BTL as a pension fund - why not?
Discussion
RichB said:
This is not the place for it, it's a thread about pensions. I simply recounted my anecdote because Crampedup couldn't resist a chip at Maggie Thatcher.
I do my best.Your anecdote is identical to our situation, my inlaws lived in a Council flat in Barking and had been Council tenants all their married lives. The chance to purchase their flat brought with it much angst, my late Father-in-law was constantly asking 'what should I do' about buying the flat and pondering why he should or should not buy the flat. My Brother-in-law also was on the listening and guidance end of the same questions. Fortunately both of us advised exactly the same, you should purchase and this is why. They took the advise and never for one moment regretted their actions.
And yet I am now able to recognise that the actual sale of social housing was nothing more than political engineering. Or maybe a chance to off load local government problems, perhaps a practical solution to the improvement of some run down housing areas into smarter well kept homes by proud owners. Nothing is ever as cut and dried as may appear I suppose.
Edited by crankedup on Sunday 30th November 12:12
Fittster said:
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
Oddly I wanted to own a house so that I would have somewhere to live that I knew I couldn't be kicked out of with 2 months notice, was allowed to decorate and didn't have to have people coming in inspecting it every few months. Not to mention paying my own mortgage instead of someone else's. House price inflation doesn't help me if the next house up is more expensive as well.
Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
And you can, there are literally thousands of houses up and down the UK for sale right now for between £100k-£150k that a FTB could purchase, some within commuting distance of the capital and if you choose not to have a South East centric view of the country then plenty within large towns, cities, villages etc right up through the midlands and beyond. Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
I really do fail to see the logic in anyone arguing what you are, it is almost like you are saying there simply are not any properties out there for anyone to buy, which is just utter crap!
http://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/mansfield/gol...
I am sure however all those folks on £26k a year don't want to live "somewhere like that" as it will be beneath their station!!!
Edited by heppers75 on Sunday 30th November 14:27
heppers75 said:
Fittster said:
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
Oddly I wanted to own a house so that I would have somewhere to live that I knew I couldn't be kicked out of with 2 months notice, was allowed to decorate and didn't have to have people coming in inspecting it every few months. Not to mention paying my own mortgage instead of someone else's. House price inflation doesn't help me if the next house up is more expensive as well.
Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
And you can, there are literally thousands of houses up and down the UK for sale right now for between £100k-£150k that a FTB could purchase, some within commuting distance of the capital and if you choose not to have a South East centric view of the country then plenty within large towns, cities, villages etc right up through the midlands and beyond. Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
I really do fail to see the logic in anyone arguing what you are, it is almost like you are saying there simply are not any properties out there for anyone to buy, which is just utter crap!
http://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/mansfield/gol...
I am sure however all those folks on £26k a year don't want to live "somewhere like that" as it will be beneath their station!!!
Edited by heppers75 on Sunday 30th November 14:27
As you like zoopla so much: http://www.zoopla.co.uk/heatmaps/
RichB said:
crankedup said:
I do my best.
I appreciate that And... you drove a Griff so you can't be all bad Sorry folks it just had to be said, now back on topic :
Our son is already bundling pension packages, three at the moment from different employers + he has got his BTL investments. Expect he will shortly have another pension from the next employer as soon as he is tuped across.
economicpygmy said:
heppers75 said:
Fittster said:
heppers75 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
Oddly I wanted to own a house so that I would have somewhere to live that I knew I couldn't be kicked out of with 2 months notice, was allowed to decorate and didn't have to have people coming in inspecting it every few months. Not to mention paying my own mortgage instead of someone else's. House price inflation doesn't help me if the next house up is more expensive as well.
Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
And you can, there are literally thousands of houses up and down the UK for sale right now for between £100k-£150k that a FTB could purchase, some within commuting distance of the capital and if you choose not to have a South East centric view of the country then plenty within large towns, cities, villages etc right up through the midlands and beyond. Don't worry though , we aren't trying to steal your capital gains
I really do fail to see the logic in anyone arguing what you are, it is almost like you are saying there simply are not any properties out there for anyone to buy, which is just utter crap!
http://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/mansfield/gol...
I am sure however all those folks on £26k a year don't want to live "somewhere like that" as it will be beneath their station!!!
