Life found on Mars?!

Author
Discussion

onyx39

11,120 posts

150 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Morningside said:
greygoose said:
I hope we have a plan to kill them before they invade......
Nah, sounds like a million to one.
But still they'(ll) come!

smile

HD Adam

5,147 posts

184 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
I welcome our new Overlords


Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
Morningside said:
greygoose said:
I hope we have a plan to kill them before they invade......
Nah, sounds like a million to one.
But still they'(ll) come!

smile
Honestly - some PHers are like a bunch of Pavlovian dogs.

Talk about conditioned responses.

(Love the album though smile)

hollydog

1,108 posts

192 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Wow. Good job our governments getting immigration under control.laugh

MrBrightSi

2,912 posts

170 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
Morningside said:
greygoose said:
I hope we have a plan to kill them before they invade......
Nah, sounds like a million to one.
But still they'(ll) come!

smile
Great, guitar rifts and synthesizer warbling.

Thanks guys.

wolfracesonic

6,977 posts

127 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
'In the hundred years since the Victoria Cross was created for valour and extreme courage beyond that normally expected of the British soldier in face of the enemy only 1344 have been awarded. Eleven of these were won by the defenders of the mission station at Rorke's Drift............' err, wait a minute, sorry, wrong Richard Burton voiceover..........

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
The headline includes 'might' and 'possibly' so life hasn't been found at all. Nonsense yet again..

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
To my mind it translates as "NASA says 'please can we have some more money'"

Sheets Tabuer

18,950 posts

215 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
To my mind it translates as "NASA says 'please can we have some more money'"
They got more than they asked for this year.

Spikes in methane mean it's either being released by tectonic activity, generated by life or by ultra violet light on organic compounds.

We know there isn't any tectonic activity and the way methane is broken down by UV light we know this is a very local event, I.E something close to the rover is producing methane.

KareemK

1,110 posts

119 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
It's certainly intriguing.

Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
They got more than they asked for this year.

Spikes in methane mean it's either being released by tectonic activity, generated by life or by ultra violet light on organic compounds.

We know there isn't any tectonic activity and the way methane is broken down by UV light we know this is a very local event, I.E something close to the rover is producing methane.
I bet earlier Earth probes have contaminated Mars by now.

Vipers

32,869 posts

228 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
greygoose said:
I hope we have a plan to kill them before they invade......
And before they come here and claim benifits biggrin




smile

Sheets Tabuer

18,950 posts

215 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I bet earlier Earth probes have contaminated Mars by now.
Wouldn't be surprised, they failed to clean this rover properly, the threshold for microbes is 300,000 per surface..

So loads then.

KareemK

1,110 posts

119 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
Eric Mc said:
I bet earlier Earth probes have contaminated Mars by now.
Wouldn't be surprised, they failed to clean this rover properly, the threshold for microbes is 300,000 per surface..

So loads then.
They'll have been killed off on entry and if not then the extreme habitat and exposure to radiation will certainly do for those earth based critters.

Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
We just don't know. Some earth microbes have survived in very inhospitable locations. Some of the earliest probes were not that well sterilised. I'm thinking of the Mars 3 lander that soft landed on Mars back in 1973. Although it landed safely, it failed to return any meaningful data.

Sheets Tabuer

18,950 posts

215 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Bacteria and DNA has survived re-entry to Earth, every extreme place they have looked for life on earth (volcanoes, undersea vents, miles under ground and salt lakes) have yielded life, if it can live there it can live on mars.

Vipers

32,869 posts

228 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
We just don't know. Some earth microbes have survived in very inhospitable locations. Some of the earliest probes were not that well sterilised. I'm thinking of the Mars 3 lander that soft landed on Mars back in 1973. Although it landed safely, it failed to return any meaningful data.
I am sure it's worth the zillion $$$$$$$$$$$$ to find out there is bugger all up there.




smile

Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Exploring other worlds is not just about looking for life - although that is what the media always emphasise.

It's about "finding things out" - as Carl Sagan would say.

LordGrover

33,538 posts

212 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
... which leads to yet more questions. hehe

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

186 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
It's a god-awful small affair...