Paedophile ring - military, law enforcement, political fig

[carinaman]

Guardian article about Northumbria police invoicing the Met £1M for their investigation:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/07/sc...

[Bigends]

carinaman said:

I think it was Bigends who queried how they got the search warrants, but I'm happy to be corrected.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7299003/T...

Yep, details of what was on the warrant application was in yesterdays Mail - apparently quite economic with the truth

[carinaman]

Bigends said:

Yep, details of what was on the warrant application was in yesterdays Mail - apparently quite economic with the truth

Thanks for the heads up.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7324317/T...

[Gargamel]

Bigends said:

Yep, details of what was on the warrant application was in yesterdays Mail - apparently quite economic with the truth

I think that the officers said (to the judge) that it had been internally approved at DAC level, when in fact the inquiry never interviewed anyone at DAC level as they had no oversight of what was going on.

Anyways, looks like the MET have finally conceded that they will publish the report (almost) in full. I know there is a version that La Liga posted but that is far from complete.

Essentially the Met have played a blinder here, its a great guide for any Public Sector body

1. Point blank refuse to discuss the operation and answer no questions ‘Because there is already a inquiry (Henriques)

2. When Henriques becomes available (18 months) - refuse to discuss as ‘we have referred it to the IPC’

3. Wait two years without publishing the report, saying nothing because of the IPC

4. When the IPC announce their findings, refuse to publish the full Henriques because “it may compromise future investigations, and anyway we have already incorporated all of the findings into our new investigation practices’

5. Suggest half heartedly that because one disciplinary case might happen at some point, it would be prejudicial to discuss it any further.

6. Gently allow the passage of time to allow some of the accused to die, delay your apologies and make them so mealy mouthed that its embarrasing, and for a couple of culpable senior officers to retire with full pensions and severance.

Well played the Met, definitely an organization meeting its challenges head on !

[bitchstewie]

Harvey Proctor is on LBC now.

I believe the Met Police are suing him

[Gargamel]

bhstewie said:

Harvey Proctor is on LBC now.

I believe the Met Police are suing him

He is suing the Met for 1m in compo, I haven’t seen anything where they are suing him back.

[Gargamel]

Apparently the full report is due in the next two weeks. I am going to take a wild guess it will be on the same day as BJ calls a General Election.

Tom Watson is not going to come of it well, the MET are in for another shoeing.

[Gargamel]

I see the full report is now published

My frantic apologizing, learning lessons and arse covering going on.

But obviously no senior detectives or individual leaders are going to be suffering any meaningful sanction, despite being told by a QC who having interview Beech told officers that they were being deceived.

[Gargamel]

It will be interesting to see what Harvey Proctor does now.

The Met have not settled his claim for damages (despite all the lessons learned and mea culpa, no ACTUAL settlement)

Proctor lost his reputation, home and job as a result of this embarrassing fiasco by the Met.

Excellent news though the DAC Steve Rodhouse who unbelievably ‘led’ this investigation is now the Director General of the National Crima Agency on 240,000 a year !

I imagine he shares a common purpose with quite a few other influential people.

Trebles all round as PI would say

[Jasandjules]

Some pigs are more equal than others.

[Gargamel]

Harvey Proctor has now made a criminal compliant, against five senior officers.

It was obvious he wouldn’t let it lie.