Edited by heppers75 on Sunday 30th November 14:27
As you like zoopla so much: http://www.zoopla.co.uk/
rovermorris999 said:
heppers75 said:
Showing "averages" is surely skewed though no? I mean if there are greater numbers of expensive properties then the average increases. That does not mean there are fewer cheaper ones.
It depends whether we're talking mean or median. 'Average' can be a moveable feast.So go on, give me the facts.... I swear to all that is Holy the second someone does I will say sorry and f**k me you were right and I was wrong...
Right now... It seems to me it is a piss poor house of cards created for reasons passing understanding!
You cannot deviate from the fact no matter what argument you wish to present that there are thousands of sub £150k properties available in the UK.. These are properties that are more than purchasable by the £25k a year folks... They might be where they WANT to live or what they THINK they are entitled to.. But they are homes they can own... Then they get to do what we all did, work their way up if they are good enough!
Edited by heppers75 on Sunday 30th November 20:13
heppers75 said:
Agreed..
So go on, give me the facts.... I swear to all that is Holy the second someone does I will say sorry and f**k me you were right and I was wrong...
Right now... It seems to me it is a piss poor house of cards created for reasons passing understanding!
I have no opinion on the matter. Merely pointing out there are statistics and statistics.So go on, give me the facts.... I swear to all that is Holy the second someone does I will say sorry and f**k me you were right and I was wrong...
Right now... It seems to me it is a piss poor house of cards created for reasons passing understanding!
economicpygmy said:
heppers75 said:
Then they get to do what we all did, work their way up if they are good enough! 20:13[/footnote]
That is increasingly unlikely as inflation trends upwards, credit avaliability and wages remain static. Sustainable growth is an interesting phrase...
Average wage = £26k a year, seemingly lots of housing stock available well within the multiples of that income for mortgage purposes.
The one thing that has always bothered me about the ever increasing bleating on about the increase in the "average" house price is the fact that is the real reason the average is going up because there are a greater number of expensive houses, or that housers in the middle and upper tiers have disproportionately increased in value, which does not mean there are fewer affordable ones?
I don't know if that is true, however when you actually bother to look at the houses that are out there for sale there does seem to be many thousands of them all over the country which are more than affordable on average wages.
Is it that there is an expectation that the average wage should be able to afford the average house?
heppers75 said:
economicpygmy said:
heppers75 said:
Then they get to do what we all did, work their way up if they are good enough! 20:13[/footnote]
That is increasingly unlikely as inflation trends upwards, credit avaliability and wages remain static. Sustainable growth is an interesting phrase...
Average wage = £26k a year, seemingly lots of housing stock available well within the multiples of that income for mortgage purposes.
The one thing that has always bothered me about the ever increasing bleating on about the increase in the "average" house price is the fact that is the real reason the average is going up because there are a greater number of expensive houses, or that housers in the middle and upper tiers have disproportionately increased in value, which does not mean there are fewer affordable ones?
I don't know if that is true, however when you actually bother to look at the houses that are out there for sale there does seem to be many thousands of them all over the country which are more than affordable on average wages.
Is it that there is an expectation that the average wage should be able to afford the average house?
markcoznottz said:
heppers75 said:
economicpygmy said:
heppers75 said:
Then they get to do what we all did, work their way up if they are good enough! 20:13[/footnote]
That is increasingly unlikely as inflation trends upwards, credit avaliability and wages remain static. Sustainable growth is an interesting phrase...
Average wage = £26k a year, seemingly lots of housing stock available well within the multiples of that income for mortgage purposes.
The one thing that has always bothered me about the ever increasing bleating on about the increase in the "average" house price is the fact that is the real reason the average is going up because there are a greater number of expensive houses, or that housers in the middle and upper tiers have disproportionately increased in value, which does not mean there are fewer affordable ones?
I don't know if that is true, however when you actually bother to look at the houses that are out there for sale there does seem to be many thousands of them all over the country which are more than affordable on average wages.
Is it that there is an expectation that the average wage should be able to afford the average house?
The issue is I would contend that the average house in price terms is not actually indicative of the actual average house. Then you have certain people assuming that they are 'entitled' to their view of an average house based on a combination of price and what they perceive based on what is portrayed to them and not at all based on what really is an average house.
It would be useful to look at the mode when considering house prices and incomes, that is the most common value, which would give a better idea of what Mr & Mrs Average can afford. Averages are too easily skewed by a few very high (or very low) numbers. Does anyone know where that information can be found?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff