Paedophile ring - military, law enforcement, political fig

Paedophile ring - military, law enforcement, political fig

Author
Discussion

julianm

1,530 posts

200 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
Yes, a way of giving fantasist w@nkers some sense of exclusive superiority..

carinaman

21,211 posts

171 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
Eclassy said:
http://metro.co.uk/2014/12/22/paedophile-sergeant-...

Can anyone honestly expect the police to properly investigate this kind of crime when they allow one of theirs caught taking up-skirt pictures of little girls to keep his job?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-2485119...

anonymous-user

53 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
smegmore said:
I always thought it a mixture of the ridiculous by having grown men, supposedly respectable members of the community (although I take that with a large pinch of salt)standing around dressed in strange garb muttering weird oaths to one another, and also slightly sinister whereby all kinds of dodgy dealing could be carried out under the oath of secrecy.
My dad was asked to join and he couldn't run away fast enough at the though of a bunch of weird old men standing round with one trouser leg rolled up and a noose around their necks or whatever bullst they get up to.

They must pretty much accept anyone these days as well, seen as how a guy I know has joined and his is about as far from respectable as you can get.

He's absolutely loving the whole secrecy claptrap though. It's like it's the first important thing that's happened in his life.

We spent about half an hour taking the piss and grilling him one night:

What do talk about? - can't tell you.
Who attends the meetings? - can't tell you.
What happens in the meetings? - can't tell you.
Do you have to perform those silly ceremonies? - can't tell you.
Do you have to roll one trouser leg up and all that? - can't tell you.
What's in your briefcase? - can't tell you.
Oh fk off, as if people take that seriously these days - I can't discuss it.
You've known us all for 15 years, we have loads of dirt on you and yet you won't tell us what goes on in your weird all-male bondage sessions? - I've told you I can't talk about it.
Is it just a load of old men bumming each other? - no, of course not.
Do you have to be initiated by wearing one of those women's apron things and being bummed by the old men? - stop it.
Do you kill goats on an alter? No, of course not.
Well tell us what goes on - I can't. It's a serious matter.

Etc

Edited by NinjaPower on Monday 22 December 23:38

smegmore

3,091 posts

175 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
My dad was asked to join and he couldn't run away fast enough at the though of a bunch of weird old men standing round with one trouser leg rolled up and a noose around their necks or whatever bullst they get up to.

They must pretty much accept anyone these days as well, seen as how a guy I know has joined and his is about as far from respectable as you can get.

He's absolutely loving the whole secrecy claptrap though. It's like it's the first important thing that's happened in his life.

We spent about half an hour taking the piss and grilling him one night:

What do talk about? - can't tell you.
Who attends the meetings? - can't tell you.
What happens in the meetings? - can't tell you.
Do you have to perform those silly ceremonies? - can't tell you.
Do you have to roll one trouser leg up and all that? - can't tell you.
What's in your briefcase? - can't tell you.
Oh fk off, as if people take that seriously these days - I can't discuss it.
You've known us all for 15 years, we have loads of dirt on you and yet you won't tell us what goes on in your weird all-male bondage sessions? - I've told you I can't talk about it.

Etc
I couldn't possibly comment, I know too much, they'll cut out my tongue and chuck it in the sea at low tide etc etc...

biggrin



MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

136 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
julianm said:
Yes, a way of giving fantasist w@nkers some sense of exclusive superiority..
Strange post.

jdw100

4,067 posts

163 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Strange post.
Is it just me or do some of those KKK (or UKIP?) chaps look quite dark?

Have they become a fully inclusive organisation now?

Hope so; a very positive step forward!

Grumfutock

5,274 posts

164 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
jdw100 said:
MarshPhantom said:
Strange post.
Is it just me or do some of those KKK (or UKIP?) chaps look quite dark?

Have they become a fully inclusive organisation now?

Hope so; a very positive step forward!
I think they have blacked up for panto season.

Esseesse

8,969 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
smegmore said:
Yes indeed.

After the latest news that Theresa May or May Not has decided that there may be a more 'rigorous' investigation into the subject, I wonder if this is just a case of kicking the can down the road until certain parties who are said to be involved have passed into the great blue yonder.

I'm also a little surprised that, in view of my previous comments, the goats head wearers haven't come out and poo-pooed the possible involvement of their secret and far-reaching cult.

smile
I've only just read this thread, and hadn't really realised this investigation is/will be going on (news pre-occupied by a UKIPper using the word 'chinky').

