CIA lied over brutal interrogations
Discussion
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
irocfan said:
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
It's exactly an either /or situation.
Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
What a load of tosh.Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
Jimbeaux said:
heppers75 said:
jshell said:
irocfan said:
9/11 was the result of a bunch of psychos gaining control of some aircraft and then murdering thousands - US foreign policy was just a convenient excuse
Do you really believe that they just acted without some 'in their own heads' justification? The West has been poking fingers into the middle East for many years and as a consequence they absolutely hate us. It's not so long ago that the US and UK were considering arming ISIS, FFS!9/11 was an obvious, and stated revenge attack for some of the stuff Western nations have been doing.
US foreign policy, together with other Western nations' foreign policy was exactly the cause and motivation for 9/11.
For the hard of thinking, that doesn't mean it was justified, but a bit of historical accuracy is important when discussing the subject!
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
KareemK said:
irocfan said:
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
It's exactly an either /or situation.
Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
What a load of tosh.Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
A better UK.
There are no circumstances where the only option is keeping the poor status quo or opting for worse. Your question was ridiculous.
KareemK said:
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
irocfan said:
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
It's exactly an either /or situation.
Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
What a load of tosh.Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
heppers75 said:
jshell said:
irocfan said:
9/11 was the result of a bunch of psychos gaining control of some aircraft and then murdering thousands - US foreign policy was just a convenient excuse
Do you really believe that they just acted without some 'in their own heads' justification? The West has been poking fingers into the middle East for many years and as a consequence they absolutely hate us. It's not so long ago that the US and UK were considering arming ISIS, FFS!9/11 was an obvious, and stated revenge attack for some of the stuff Western nations have been doing.
US foreign policy, together with other Western nations' foreign policy was exactly the cause and motivation for 9/11.
For the hard of thinking, that doesn't mean it was justified, but a bit of historical accuracy is important when discussing the subject!
Just another example of our (well, US) meddling in the middle East: The Iran Contra affair which in effect turned Saddam Hussain against the West, to which he'd previously been a 'friend'. He finds out that during the Iran/Iraq war that the US was supplying him with arms and also that the US was funding arms for his enemy, Iran. So, we have the US funding both sides of the same war! No wonder they hate us. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/spec...
Again, I present the above not as justification for the atrocities, but as an attempt to understand them outside of the simplistic garbage spouted here in this thread.
Jimbeaux said:
The Dems should have displayed the same "moral highground" regarding Benghazi; the IRS scandal; AP reporters being spied on by the White House; the Fast & Furious scandal; the V.A. scandal; the Obamacare mistruths. Those were all very big news items here (maybe not there). These issues effected all Americans. The Dems only worked to cover them up to protect the administration, especially as elections were coming up. If they had not gotten swept in the elections, you would not have heard of this.
Interesting. I hadn't heard of a few of those but a quick read around doesn't suggest much in the way of a cover up. I will admit that this might well not have seen the light of day had it not started on the Dems watch.So, politics aside, do you think the report is wrong and that the torture was useful? The report suggests otherwise and they have all the information to hand. They say the CIA lied to Congress, pulling the wool over the eyes of Dems as well as Republicans so while the situation was put in place by Bush the Republicans aren't responsible for the excesses.
HoHoHo said:
Wow, we waterboarded and humiliated them......
How awful for them
Perhaps we should have stuck electric probes to their testicles and once they gave information we needed turned the power up and offered them to IMCGMOOH contestants.
They are animals and they deserve no respect whatsoever.
How awful for them
Perhaps we should have stuck electric probes to their testicles and once they gave information we needed turned the power up and offered them to IMCGMOOH contestants.
They are animals and they deserve no respect whatsoever.
HoHoHo said:
pork911 said:
HoHoHo said:
They are animals and they deserve no respect whatsoever.
let's hope you are never the subject of rendition
I hope so too because they are utter, utter animals and don't play by normal rules.
HoHoHo said:
I've asked a question, are you capable of answering it?
In law, rendition is a "surrender" or "handing over" of persons or property, particularly from one jurisdiction to another.
I'm hoping I'm not handed over to ICIS
And you?
In law, rendition is a "surrender" or "handing over" of persons or property, particularly from one jurisdiction to another.
I'm hoping I'm not handed over to ICIS
And you?
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
KareemK said:
irocfan said:
Jimbeaux said:
KareemK said:
HD Adam said:
It's exactly an either /or situation.
Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
What a load of tosh.Sure, we'd all like to sit around in fluffy kitten land singing "Kumbaya" and holding hands but that's not very realistic.
Go on, make a choice. UK or Tribal Hills of Afghanistan/Pakistan right this second.
A better UK.
There are no circumstances where the only option is keeping the poor status quo or opting for worse. Your question was ridiculous.
I've deliberately asked him a fixed question like "So, when did you stop beating your wife?" which is unfair in this context.
Of course, we'd all like to live in a better UK or USA but the realists on here know the answer to that.
If you really feel strongly about this Kareem, join Amnesty International or even become a politician and change it from the inside.
If you don't want to do this, STFU and keep letting other people take the decisions you can't stomach. Or show your disgust by leaving for somewhere better.
Jimbeaux said:
There you have it. This is the part that many simply cannot seem to grasp.
Seriously? They just woke up one day, chanted 'death to America' and hijacked some planes? Don't be stupid, it does you a disservice. Even Clooney's film Syriana mapped out the reasons and motivations for disenfrachised people becoming radicalised.jshell said:
heppers75 said:
jshell said:
irocfan said:
9/11 was the result of a bunch of psychos gaining control of some aircraft and then murdering thousands - US foreign policy was just a convenient excuse
Do you really believe that they just acted without some 'in their own heads' justification? The West has been poking fingers into the middle East for many years and as a consequence they absolutely hate us. It's not so long ago that the US and UK were considering arming ISIS, FFS!9/11 was an obvious, and stated revenge attack for some of the stuff Western nations have been doing.
US foreign policy, together with other Western nations' foreign policy was exactly the cause and motivation for 9/11.
For the hard of thinking, that doesn't mean it was justified, but a bit of historical accuracy is important when discussing the subject!
Just another example of our (well, US) meddling in the middle East: The Iran Contra affair which in effect turned Saddam Hussain against the West, to which he'd previously been a 'friend'. He finds out that during the Iran/Iraq war that the US was supplying him with arms and also that the US was funding arms for his enemy, Iran. So, we have the US funding both sides of the same war! No wonder they hate us. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/spec...
Again, I present the above not as justification for the atrocities, but as an attempt to understand them outside of the simplistic garbage spouted here in this thread.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff