are certainly plenty of places round here and in Leeds where I used to live that are still perfectly within reach of FTB regardless of the best efforts of evil landlords wink
Is there really any substance to this housing shortage though?

I only ask because in practical terms if I go onto Rightmove and put in Northampton, Bedford, Cambridge or Birmingham and a max price of £150k and then do a search within a 40 mile radius it tops out on every single one and just says more than 1000 results.

I may be being rather simplistic here but if there genuinely was limited supply should we not expect that number to be far smaller? Now I am sure there are all manner of papers, studies and published works on why there is this etherial shortage but there has to come a point where you look at the practical data sat in front of you surely?

It seems to me that there are a whole bunch of people running around giving it the "we're all doomed" attitude and suggesting that there are queues of people waiting to buy FTB type value property and there is none to be had. Yet when you employ some simple ascertation of the facts as they stand in the real world then guess what... houses galore!

If I am missing something then by all means tell me what it is, I am all ears!
If there are 1001 people wanting a property and 1000 properties available, then people start offering full price to secure a property (may even be over). Agents then know they can put asking prices up.

If you have 999 people wanting a property, and 1000 are for sale, then sellers will accept lower offers to make sure they get a sale. Then asking prices start to drop.

The volume for sale is only half of the story.

Edited by 98elise on Friday 28th November 17:47
Accepted, however if that kind of demand based inflation was really having a net effect then surely we would be seeing houses with far higher asking prices no? I only say that as I am currently looking at another BTL (yes I am one of the devils!) which is down the road from one I bought 4 years ago and is an identical property, it is about 3% more expensive than the one I bought previously, it is however in slightly better condition and doesn't need a new boiler and radiators for a start!

It is in a developing and reasonably affluent midlands university town and not a student property either.

I can't speak for the rest of the country of course but there are seemingly thousands of properties available at very affordable prices, so at a macro level if that kind of inflation was a real thing then those properties at that price would not be there no?


Edited by heppers75 on Friday 28th November 18:28
That just means that in your area buyers and sellers are evenly matched.

In the past 4 years I've bought 4 properties for around the same price, but in the last year prices have jumped by 30%. The trigger was help to buy. I now can't find anything suitable that makes financial sense as rents are lagging. That said they are also on the way so its only a matter of time.

RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
crankedup said:
I almost hardly dare suggest this! but wasn't it a certain P.M. named Thatcher that was such a strong advocate of buy your own home and sold Council housing stock...
This subject always raises a wry smile in me. My Father-in-Law is staunch socialist, Labour voter, reads The Mirror, hates Thatcher with a vengeance, thinks Tories re the scourge of the Earth...

Retired to Somerset when he was 60'ish buying a bungalow on a new estate, he's 95 now, been there 35 years. He openly admits he'd never have been able to do any of this if he'd not bought his council house in Slough at a knock down price, doubling his money and thus providing the capital with which to buy his new bungalow.

Funny old world isn't it biggrinbiglaughbiggrin



RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
Sharted said:
...You would need a repayment mortgage to ensure that it is paid off within your timescale...
Just working my way through the thread but why is this? If I buy a property age 60 with, say a 50/50 mortgage, why should I not use an interest only mortgage? I intend to use the rental income as part of my pension so I will never sell the property. When my sons inherit it they can either sell and pay of the mortgage or keep it. Why do I need a repayment mortgage? confused

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
RichB said:
ust working my way through the thread but why is this? If I buy a property age 60 with, say a 50/50 mortgage, why should I not use an interest only mortgage? I intend to use the rental income as part of my pension so I will never sell the property. When my sons inherit it they can either sell and pay of the mortgage or keep it. Why do I need a repayment mortgage? confused
Would that make sense though, as a pension?

Your rent would not be much greater than the mortgage payments even on IO, and you'll have costs on top.

If your are discounting capital appreciation you culd well get a better return from your 50% stake elsewhere.

RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Saturday 29th November 2014
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
RichB said:
ust working my way through the thread but why is this? If I buy a property age 60 with, say a 50/50 mortgage, why should I not use an interest only mortgage? I intend to use the rental income as part of my pension so I will never sell the property. When my sons inherit it they can either sell and pay of the mortgage or keep it. Why do I need a repayment mortgage? confused
Would that make sense though, as a pension? Your rent would not be much greater than the mortgage payments even on IO, and you'll have costs on top. If your are discounting capital appreciation you culd well get a better return from your 50% stake elsewhere.
I understand that point but referring to the quote below, if I did decide to buy a property I don't see why I'd need a repayment mortgage.

Sharted said:
...You would need a repayment mortgage to ensure that it is paid off within your timescale which makes the rental income very important...



Edited by RichB on Saturday 29th November 16:55


Edited by RichB on Saturday 29th November 16:55

Guybrush

4,350 posts

206 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
RichB said:
crankedup said:
I almost hardly dare suggest this! but wasn't it a certain P.M. named Thatcher that was such a strong advocate of buy your own home and sold Council housing stock...
This subject always raises a wry smile in me. My Father-in-Law is staunch socialist, Labour voter, reads The Mirror, hates Thatcher with a vengeance, thinks Tories re the scourge of the Earth...

Retired to Somerset when he was 60'ish buying a bungalow on a new estate, he's 95 now, been there 35 years. He openly admits he'd never have been able to do any of this if he'd not bought his council house in Slough at a knock down price, doubling his money and thus providing the capital with which to buy his new bungalow.

Funny old world isn't it biggrinbiglaughbiggrin

Funny old world maybe; I'd say it's a predictable old world and one of the most predictable things is that a socialist is really an envious and resentful hypocrite.

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
Oddly I wanted to own a house so that I would have somewhere to live that I knew I couldn't be kicked out of with 2 months notice, was allowed to decorate and didn't have to have people coming in inspecting it every few months. Not to mention paying my own mortgage instead of someone else's. House price inflation doesn't help me if the next house up is more expensive as well.

Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains wink
And you can, there are literally thousands of houses up and down the UK for sale right now for between £100k-£150k that a FTB could purchase, some within commuting distance of the capital and if you choose not to have a South East centric view of the country then plenty within large towns, cities, villages etc right up through the midlands and beyond.

I really do fail to see the logic in anyone arguing what you are, it is almost like you are saying there simply are not any properties out there for anyone to buy, which is just utter crap!
The average wage in the UK is 26.5K which gives a mortgage of about 80K and remember 50% of the population will be on less than that.

RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
Guybrush said:
Funny old world maybe; I'd say it's a predictable old world and one of the most predictable things is that a socialist is really an envious and resentful hypocrite.
We did used to have that discussion after a glass of red but over the last few years I don't rise to his bait wink

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
Guybrush said:
RichB said:
crankedup said:
I almost hardly dare suggest this! but wasn't it a certain P.M. named Thatcher that was such a strong advocate of buy your own home and sold Council housing stock...
This subject always raises a wry smile in me. My Father-in-Law is staunch socialist, Labour voter, reads The Mirror, hates Thatcher with a vengeance, thinks Tories re the scourge of the Earth...

Retired to Somerset when he was 60'ish buying a bungalow on a new estate, he's 95 now, been there 35 years. He openly admits he'd never have been able to do any of this if he'd not bought his council house in Slough at a knock down price, doubling his money and thus providing the capital with which to buy his new bungalow.

Funny old world isn't it biggrinbiglaughbiggrin

Funny old world maybe; I'd say it's a predictable old world and one of the most predictable things is that a socialist is really an envious and resentful hypocrite.
Are greedy, selfish capitalist hypocrital when they use state services?

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
The distinction between socialists and capitalists -

Capitalism is defined as the exploitation of man by man.

Socialism is the exact opposite.

RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Sunday 30th November 2014
quotequote all
This is not the place for it, it's a thread about pensions. I simply recounted my anecdote because Crampedup couldn't resist a chip at Maggie Thatcher. biggrin