Why is Theresa May deciding there may or may not be a more rigorous investigation? I thought the police were not meant to answer to politicians, they were meant to uphold the law and by design did not take orders from MP's so as to make sure we didn't end up in a situation where parliament is in effect above the law. Police taking orders from MP's tends to a police state IMO.

jdw100

4,067 posts

163 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
Grumfutock said:
I think they have blacked up for panto season.
That would be some sort of weird irony..?

greygoose

8,224 posts

194 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
Esseesse said:
smegmore said:
Yes indeed.

After the latest news that Theresa May or May Not has decided that there may be a more 'rigorous' investigation into the subject, I wonder if this is just a case of kicking the can down the road until certain parties who are said to be involved have passed into the great blue yonder.

I'm also a little surprised that, in view of my previous comments, the goats head wearers haven't come out and poo-pooed the possible involvement of their secret and far-reaching cult.

smile
I've only just read this thread, and hadn't really realised this investigation is/will be going on (news pre-occupied by a UKIPper using the word 'chinky').

Why is Theresa May deciding there may or may not be a more rigorous investigation? I thought the police were not meant to answer to politicians, they were meant to uphold the law and by design did not take orders from MP's so as to make sure we didn't end up in a situation where parliament is in effect above the law. Police taking orders from MP's tends to a police state IMO.
She has decided the Inquiry needs to be more rigorous, it isn't a police inquiry but the investigation into what happened at the time and if things were covered up, though the slow pace of finding a leader for the inquiry may indicate it is being kicked down the road till long after the election.

jogon

2,971 posts

157 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
Seems to have all gone a bit quiet on the LIBLABCON paedo case anyone know when the names will be released? I've looked at the list of MPs who plan to stand down in May and there aren't that many who were around in the 1970s and 80s.

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide/retirements...

ChrisRS6

736 posts

182 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
It's been said before and will come out again....not only are the organisations all ready mentioned on here guilty....but the BBC knew all about what went on for decades.

Jill Dando was about to blow the full story but someone decided to pop her off on her own doorstep....coincidence?....damn right was it.

When this story breaks it will be massive.

jdw100

4,067 posts

163 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
ChrisRS6 said:
It's been said before and will come out again....not only are the organisations all ready mentioned on here guilty....but the BBC knew all about what went on for decades.

Jill Dando was about to blow the full story but someone decided to pop her off on her own doorstep....coincidence?....damn right was it.

When this story breaks it will be massive.
Seriously? Last theory I heard was she was bumped off by Eastern-European gangsters....I may be a bit behind the times there...

jogon

2,971 posts

157 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
jdw100 said:
ChrisRS6 said:
It's been said before and will come out again....not only are the organisations all ready mentioned on here guilty....but the BBC knew all about what went on for decades.

Jill Dando was about to blow the full story but someone decided to pop her off on her own doorstep....coincidence?....damn right was it.

When this story breaks it will be massive.
Seriously? Last theory I heard was she was bumped off by Eastern-European gangsters....I may be a bit behind the times there...
Apologies for Mail link but it seems there could possibly be a connection - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2698820/Mu...

Tip of the iceberg it seems.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

254 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
People keep finding useful information in the Mail, then apologising for finding it in the Mail.

Funny old world...

KareemK

1,110 posts

118 months

Wednesday 24th December 2014
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
People keep finding useful information in the Mail, then apologising for finding it in the Mail.

Funny old world...
Something to do with it being a racist right wing xenophobic rag I suspect.

I could be wrong.

I do remember it happening once before biggrin

Mmmmmm, winter pimms is delicious. yes

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

136 months

Wednesday 31st December 2014
quotequote all
Classic piece of victim blaming by Butler-Sloss today.

Victims fault if the enquiry doesn't happen and enquiry will have no credibility if not chaired by "establishment" figure.

Crazy.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

254 months

Wednesday 31st December 2014
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Classic piece of victim blaming by Butler-Sloss today.

Victims fault if the enquiry doesn't happen and enquiry will have no credibility if not chaired by "establishment" figure.

Crazy.
That's not how it came across to me. She was eminently suitable for the task.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

254 months

Wednesday 31st December 2014
quotequote all
KareemK said:
mybrainhurts said:
People keep finding useful information in the Mail, then apologising for finding it in the Mail.

Funny old world...
Something to do with it being a racist right wing xenophobic rag I suspect.

I could be wrong.

I do remember it happening once before biggrin

Mmmmmm, winter pimms is delicious. yes
I fear you missed the point.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

261 months

Wednesday 31st December 2014
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Classic piece of victim blaming by Butler-Sloss today.

Victims fault if the enquiry doesn't happen and enquiry will have no credibility if not chaired by "establishment" figure.

Crazy.
Not the way I read it.